tomatik

BYOND Key: tomatik Total Ban Length: It happened alright Banning staff member's Key: melariara Reason of Ban: Exploded central ring, then exploded medical, effectively ending the round for many at only a hour in despite being told in January to not use explosions like this. Insisted they could go louder if they wanted. You may appeal this on the forums Reason for Appeal: The whole idea from the get-go was faulty, and so was the execution. Blowing up multiple large-scale bombs in a public setting could've been alright with enough buildup, or any, for that matter. The remotes got switched up and instead of doing 2 explosions, it ended up being 3, which is subpar to say the least. There are a thousand things that could've been done differently and nearly all of them would've improved the whole ordeal. The situation got complicated quickly, pretty much everything that could've gotten worse, did. I could get witnesses to affirm that, like Ambrose and Unioncap who were also there and saw how it was completely FUBAR from the setup stage. Ambrose spent the roundend apologizing profusely and i can see why. The whole thing wasn't that fun for anyone involved. I would still love to get back to antagonism on the server, being a moving force of the round doesn't necessarily bode well with going nuclear and ending the round an hour in. TLDR: Round removing 19/20 people 45 minutes into the round as borderline solo antag with no buildup isn't good or cool or fun.

BYOND Key: tomatik Total Ban Length: permanent Banning staff member's Key: mattatlas Reason of Ban: Consistent terrible attitude, appeal this ban when you decide to change how you approach the server. Reason for Appeal: i decided to change how i approach the server. As it stood at the point in which it happened, the relevant parties were contracted, apologies were issued where necessary and there did not seem to be any bad blood between the parties. I do now understand that i may have come off a bit too harsh, a bit too crude, be it as it were, my own dissatisfaction with the system in place and lack of knowledge on how it changed made the discussion a bit heated, i have been pointed out that as things stand now the things are quite different, and i fully admit to being in the wrong.

fixed

BYOND Key: Tomatik Total Ban Length: until appeal Banning staff member's Key: Wyickedcybs Reason of Ban: Your conduct in medical roles has been quite bad and you have spoken to in the past regarding it. We#39ll need to see how you play outside of these roles before allowing you to play them again. Reason for Appeal: It's been a while, over a year ago. Getting into science, actually got me to look back on how I acted back then, which really wasn't great, I can definitely see why there was a need to take action. I mean I really was an inconsiderate, pushy and very much mean spirited asshole, I really did go way over my own qualifications and the proper station, it's not surprising others didn't find it fun at all. I am actually sorry for that. In 30+ shifts overall in science I haven't been talked once regarding my roleplay or the character itself, which is good, I think. Actually managed to somewhat connect with folks maining science, but even with that, I would really like to try getting into medical again, I really enjoyed playing there. If this passes Really hope I could connect with medical the same way I did with science

The wording goes as follows, "if you keep voting" and i haven't been voting since, i have also agreed to the terms given to me in a demand

You forgot to address the actual reason for the complaint, which is, the actual demand presented in the ticket, the followed compliance, and how he still went through with it. while i agree with the OOC part, that shouldn't still allow for intentional misleading in ahelps. And i would've agreed if not for the bwoink, the bwoink and its contents are the issue here.

You are not addressing what i've said. You drifted away from my quote and said things of your very own that were completely detached from my words. You are presenting me in worse light than i actually was. What you're doing here is poor tone. Please address the actual words said. It's anything but, if you were to make the demand in OOC, that could've been plausable, instead you made the demand mere seconds before the vote ended, as you have admitted it yourself. Are you genuinely giving out punishment based on presumptions? Is that how staff is supposed to act? base their judgement and their actions solely on presumtions and wild guesses? Except i didn't, there's nothing in the rules that reads as follows "you are not allowed to vote" And even then, you said so yourself here: As such it would appear to me that you have made a "rule" on the spot and decided to warn me for something that did not exist two minutes prior. Except i didn't get the chance to "opt in", you sent me a message a few seconds before the vote ended with a demand and consequences, and then immedately struck me with said consequences, that's misleading, and as much as you present it with being "fair", i can only presume it was intentional It quite literally only matters when others are doing the same thing, that's how voting works, it's a group action, it can only work as long as there are others involved. There weren't 10-15 players there at the time, there were 6-8, with only 2 of them being ready. There were neither 4 memevoters nor were there 10-15 people at the time, will ask you to prove otherwise. I, by myself, coudn't have possibly held up a round four times with a vote, if we were to take your version of there actually being 15 people, how come they didn't vote for anything but meteor? How come staff is allowed to take punitive action based solely on presumtions and dirty tricks, such as sending a message with a demand mere seconds before the demand expires? if anything it just seems like an excuse to give out a warning with little ground to cover it Seeing as our retelling of the events varies drastically, i am urging you to find logs for the round, at least for the very start, as i refuse to believe that with your claim that there were in fact 15 people, and just three meteor votes could overthrow them seems unlikely to say the least. Previous actions just seem like an excuse to escalate punitive measures, seeing as there was no actual need for punitive measures, as i have agreed to the demand. I cooperated with the ahelp, and yet you still issued a warning, that is not what you promted, neither was it what i agreed on. You misled me on purpose. That is also not what the ahelp said, your direct word was "keep memevoting meteor", there wasn't even an actual need to act on what you've said, i did not "keep voting meteor" after you asked me. I was voting BEFORE you opened a ticket with me, i never voted meteor after. Are you just not being true to your word?

There weren't, it was just me and another scientist, that's all. There were, however, at most 4 players within the round itself, some joined some left, to say they were all readied initially would be wrong. Two more players also voted for meteor, do you imply that if an admin expresses discontent for a mode, they're allowed to give out warnings to anyone they don't particularly like? You are the one sending the message, it was perfectly within your grasp, you punch in the letter, you send out messages So that "beforehand" was literally seconds away? How is that fair? How is it fair that you meant for me to understand that you wanted me to read the message and then to retract the vote within *seconds* of you doing it? You even yourself admit that it's not, you really didn't give me *any* time to act, so instead you acted yourself and went through with your demand Were you to give me ample time to actually react, i would've retracted my vote, it's not a thing i've done out of malice So you don't even know if *i* was voting? You issued a warning with no ground? You also put it in a way that makes it sound like i voted for meteor all 4 times, as if i was single-handedly doing it It would've even without me. There were two more people voting for it. It wouldn't have beaten anything else, with one vote at best. There were, after all, just two people readied up, one of which was me. Was there anyone else you struck with a warning at the time? Did you single me out for calling you fun police? As the warning says "This just keeps people who may want to play from playing." I was, in fact, wanting to play, i was readied up, and i have played through the entire round, in fact, i was the only person to do so in that round, so that begs the question If it frustrated *you*, why didn't you play in the round? Why didn't anyone else? How come it was just me?

BYOND Key: Tomatik Staff BYOND Key: Sadkermit Game ID: cxw-cPJ6 Reason for complaint: As it was presented, it's an "if" scenario, "if you do so, consequences happen", And thus i fail to see how i was anything, but intentionaly misled. After some consideration, "holding up a round" for two people ready, one of which was me, being warned despite the agreeing to the terms presented seems like an unfair misue of my trust, it's barely a violation of any rules, as far as i know, and it was a deadshift at that Evidence/logs/etc: Additional remarks: There were three people voting for meteor at the time, there were only two people ready, one of whom was me. Who am i holding up from playing but me and one other person? Even if it was, solely me, holding up the round, for what, six minutes at most, total?

Reporting Personnel: Kroner Blackburn Job Title of Reporting Personnel: Xenobiologist Game ID: cuD-aisg Personnel Involved: Sasha Kaiser (Research Director), Offender Kroner Blackburn (Xenobiologist), Victim Suvek Tokash (Head of Security), Witness Secondary Witnesses: Seamus Whelan (Security Cadet), Was present during the arrest, made a statement. Yoshi Haruno (Warden), Was present during processing, made a statement. Time of Incident: Real Time: 2024-07-10 02:43:40 Location of Incident: Xenobiology Lab Nature of Incident: [x] - Workplace Hazard [ ] - Accident/Injury [ ] - Destruction of Property [x] - Neglect of Duty [x] - Harassment [ ] - Assault [x] - Misconduct Overview of the Incident: The events, from my perspective are as follows: an hour into the shift, working on my current assignment, Director Kaiser wakes up, immediatly starts accusing me of lacking diligence with questions like "are you actually going to work today?" and "How hard is it to do your job?", While i was working. After a short back-and-fourth in which he got increasingly more agressive, he was informed that i was, in fact, doing my job. He then proceeded to call me, quote, "Fucking dense" and a "deadweight", it's unprofessional and unbefitting of anyone in Command. Afterwards, Jiaxing Volvalaad, Archeologist woke up, and after hearing us talk, decided to step in to correct the situation somewhat, which did raise good points on shortcomings both me and Kaiser had. But clearing things out, or keepin the department productive for that matter, wasn't something that Kaiser wanted, and as such, he had called the entire security team to unlawfully demote and arrest me for i111, "disobeying orders" which i never recieved, but on that later. I was messaged by the security and began securing the slimes in containment to prevent future breaches, during this time, Kaiser barged in with three officers waiting after open doors, right in the Foyer, no protective equipment, no water, nothing, potentially exposing them and himself to the slimes, i was in the middle of securing them, one of the pens was open as he barged in. He then unceremoniously took the radio and the ID, afterwards returning it to security. In processing it was found out that the unspoken order i was demoted for would be "failed to start a project", despite him being informed of two projects being performed at the time, after an incredibly short investigation, the charges were dropped, the arrest was scrubbed from the system, it was deemed an abuse of power and a gross attempt to use security forces to deal with internal matters. This revelation was to surprise of no-one but me, as Security Chief said, he knew of Kaiser and his reputation, after releasing me with no charges, he told me to take it up with central, as i am doing right now. It would seem that keeping the department running is not a priority for Kaiser, as he is more set on going after and verbally degrading his subjects, than actually fulfilling his duties. Submitted Evidence: Would you like to be personally interviewed?: [x] - Yes [ ] - No Did you report it to a Head of Staff or a superior? If so, who? If not, why?: Suvek Tokash was informed of the situation and was present during the processing. Actions taken: None Additional Notes: This is not the first time Kaiser acted this way, and he is well known across the entire ship for being rude and offensive, he has called me a "moron", an "idiot" and "a fucking imbecille" over the comms before, but it didn't seem like something to report at the time.

I would also like to go into detail on what exactly was done Case-to-case basis would be great, generalized statements provided aren't the best for figuring such things out. It'd be helpful to avoid such things in the future, even if the complaint goes nowhere(c'mon, this isn't getting any traction, we all know this), and i do have questions, such as; You mentioned "ooc jokes flavoured into IC jokes", and i fail really connect any dots with that, if you could elaborate, that would be lovely. Another one is "Clearly identified pattern", if it was a thing, why wasn't i informed of such a pattern forming? Surely if it's enough grounds for capital action, it should've been enough grounds for a lesser intervention anyway, this is my excuse for a bump