Nightmare

BYOND Key: Nightmare 00 Staff BYOND Key: Garnascus Reason for complaint: This complaint is about Garnascus' over use of muting channels anytime a conversation or any type of disagreement comes up. For example, if one person is over complaining in Deadchat he will mute the entire Deadchat for most of the remainder of the round. When this happened once or twice, whatever. But when other people are constantly being punished because staff don't realize that they can mute solo people it becomes extremely annoying; I would like this muting the entire channel thing to be reviewed or looked over somehow. People should not be punished because of what others do on as common as it is happening. Evidence/logs/etc: (Currently trying to get logs; will input as I get them.) Additional remarks: Getting muted because one or two people are complaining is annoying. That is why it is possible to mute players and not others.

Nah, I'd rather not go do something else. Instead, I like the idea of being able to do something else in game that's enjoyable. I'm not down with people getting punished OOCly just for IC actions, especially if its not griefy or whatever. For more minor situations of course, not like murder or whatever

No im asking if trying to make more to be arrested sitting in a 2x3 box, and being forgetten about more enjoyable oocly is a bad thing.

So its not suppose to be fun, so just so I understand; if you do an IC crime you should be punished OOCLY by sitting and being forgotten in a cell with nothing to do?

Just so you know, Gamegod don't make it sound like Nasir actually said that. What he said was "If He was disloyal, he would have released the singularity to kill you all." So yeah, you might be somewhat mistaken.

I still don't see where it was okay for you, as a Director to suddenly go out and shoot the windows out of the pod near the end of the round. I don't see where any logic falls to that, what were you hoping to get by this? Katelynn has been reported time and time again for hunting possible antags with weapons. You asked Akela why we were not in departures, and she told you ERT said to stay, I don't think that means "Oh let me go shoot out their pods and get into a shoot out with them" as a director. Unless im missing something

Because im apart of this, i'd like to paste this before Alberky starts saying that him and Aleka traded shots https://gyazo.com/b0fa7256c1d373d345e5d4bb6d0263e7 Akela fired once after getting shot at a bunch of times and ran out of ammo.

Yes, there is player leadership and character leadership. Are we not talking about Character leadership? Because clearly the character that would be CE is Manfred. Do I think Nikov could be a good leader? No clue, do I think that Manfred could? As far from what ive seen no. So it really depends on if we're giving whitelist to the player or the character to me.

I generally don't post on whitelist apps, but I have to strongly agree with Nibbles. Knowledge of the department itself aside, I feel that heads of staffs need to be good leaders. I just don't see Manfred as the leadership type.

There are minor differences between Tajara beating up people for racism, and a loyalty implanted captain being racist. Just minor differences, with the main one being that fight between the people (tajara and racist) are 8/10 shut down by sec before they start. Or the two people can avoid each other. You cannot avoid a captain deciding that you are the one he decides to fuck with, which is why they are held to a standard. If you want to be racist fine, but being a racist captain who's job it is to keep the station under control I do not think is fine. And its going to be annoying if every single time I see this captain, we have to ask sec to arrest them for name slandering, which 9/10 they will probably not be arrested. And even if they are, then they get out of the brig, to go back to being racist and being /back/ in the brig. And that's assuming sec even decides to go against them

There are minor differences between Tajara beating up people for racism, and a loyalty implanted captain being racist. Just minor differences, with the main one being that fight between the people (tajara and racist) are 8/10 shut down by sec before they start. Or the two people can avoid each other. You cannot avoid a captain deciding that you are the one he decides to fuck with, which is why they are held to a standard. If you want to be racist fine, but being a racist captain who's job it is to keep the station under control I do not think is fine. And its going to be annoying if every single time I see this captain, we have to ask sec to arrest them for name slandering, which 9/10 they will probably not be arrested. And even if they are, then they get out of the brig, to go back to being racist and being /back/ in the brig. And that's assuming sec even decides to go against them

So we're allowed to kill people who speak another language over comms? Purrrrfect. And yes, Tajara could be widely discriminated, as you say. But I do not think that NanoTrasen would openly promote that, you won't be able to convince me of that. And Tajara were discovered and taken in about 100 years ago? So, I don't think that any current captain (this one in particular) would be in post before hand. No one wants a free pass, but being openly racist like that makes no sense in a professional setting. Discriminated or not

So we're allowed to kill people who speak another language over comms? Purrrrfect. And yes, Tajara could be widely discriminated, as you say. But I do not think that NanoTrasen would openly promote that, you won't be able to convince me of that. And Tajara were discovered and taken in about 100 years ago? So, I don't think that any current captain (this one in particular) would be in post before hand. No one wants a free pass, but being openly racist like that makes no sense in a professional setting. Discriminated or not

Not this round, Garnascus. I was speaking on the pervious round where OOC got muted because of how extreme the complaints got. There were plenty of slurs. And while racism exist how do you figure that it would exist to be so blunt. Not even alittle subtle. Correct me if im wrong, but a captain would have to go through a lot of background test, and have a lot of psychological testing? I'm not completely convinced that an openly racist would be allowed to be put in charge of a station that has a heavy population of alien staff. That does not seem to work in the interest of nt to me

Not this round, Garnascus. I was speaking on the pervious round where OOC got muted because of how extreme the complaints got. There were plenty of slurs. And while racism exist how do you figure that it would exist to be so blunt. Not even alittle subtle. Correct me if im wrong, but a captain would have to go through a lot of background test, and have a lot of psychological testing? I'm not completely convinced that an openly racist would be allowed to be put in charge of a station that has a heavy population of alien staff. That does not seem to work in the interest of nt to me