Jump to content
Arrow768

Maint Access Changes

Recommended Posts

Praise. I would also suggest some sort of re-mapping so that Assistants can access the Commissary. I've grown more comfortable with this maintenance PR as time goes on (though everyone knows I fought it into the dirt when it was first announced), and this is a good reconciliatory step based on public opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
20 minutes ago, Natiform said:

i'm just gonna throw my two cents in as a QM main:

i'm not really sure where this PR is headed, a lot of people seem upset with it based on what i've skimmed in this post- but if we DO end up keeping it in one way or another, can QMs at least be given disposal access again? i know QM's aren't a real head or anything, but i've seen multiple rounds now where a package isn't tagged correctly and ends up in the compactor with no un-frustrating way to retrieve it. because unless it's for a department that has access, that package is basically lost because "who would wanna go all the way to the compactor for one little thing?" and since QMs are right there, they should have a way to fix the errors of their department without having to drag someone all the way from engineering.

Cargo can access the crusher by going through the shorting office's maint access.

Share this post


Link to post
19 minutes ago, Alberyk said:

Cargo can access the crusher by going through the shorting office's maint access.

thats what i get for posting right after waking up

Share this post


Link to post

I really like this change. Ive interacted with sec officers more and explored maint with them at their request. Or if they annoy me ic i "accidentally" shut a door and get lost, leaving them stranded for a few minutes before i pick them up again.

Having all access to maint via a head swipe would be sick

Share this post


Link to post
Just now, AmoryBlaine said:

So most people prefer the old way. When is this being reverted?

Because about half the people are in favor of keeping the system (with adaptations)

Share this post


Link to post
1 minute ago, Arrow768 said:

Because about half the people are in favor of keeping the system (with adaptations)

With the addition of allowing easier means for Command to give all access? Anything else?

Share this post


Link to post
1 minute ago, AmoryBlaine said:

With the addition of allowing easier means for Command to give all access? Anything else?

Which is being implemented, as I already posted.

Share this post


Link to post
1 minute ago, Arrow768 said:

Which is being implemented, as I already posted.

 

3 minutes ago, AmoryBlaine said:

With the addition of allowing easier means for Command to give all access? Anything else?

 

Share this post


Link to post
6 minutes ago, Dark1Star said:

50 people wanted adapatations, /80/ wanted it reverted...

And 29 liked it as is, which is another almost 30 who aren't in favor of a revert.

Share this post


Link to post
2 minutes ago, Dark1Star said:

50 people wanted adapatations, /80/ wanted it reverted...

29 People prefer the current system.
51 People prefer the current system with adaptations
If we sum that up, we are at 80 people.
Those are 44% of the total number of people that voted.

87 People prefer the old system.
Those are 48% of the total number of people that voted.

The difference between those numbers is just 4%, so the decision if it stays or goes will be made by the headmins/devs.

Regarding the last post by @AmoryBlaine : I have no idea what you are asking there.

Share this post


Link to post
Just now, Arrow768 said:

29 People prefer the current system.
51 People prefer the current system with adaptations
If we sum that up, we are at 80 people.
Those are 44% of the total number of people that voted.

87 People prefer the old system.
Those are 48% of the total number of people that voted.

The difference between those numbers is just 4%, so the decision if it stays or goes will be made by the headmins/devs.

Regarding the last post by @AmoryBlaine : I have no idea what you are asking there.

I am asking, what other additions are being made. Because the only additional PR, does not sate what I want, which is a revert- What half of the voters wanted.

Share this post


Link to post
17 minutes ago, AmoryBlaine said:

I am asking, what other additions are being made. Because the only additional PR, does not sate what I want, which is a revert- What half of the voters wanted.

Well, half of the people wanted a reevert and the other half want it to be kept, that isnt sufficient for a immediate revert.
The difference between those two groups is statistically insignificant (due to our small sample size of 180)

The above mentioned PR will be merged once it´s reviewed and then we´ll see how that worked out and if additional changes are needed.

Share this post


Link to post
1 minute ago, Arrow768 said:

Well, half of the people wanted a reevert and the other half want it to be kept, that isnt sufficient for a immediate revert.

The above mentioned PR will be merged once it´s reviewed and then we´ll see how that worked out and if additional changes are needed.

So there's no other ideas for it?

Share this post


Link to post
Just now, AmoryBlaine said:

So there's no other ideas for it?

No, not until the new PR has been merged and live for a while.

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...