Reyjakai Posted September 30, 2020 Share Posted September 30, 2020 (edited) Appealing Personnel: Katelynn Mcmullen Specific Incident: I can't recall. It was a very long time ago. Action taken as a result: I got permanently banned from being RD. Action contested: Being permanently banned from RD. Reasoning for contest: It's been such a long time that I can't even remember what happened, or why. Additional notes: I imagine it's connected to me being banned from research in general, also ages ago, but I really couldn't tell you. (If there are none simply leave it blank) Edited October 1, 2020 by Bear Link to comment
Bear Posted October 1, 2020 Share Posted October 1, 2020 To: Katelynn Mcmullen From: CCIA Division of Appeals Subject: Appeal 62/09/30 _______________________________ BODY: After review through the old records and factoring employee behavior over the last five years, we have decided to lift the suspension temporarily. The incident review that lead to this however was incredibly problematic. Understand, your actions will be monitored closely. When interacting with AI's, we expect you take very careful actions and understand the enormous cost of such assets before making ration decisions. You are being reinstated as Research Director, however, there will be a one month probation. The following actions will occur: You are reinstated to Research Director as of now. You will remain under employee review for the next month. Should the month go without hinderance then the lift will be permanent. _______________________________ DTG: 30-03:54-TAU CETI STANDARD-09-2462 Sign: Saul Walker Link to comment
Recommended Posts