OmegaZip2

I believe allowing circuits to interact with machinery could be a great way to make what is a (right now) kind of seperate and isolated system, into just a deeper form of machine building. For example, we currently have a device which can be attached to other devices. As far as I know, this device cannot be attached to any machine; how COOL could it be to use one of these as a sort of pocket hacking tool, attaching it to a door and letting it pulse the wires automatically? Or maybe using it as a keycard. Or even, allowing a slot machine to be connected to a server which stores all the winners and lists them off on a leaderboard, or even announces them on the radio. Or a circuit to handle more complex calculation, like with teleporters, linked up to the console to handle all the work for the scientists. Of course this is AMBITIOUS and *TIME CONSUMING LIKE NO OTHER FEATURE* but I think it could merge the two systems into something that could make circuits go from "those ten crazy designs that help you" to a full sandbox system, which promotes creativity and ingenuity (and fun) instead of just building one or two isolated pre-set designs which do some niche function.

As of right now, the robotic arm circuit assembly has no real use; it can draw or give power to the grid its on. What kind of use is that for a robotic arm? It is completely unfitting Instead, I believe such a unique looking assembly should also have a similairly unique use: the ability to interact with items. It could range from simply moving them around to using machinery (these could be split up into different circuits). This would allow large automation belts to be set up, for all the factorio lovers on the server, or just some funny minigames.

Exactly what I'm talking about! I say i'm "messing" with them just as informal speak, I enjoy automation and the overall quality they bring to the game (and also all the various subterfuge that can be done with it, hint hint, giving someone a "wire"). The lock mechanic covers the sign mechanic you talk about! Circuit designs could be handled as proper patented blueprints.

This is mostly a player quality deal, players themselves should promote inventive and creativity. What is a scientist that doesn't experiment? This could be also handled mechanically, but i'm no dev, so I can't really speak on it, but I spoke about the lock mechanic for this reason!

As of late i've been tinkering with the Aurora circuits, and I must say they are very fun. The one issue that I find with them is that they are designed in a manner that allows them to pretty much only be one-offs or otherwise only serve their creator. This is due to the fact that circuits take a long time to set up and wire. This can be fixed by introducing Bay's Circuit analyzer (or a similair machine) which saves circuits as a long string of text which can be inputted to print out the circuit. This makes it so the player still has to build and get the circuit working while still letting them interact with the other players, and not be relegated to the lab for the entire round as they build the device for the 3rd time, taking so long that it won't even be used in any meaningful matter. This also allows for much more complex circuitry, letting people tinker on round to round, letting them build machinery that would otherwise be impossible to make as it would simply require too much time. But some machinery is obviously intended just to push the game a bit for fun, and is never to be touched again (blood drain bots, super bomb drones, other weaponized circuits), and are usually made just to test out the concept. As such, to avoid them falling into malicious hands, a lock mechanic could be introduced, where the design cannot be copied without the approval of the owner. This mechanic allows scientists to show their designs without fear of being blamed for something they have no control over. Those who wish to grief don't require circuits as there are much less complex ways, and those who wish to grief effortlessly with circuits can just set up a macro to build the deathmachines for them. For antagonists, they could be put under the "Rule Of Cool", making an army of robots that shoots the entire crew dead is efficient, but is extremely unfun for the crew who can only sit and watch as an infinite amount of enemies tear everything down, and as such shouldn't be done.