Jump to content
Scheveningen

[Retracted] IPC Species Maintainer - Scheveningen

Recommended Posts

I can't vouch for Schev's lore writing abilities. I've read it, and I think it's great, but it isn't up to me to decide if it fits and works.

What I can tell you is I'd feel COMFORTABLE with going to Schev about IPC issues, verses others that have applied. They give off that sort of personality that, to me, is pretty approachable. I like how Schev works.

Share this post


Link to post

If we're giving our simple personal opinions on Schev as a person, then I have to regrettably state my opinion is the opposite of Satins's. I would feel very uncomfortable with Schev on the team. I do not feel Schev is an approachable, friendly, or even tolerant person. I find them often abrasive, and very hard to speak with. In fact I have had to have Schev blocked for literal months because he would try to bait me in public. I avoid Schev as much as possible. If Schev were on the IPC lore team, I would actively seek someone else to approach about my concerns and issues, because I am not comfortable talking to Schev in most situations.

Share this post


Link to post
15 minutes ago, zyymurgy said:

In fact I have had to have Schev blocked for literal months because he would try to bait me in public.

It's morein been months since the two of us have actually directly spoken to one another over discord, considering we had one another blocked for quite awhile. If you want to discuss specifics over discord DMs then hmu, if not then I respect that and won't have an issue with it.

Share this post


Link to post

Lets keep this on topic, if there is further tossing of insults/accusations then you are going to be warned, as this is your warning. Keep it relevant or dont post

Share this post


Link to post
7 minutes ago, DRagO said:

Lets keep this on topic, if there is further tossing of insults/accusations then you are going to be warned, as this is your warning. Keep it relevant or dont post

This is on topic. I am discussing his behavior, and I am of the same mind of Zymurgy, I cannot see myself going to Schev for anything, since he goes out of his way to confront people in DMs over round actions as he did me. Over the course of my posts, I believe Schevs behavior has not changed, they have simply gotten better at hiding it.  This accusing me in DMs happened a month ago, not years ago. Players should not seek reprisal themselves, least of all should they harass someone on discord. Admins exist for that reason.

Edited by Bygonehero

Share this post


Link to post

I didn't accuse you. In fact, the situation you're talking about is something you got permanently banned from the server for (you know, harassing my friend and abusing your role as AI, and then giving ahelps a major blasting?), because I gave structured pieces of evidence that the administrators decided to compile with additional log-diving, and they believed it was in the best interest of the community to permanently ban you with a four-week appeal limit.

https://forums.aurorastation.org/topic/12715-player-complaint-contextualpennant

There's a particular conflict of interest that I've identified at this point because you're attempting to stick this fear that I'll lash out with retribution against anyone I don't happen to like. Not only do I not care enough about grudges to even do that, but you're assuming what I will do based on what you got permanently banned for. The worst part is that you claimed to have apologized to me for that situation and that it was all supposed to be water under the bridge on both sides, but now that I know you still harbor issues about that, it isn't just water under the bridge.

Share this post


Link to post
2 hours ago, Scheveningen said:

I didn't accuse you. In fact, the situation you're talking about is something you got permanently banned from the server for (you know, harassing my friend and abusing your role as AI, and then giving ahelps a major blasting?), because I gave structured pieces of evidence that the administrators decided to compile with additional log-diving, and they believed it was in the best interest of the community to permanently ban you with a four-week appeal limit.

https://forums.aurorastation.org/topic/12715-player-complaint-contextualpennant

There's a particular conflict of interest that I've identified at this point because you're attempting to stick this fear that I'll lash out with retribution against anyone I don't happen to like. Not only do I not care enough about grudges to even do that, but you're assuming what I will do based on what you got permanently banned for. The worst part is that you claimed to have apologized to me for that situation and that it was all supposed to be water under the bridge on both sides, but now that I know you still harbor issues about that, it isn't just water under the bridge.

You entered DMs with me telling me I was wrong for doing things that round. Imagine if every admin or lore dev did that because they don't like what someone did to them in round. It is very much accusing, and giving you more power to act on it is something that I can't see doing. As for the apology on my end, it was a truthful one, but I just don't see you being acceptable lore staff When there are rules about reprisals and behavior more stricter than normal. There is a difference between accepting you and yours as a person and accepting you and yours as a lore staff. The former I have done so, the latter I have not. 

Share this post


Link to post
7 minutes ago, Bygonehero said:

You entered DMs with me telling me I was wrong for doing things that round.

To which not only did Contextual and I (who quite literally were doing nothing wrong and there was no reason for you to force yourself between our characters interacting) disagreed, but after review of the administrators they believed you did wrong for things you did that round. I mostly find it ridiculous that your only point you're trying to drive here is to complain about the tone I held with you after you essentially metagrudged me and Contextual because you saw something that happened that you didn't like. If that were to happen to anyone else in this community I wouldn't be demanding they be all sugary, spice and nice either.

Share this post


Link to post
4 minutes ago, Scheveningen said:

To which not only did Contextual and I (who quite literally were doing nothing wrong and there was no reason for you to force yourself between our characters interacting) disagreed, but after review of the administrators they believed you did wrong for things you did that round. I mostly find it ridiculous that your only point you're trying to drive here is to complain about the tone I held with you after you essentially metagrudged me and Contextual because you saw something that happened that you didn't like. If that were to happen to anyone else in this community I wouldn't be demanding they be all sugary, spice and nice either.

I was not banned for metagrudging. Were you an admin with the facts, you would know this but instead, and this is the biggest problem with you schev, you assume you know things, despite not having evidence towards it. I believe at this point nothing good can come from continued discussion about this. I have said my peace. 

Edited by Bygonehero

Share this post


Link to post

Was going to give a +1, but I'm changing it to neutral after being baited by Bygone, ignoring the moderator asking not to derail it, and then continuing the issue into a different thread. Sometimes, Schev, you gotta let it roll off your back. I can't know that your behavior will be sound as a Lore Dev, but I don't know how much of an effect Bygone has specifically, so I'm unsure.

Good luck regardless.

Share this post


Link to post

image.png.cc78a76ddd2e2fe80973c92992b8ce31.png
 

Quote

The usual response to this kind of synth play would be a straight up ban from that role. Given the fact that you clearly used IC means to take out your own OOC issues on them baffles me. You where caught doing shit, you where asked about why you are doing shit and your solution was to blame it all on another player. First ICly, followed OOCly in the ahelp and now on the forums.
In addition your notes paint a really clear picture about you not keeping IC issues out of OOC and raging / salting frequently makes me question why you are not banned from OOC chat by now. Doing it the other way as you did in this round shows me that you have trouble dividing the two. You managed to ruin the round for someone who mainly plays as stationbound up to a point where they outright asked in the ahelp if your AI behavior was acceptable for this server and that they wouldn't bother to play as a stationbound anymore if it was.

Statement made by Cnaym. Just because the ban message isn't specific doesn't mean you were not banned for it. This is the last message I'm replying to you specifically, Bygone, but please stop attempting to bait.

Edited by Scheveningen

Share this post


Link to post

Application retracted.

 

Locking per request of OP. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...