Butterrobber202 Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 Basically. Smoking in Medical or other areas with signs like this, telling you not to do something, if you do it, i120 is broken and you serve 5 minutes in da slammer. open to a better description. Link to comment
ViolentHAM Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 Kinda agree. Let it be illegal again. Link to comment
sonicgotnuked Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 Can't you tell them to fuck off, then if they don't you can charge with ignoring orders? Link to comment
Faris Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 Fairly sure this would be a violation of injunction? So an infraction is already present for it. Link to comment
Azande Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 You can charge someone under various charges for refusing to stop smoking in designated areas. Link to comment
ShameOnTurtles Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 There are actually a couple regulations this falls under. For one, as Aboshehab said, you could put it under violating an injunction. It could also be put under neglect of duty. If a doctor is smoking in the medical bay and refuses to stop upon request, he definitely deserves that charge. Alternatively, if a head of staff ordered that doctor to stop smoking, then a charge of failure to execute an order would also apply. You could also argue that security ordering someone to stop smoking in a no smoking area counts as a valid order, but the regulation does say "a superior's valid orders." Link to comment
Guest Marlon Phoenix Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 There are several "catch-all" regulations that already exist to punish these behaviors. It is my view that it is better to enforce the catch-alls rather than create additional regulations because then we end up with redundancy. Link to comment
Arrow768 Posted August 2, 2017 Share Posted August 2, 2017 I am voting for dismissal since this is already covered by multiple other regulations and not really a development issue Link to comment
Skull132 Posted August 6, 2017 Share Posted August 6, 2017 It's been a week! +1 dismissal for reasons already pointed out: there exist charges + injunctions to cover this. Apply them. Archived. Link to comment
Recommended Posts