Jump to content

ReadThisNamePlz

Primary Administrators
  • Posts

    882
  • Joined

  • Last visited

5 Followers

Personal Information

  • Interests
    Banning people.
  • Occupation
    US Army.
  • Location
    Some space station idk

Linked Accounts

  • Byond CKey
    readthisnameplz

Recent Profile Visitors

3,103 profile views

ReadThisNamePlz's Achievements

Syndicate Agent

Syndicate Agent (32/37)

  1. I graduate University in 4 weeks. It's wild that I started playing here in middle school. 

  2. This report has been binned due to OOC concerns. I will reach out to the necessary parties tomorrow.
  3. I meant to close this a few days ago, but since it has sat for a week with no necessary followup - I will close it now.
  4. I do not trust players to self regulate. That may be rude, but I have been here too long to think I that if we give someone a chance at something new, and go “don’t use it” - eventually they’ll use it.
  5. Hey, I suppose I’ll speak on this. I’m not a maintainer, so ultimately it will be up to them. AI is a tool. Yes. It’s purpose is to act like a support system to the crew and command, etc. I’ve covered this in a recent complaint. However, it having accents is fine. I do not want to see AI with Dominian accents, or even native silver tongue accents. These two are pretty niche, whereas AIs should not have niche appearances. With all of that said, the lack of some of the mentioned accents is not intentional to my knowledge. I think as new accents were added, there was just an oversight. Accents should really be used to indicate where the SCC acquired the AI from or maybe to cater to the crew majority that is on shift. Like a lot of Solarians would be happy with a Earth accent, or vice versa with Biesellites But again, to be entirely honest, I do not want to see niche accents being used by AI because the background of a lot of those accents could be points of contention for the crew. Silversunners don’t like Idris, Dominians dont like..well, AI, Trinarist is strictly IPC. I’d be fine with a Galatian model.
  6. Hello, @eddymakaveli and I are handling this. I need input from @Fluffy I also need to know if you @La Villa Strangiato or the player of Levi Kersaavi have ever explicitly asked oocly to not misgender your characters. The interaction in the discord isn’t sufficient enough for this. If you did ask, I need the evidence posted here.
  7. Hi, Juani. It's really good to see you here. Sorry for the lack of response, we've been busy. Let's get down to business. I'm going to deny your application, for now. The application itself is good. You hit all of our boxes, and I remember when you were staff here - No one has said anything negative or done anything that would prevent you from being picked up as a moderator. The only issue is your activity. If you increase your activity, and then re-applied, we can definitely get an interview done. I'm going off of the fact that according to the W.I, you haven't been on since 3/02/2024. Reach out to me on discord at MiniMooseTM if you have any questions.
  8. Wonderful. I want to clarify that you're free to keep playing Paladin (using the name), just lighten up on the medieval aspect.
  9. Hi, I'm the Lead for the AI Whitelist team. I am also the person who issued this ruling. I have not seen this AI used in some time, and if I was online to see this happening then I would have messaged you myself. The name is fine. Here is the official ruling - "I do not care if they play an AI named "Paladin" but the medieval personality, referring to things as the "SCC Kingdom", "Artificial Guardian", "SCC Lords", etc just isn't what we should be seeing from an AI. It's a tool, not a character. I think some personality is fine, but they should not have an overly-personable gimmick." - From me directly. Does this help you understand what the AI team wants from AI? The AI should be a tool, a system. Think of the V.I from Mass Effect. We want more V.I's, not AI's like Cortana or Black Box from Halo.
  10. 1. The change in January is something that was made official across the staff teams. Before hand, we had flexibility to unban people with two permanent bans - case by case. Though it was extremely rare. 2. Anything you have to say about this should be said here, as it is a complaint against my ruling. 3. The entirety of this can be summed up as follows - You powergamed. You admitted to powergaming. You have an extensive history of this. So I banned you. You are right, a lot of your previous actions are older, but the fact that you still did this means that you haven’t learned in the 4, almost 5 years that you’ve played here. I don’t care if you’re unbanned or not, but it shouldn’t take anyone two permanent bans to learn the standards and rules we have here. Especially after being here for (almost) five years. side note: on painkillers rn so sorry if this reads strangely
  11. you're just another Rooster crony!!!!!!11!1!1!!
  12. thisis one of @Roostercat's meta buddies who are clearly here to dogpile me, I'm the victim once again
  13. BYOND Key: ReadThisNamePlz Staff BYOND Key: Roostercat Game ID: idk Reason for complaint: Bullying me for no reason. This is a clear and blatant attack on my character here. I don't deserve this and I think Rooster should be sent straight to jail. Additional remarks: plz ban
×
×
  • Create New...