Jump to content

Arrow768

Head Admins / Devs
  • Posts

    1,664
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

Linked Accounts

  • Byond CKey
    arrow768

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Arrow768's Achievements

Cyborg

Cyborg (35/37)

1

Community Answers

  1. Application accepted. Activity will be re-evauluated in a few months.
  2. This suggestion is being archived as the relevant PR has been closed for the reasons stated in the PR
  3. Has also been added and should be available next round.
  4. As there has been no reply from @restricted this complaint will be closed without further action.
  5. @restricted Unless there is anything else you would like to add I will close the complaint within 24h
  6. Should be available next round in the operations category
  7. I´ll handle this complaint as its a complaint against the CCIA Lead. Let's start out with the initial IR: First of all: I have not checked the logs of the round and I assume that what has been mentioned in the interviews/IR are actually facts. If that is not the case let me know. I believe that a reprimand for giving a PAI a law to "annoy" a single crew member ("Annoy Imogen Janse") is relatively mild punishment and it might have led to a whitelist removal if ahelped. In my opinion it is generally under the XOs purview to decide how to operate the Service department (if there is a fee for all or certain items or if certain items are served or not). However, I do agree with CCIA to curtail that authority if a specific XO shows poor judgement (in that regard). As such I believe the following reprimand to be warranted: Let's continue with the appeal: The first part to look at before posting in a subforum are the relevant subforum rules. In those subforum rules it is stated that this is a IC Format where your character appeals their punishment with a higher authority. With that in mind I have to agree with what bear said: Generally speaking, there are the following levels of IC Action by HR/CCIA: Informal Warning/Notice "Flavour Punishment" (i.e. "awareness training, ..." Reprimand (Temporary) Demotion optional: Suspension / other temporary removal from the ship Termination / Arrest / other permanent removal from the ship As you have already received a Reprimand and doubled down by sending "a mean letter", the next step is a (temporary) Demotion. I do not see how getting demoted to janitor after sending "a mean (ic) letter" like you did to CCIA is a "OOC Response to a IC action".
  8. Appeal denied. You were given a choice between continuing to use a ckey with neo nazi symbolism and getting banned or changing your ckey (and not getting banned). You choose the neo nazi symbolism and the ban. As such you are not welcome here.
  9. I do not think that the armor values of the suit need/should be increased from where they are right now. The captain should not get into a situation where these increased armor values are needed. After all, they have quite a few different people they can send into situations where a hostile encounter is likely. (i.e. HoS, XO, Bridge Crew, ...; depending on what needs doing) I also believe that having subpar armor and knowing that might encourage a captain to actually surrender and cooperate with the antags instead of high-tailing it out of a situation and tanking/ignoring the shots that connect.
  10. The reason is that we have had people receive CCIA actions on their characters, then delete those characters and re-create them with the same name. We have also had some people that regularly renamed one of their slots and who would then end up with ccia actions / security incidents from the previous names on that character) In addition, quite a few things are based on the character id now adays. Preventing the same name from being re-used discourages behaviour that breaks that char-id-link.
  11. As you can see the majority of the votes are in favour of it. So we keep the changes as they are. On a more serious note, there is a reason why we dont poll like that. If we want to poll this topic we will do it using our existing polling system.
  12. I also want to point out that the pirates got that ship flying by themselves. I didnt spawn/modify it in any way to get it working, so they can take off from the pirate base (And looking at the map, there is everything on the base to get it flying)
  13. We polled if people liked the round. Out of 23 people who voted 22 liked it. So I´d say the round was a success, even if it wasnt what people voted for. In addition, the vampire ahelped that they had to leave so it would have just been extended+
  14. If you wish to provide feedback do it in the already existing topics in the suggestion forum. Creating yet another feedback topic is not helpful. Therefore I am binning this topic.
×
×
  • Create New...