Nagito Komaeda Posted March 3 Posted March 3 (edited) Reporting Personnel: Uskiro Kisisril Job Title of Reporting Personnel: Machinist Game ID: cyr-c9QC Personnel Involved: Zaqix Zixquu, Research Director - Offender Qiang Pei, Captain - Offender Positronic unit 'GPPU-06' - Victim Uskiro Kisisril, Machinist - Witness Jonathan Moorland, Machinist - Witness Secondary Witnesses: Armand Gessler, Operations Manager - Confirmed the order of the Captain to force us to participate in the experiment. Lysandre Depardieu-Bodin, Head of Security - Confirmed the legality of the experiment, informed us of the credit costs. Time of Incident: 20:30 Real Time: 21:30 GMT+1, 03/03/2025 Location of Incident: Machinist Workshop Nature of Incident: [ ] - Workplace Hazard [ ] - Accident/Injury [X] - Destruction of Property [ ] - Neglect of Duty [ ] - Harassment [ ] - Assault [X] - Misconduct [ ] - Other _____ (Place an x in the box that applies. If other, replace line and specify.) Overview of the Incident: The Director came to the Workshop and ordered us to awaken a positronic and put it in a shell. The Director wanted to, in their words, experiment with the wiping device of Operations. Jonathan Moorland and I express our disapproval. The recent events on Burzsia inspire a lot of conspiracies and fears. Both Jonathan Moorland and I initially expressed refusal. We verified with the Captain. The Captain ordered us to do this. Security informed us there is nothing illegal about the order, considering there is no immediate safety hazard to the crew. But an IPC is made and used as an experiment to continuously be wiped, knowing there is potential damage to it. The Director ended up irreparably damaging the positronic brain. ordering us to scrap it. The costs were estimated to around 50.000 credits, by the Head of Security. This entire situation is completely wrong. We are forced to awaken a positronic brain so that a researcher can play Spirits with it. A legal counselor advised me it would fall under i213. Yet the Captain and Director completely ignored this. Submitted Evidence: The IPC created, designation GPPU-06 The damaged brain The analyzer readings of the brain Would you like to be personally interviewed? [X] - Yes [ ] - No Did you report it to a Head of Staff or a superior? If so, who? If not, why? Armand Gessler, Operations Manager; Lysandre Depardieu-Bodin, Head of Security. Actions taken: We were forced to do this. But we reported it to Security and the Manager. Additional Notes: Jonathan Moorland and I are both willing to testify. The Manager is willing, too. The Head of Security, I am not sure of. Edited March 5 by CatsinHD Changed the credit cost according to lore information.
CatsinHD Posted March 5 Posted March 5 Quote TO: Uskiro Kisisril, Machinist, SCCV Horizon FROM: Maria Leoz, HRA, SCCV Horizon SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: After review of this Incident Report, SCC HR has chosen to not pursue this report. The SCC and her affiliate corporations lead the scientific community with pride. To keep on the forefront of technology, risks must be made to discover and document new data. As such, so long as research projects take place within appropriate research facilities, of which the robotics workshop is included, and appropriate forms are filed where needed, the Command team is well within their authority to make use of any materials at their disposal they deem necessary. While we prefer efficient use of funds, science is costly, as such the cost is accounted for and accepted. With this understood, there is no issue displayed within this report. This report will now be considered closed. -------------------- DTG: 04-20:29-TAU CETI STANDARD-03-2467 SIGN: M. Leoz
Recommended Posts