Of course.
Robots, at least robots that aren't particularly well-adjusted to the ins and outs of social life (take, for example, a bartender IPC in a seedy dive bar) have a tendency to think in a very binary way: either something is something or it is not. Metaphors are often lost in translation, and emotions are likely adapted after extensive interactions with other sapient beings. In an odd sort of way, IPC culture is effectively parroting what is observed around it. An IPC that is abruptly fired from its job following purchase of freedom (like Sophocles) may be only experiencing despair for the first time after being fired, and may not understand why it feels such a way. There is also the issue of religion- specifically, whether or not something that is imperceptible can exist in the mind of a synthetic. Whereas a human has the ability to have faith without necessarily having concrete evidence, a robot is more likely to require facts and evidence to accept the existence of something as fact. (As an extra little bit, here, it should also be noted that IPCs that don't often interact with other IPCs but often interact with organics would likely be completely unaware of most IPC slang terms, which could cause a disconnect between their synthetic nature and their adopted organic culture).
This also extends to how IPCs are treated in the setting- created, programmed, given a few weeks of training, and put to work without wasting a moment. Because they're considered subsapient by most companies and factions, they're often paid lower wages and generally treated (literally) as property due to their mass-producible nature and artificial origins. Effectively, IPCs are the indentured servants of the factions- slaving away for their masters, some to achieve the theoretical goal of freedom- those who get it are left worse off than when they started and often wonder if the price was worth it.
Another important tidbit of information relating to the setting is the fact that IPCs live in constant fear of being reset- considering it's both safer and cheaper to completely wipe the IPC's memory, it would benefit most IPCs to avoid standing out in any way other than excellence, as corporations like Zavodskoi would be more likely to overlook them during routine wipes than they would be if they otherwise developed a full personality.
Lastly, the way IPCs interact with other people can be dictated by programming that the IPC cannot change- an IRU for example might form a friendship, but the underlying code in its system might prevent it from being able to separate business interactions from social interactions, while an average Idris service IPC like Sophocles would more likely be coded very loosely to facilitate better interactions with people and generate repeat customers- though, let's face it, if they're at a bar, they're probably going to come back anyway..