Biabri

Your actions by themselves make enough a fool of you. This was just some mindless fun after I'd happened upon the site again. Bah Bai, sheeple.

Japed. Delet this.

There's no proof of any of this and once again you are reinforcing the lies of others Scheveningen. If this is the community I can expect then I don't want to be a part of it, I could care less. You've handled yet another complaint despite my wishes against, despite me providing actual evidence that you are not able to look at a situation and remain unbiased. I've reviewed other complaints against you and can do nothing but nod my head in sympathy and understanding. I think you're sucking up to Clearthoughts, really hard and it's quite obvious. Disgustingly so. You take his word for gospel and excuse his wrongdoings in the same breath as you shout accusations of a similar nature at me. The response from senior staff wasn't particularly helpful, I seriously doubt that anyone but you had any part in this decision. You'll be waiting for longer than a month before I grace you with my presence again, if I think you deserve it even then. You're a hypocrite. You're a liar. You're lazy. I can't help but smile even now, reading over your words and wondering why I ever thought you'd be someone that maybe I'd enjoy talking with. Of course not. There is proof that Clearthoughts has lied in the first player report he made. I pointed it out to you and you completely ignored it. Once again, you've banned me for reasons unrelated to the complaint, the ban reason is misleading. You're just throwing a hissy fit and using the non-existent power you have to deny me access to something I don't particularly want to be a part of anymore. You're nothing but petty and pettifog and you fail at even that. Enjoy yourself, Schev. I hope you get good scores in whatever elementary school you're attending, though I doubt you will. Steer clear of places and topics in which you don't have authority. Fuck you, Clearthoughts. Fuck you. You're a little bitch and honestly, any respect you demanded has been lost threefold in my eyes. I imagine you'll be making a moderator application soon. I know this was a warm-up of kinds for you. There was no reason for you to pursue me so zealously and Schev's attitude would suggest that you've told him this. I imagine that Scheveningen will be one of the main people vouching for you. I imagine he'll bring up your 'ambassadorial approach' and your detailed 'evidence' when doing so. I could care less, to be honest. Goodbye, kidderinos, and don't gulp so loudly, it's distracting.

The story is incorrect, mainly because your orders were followed. This isn't up for discussion, that's the truth, that part of the story is set in stone, but that's not really the issue. Disregarding the fact that Clearthougts filled this complaint with a load of fluff, he is accusing me of metagrudging really. Prove that.

You've treated me like shit. You've ignored me completely. You've refused to see my side of things. You have invested absolutely no effort in me at all! I made a whole new character because you didn't like the last one. I did not take a crap tone with you. You started asking me about stuff I hadn't done at all! You brought up me hacking the airlock (something which didn't happen, to clarify) and then said out of context 'doctors shouldn't be hacking airlocks' and then later you said you were referring to the rules and said "You obviously haven't read them." Of course I was annoyed. What do you expect? Someone posted a report full of lies and then you came and started asking me about things that weren't even in the report! One more time, who told you to not listen to what I said? Why did they say it? And why did you listen? I do not believe that you're the right person to handle this complaint, I've made my position known.

Schev, if you are threatening to go and do as you wish, then go ahead, because I don't have the time to waste talking to a brick wall either. Are you actually assigned to these or do you just grab them up before anyone else can? Why DO you defend Clearthoughts so vehemently without considering the only one here that shouldn't need to prove themselves to you? I haven't lied in any of these player complaints. I don't need to lie. There literally is no evidence. There are your incorrect accounts and the captain's testimony, which is funny considering there's no way he saw me running around with an e-rifle out, namely because he wasn't there and mostly because it didn't happen at all post-library, in which I literally walked from spying out carp to downstairs, responding to a call to come to the library. All in all, you're being untruthful, as untruthful and false as the rest of this is. If you refuse to see that, Schev, then I honestly don't see the point in dealing with you at all. If you take this to be hard evidence then go ahead. I'm under zero obligations to waste my time doing your job, am I? I'm not dealing with this every few days. I don't have to. I will move on and be happier for it. Bear in mind, the captain is allowed to 'break' regulations in emergencies and/or as long as he has a valid reason. That doesn't mean he can do whatever he wants without consequence, he'd get the same punishment as a warden for setting false warrants, by the very words I'm reading here. For you to include the clause on the statement is interesting, I thought you'd cover it up, leaves less work for me. There are no logs that show me putting down weapons or putting them in my back slot, as far as I'm aware, if there were, this would be far easier on me. There is not 'plenty of evidence and record of my behaviour' and you should know that I wasn't banned because of that complaint, I was banned because I told everyone in discord that Schev was calling me out on things I hadn't even done. Mostly because there was nothing else to get me on. Instead of dealing with the complaint full of lies and the player that broke every single rule that he pointed out and claimed I had, he instead found more reasons to pursue the complaint and in the end I was banned for one statement OOCly and the defence of myself on the thread itself. He called me a dick but I wasn't the one filing false complaints and doing so with a smile. My points are valid and they stick, disregard them as you will but at this point I no longer care. I've said my piece and I've made it clear that I do not want Schev to be dealing with this complaint, as they failed to do so impartially and fairly the last time, furthermore, I want some real evidence before you consider this complaint, and the second that someone starts drawing false conclusions and questioning me on lies, again, I want this dropped or I'll know that you really do not want me here. If you cannot investigate a situation properly, then why have you chosen to do so, unless your intent is to muddy the facts and bury the truth...? I'll raise once more the fact that Schev was told by 'someone' and acted upon the advice: "Do not trust anything Biabri says." If you need any more proof that Schev is not unbiased... Yes, I enjoyed formatting this, any more questions?

Lies and misinformation, shocker, right? I've learnt though, since you don't actually have a single thing on me, I just need to not talk about this in discord and this'll all come to nothing. The chat we had wore at my nerves gradually and I found myself less and less inclined to keep up with the polite facade, as you likely did. Your attitude is absolutely appalling, and the way you speak and the airs you put on makes it clear you have some ulterior motive and actually probably care very little about the report itself. Especially considering that none of this was about you. Not at all. You're absolutely toxic, and this reply is the very last courtesy I will extend towards you. You've done this before in rounds that Sabbia has been in and it was just as lame a gimmick as then. Security have hated you just as much each time. Every round you do this people complain. Injunctions are a viable method of dealing with those who abuse the comms they have or mis-use the newscasters. They are there to stop slanderous comments and inflammatory articles. Such as yours. The captain promoting you was a weird move, and I was actually going to include that in my IR against HIM, which I didn't make because I value my time and don't consider myself spiteful enough to do so. He decided that because you'd been generally annoying and really should have gotten some kind of punishment, he'd instead give you sec comms and sec access and let you get away. He then called in me and told me something along the lines of "Bla bla bla, Ward's my pet now, don't talk about him." Later on in the round, he himself, the captain, put out a warrant for "failing to follow orders" for this one exchange... [security] Joseph Ward says, "Dude this Green guy is more racist than I am. It's hilarious." [security] Joseph Ward says, "I mean, okay, it's not hilarious but it's funny because he's nuts." [security] Sabbia Fiore says, "This is how we all see you, Ward." Actually reading the gyazo for this, I'm laughing my ass off. There's no proof, this is a discord chat, not a snap of evidence. "I don't want to make a player complaint." Oh please, CT. You were chomping at the bit to do this, pretending otherwise is just silly, and everyone knows so. Code blue with weapons out, shocker. And no, Mr Captain, you didn't see me running about with my laser out even if it had been something that wasn't acceptable. I put it on my back after the HoS said, which is the exact opposite of what the warrant you as a captain made. You're lying again CT, do you do it by accident or... What? I didn't ignore the order, I questioned it and said that I would have to carry my bag, before swapping the rifle for the bag. When ordered to return the rifle? https://gyazo.com/16a5ae872294373037c02e9aabd5ec4a Yes, there were still carp. Yes, I was shooting them. I returned the rifle, I didn't say anything upon dropping it off, just did so in front of the HoS, who took it into the armoury. Your discord chats show nothing. They show you as disingenuous and they show that you clearly aren't someone that can be remotely trusted. The only one with an OOC grudge here is you, Honey. Fiore thinks Ward is a dick. I'm sure a lot of people think Ward is a dick. Fiore isn't ATLAS. She has no idea why you're insulting crew and abusing comms. She's security, it's her job to stop hooliganism and conflict stirred up by idiots. It's not her job to deal with regulation breaking captains and that HoS. When the HoS attempted to arrest her with a warrant that should never have been created, she decided that him placing handcuffs on her was battery on his part. She was going to arrest him for this crime and then her next steps would be working out what to do with the captain. The captain did not see me running around with the e-rifle. The captain slapped me with a not following orders for responding to Ward, ignoring his own response. Heck, ignore everything I've written if you want to, but actually look into this. Reading the captain's input to this, I can't help but laugh yet harder. Shitcurity? Please. Self awareness? This was not an ambassadorial approach. This approach was to make himself seem calm and collected when he eventually posted the chat, which he did not inform me would be posted at all! I knew, I just didn't particularly care for acting fake and friendly to the person who has now filed two player complaints against me, barely able to hold his malice in. I'm not fake and I try to be as honest as possible. I shouldn't expect the same from others. Goodnight.

Hrm? No, I said I'd witnessed two rounds of your Unathi interacting with Ashley in a negative way. I play a lot of sec now...

Two rounds... I've also not seen Ashley do this at all. Calling her my friend... We've been antags together and it was fun. I don't recall Jaeger doing any transformation stings. She sent me her DNA and told me to spread it, but now we're blurring rounds together. At the start of the round, me and Jaeger agreed that we were going to get rid of the rest of sec. We did so and your Unathi was the only one remaining to our knowledge, we didn't count the cadet as a threat or they joined later. Sorry, Munks? Was that an "I asked her to stop" or was it not? Your statements are misinformed, straight up. Re-read what you've written and read my clarifications. I'm not 'defending my friend' I am telling you that the majority of your complaint is factually incorrect.

And yet a lot of the information on the complaint is factually incorrect or misinformed. This can be cut down to "This person's character causes conflict with my chracter because of it's race." Did you actually tell her to stop OOCly? The round in which this occured not counting? You can't pretend that her justification is entirely wrong. There aren't a massive amount of Unathi to pick from. Aren't you one of the people that believe you should be able to escalate with Guwans far faster though...? You chose to be Unathi.

A character complaint in an antag round though, a round in which you behave so drastically different and your 'employability' shouldn't be called into question? For those two rounds, Ashley Jaeger was not Ashley Jaeger.

Clarifying some things here: There are worse character gimmicks that go unchecked for a start. ATLAS exist, and they have as much employability as someone who keeps their Unathi hateboner to themselves for the most part... I've not actually seen this 'Unathi killed my mother stuff' myself, and I was with her for the rounds you mentioned... I was a changeling aloneside Ashley, being her companion officer. The Varuca was turned into an Ashley. We didn't spend the whole time wandering about ignoring other antag stuff, we 'broke' into the vault and ended up absorbing some people. Now, we did not gather lethals. We had an ion rifle given to us and I gave her a gun. You were the one that had lasers. We were shooting you with rubber bullets, not amazingly effective against your hardsuit. I transform stung you, as I did with a lot of other people, not Ashley. I didn't arrest you either, Ben did all that. I was a ling anyway, so even if I had, it would have been to back up a sister. Sleepy was the Vaurca in question, and saw the events of the first round... I'm not particularly sure why they advised a report as they would know exactly what happened. This seems to merit an IR more than a character complaint, in my eyes, though obviously using rounds that aren't her antag rounds would be better...

Oh my god. Amy.

I'm dropping this complaint, I understand perfectly now that it isn't going to go anywhere. I'm not going to defend my actions any more and I'm not going to make any accusations, expect 0 ahelps from me, ever. I'm still confused about why you brought up powergaming and the airlock at all. I'm going to just move on from this and improve in the future.

I don't particularly see why someone should be charged for not doing something they aren't qualified to do... That doesn't really make any sense, at all. Malpractice would be attempting to do it and failing, in my eyes.

No, really, I was questioned about 5 fucking things that didn't happen. Schev is more than capable of checking this out, do not say otherwise because you'll prove yourself as nothing but a bigger liar. No, they made reports, they couldn't provide proof because nothing had actually happened. I have multiple ahelps where I've had to tell staff they'd been lied to rather than them actually checking the situation out. Do not dispute this because this has actually happened unlike your false complaints and can be checked easily. [*]Hacking the airlock (No...? But try again! I'm not sure why Schev questioned me on that because it didn't even come up in the report.) [*]Attacking security (Didn't happen) [*]Trying to murder you (I hit you once.) [*]"people making comments about their character as grounds for murder and bodily harm." (I hit you once that round and you opened up with three sprays of bullets.) [*]Amy was going full ham with her stolen energy shield and ion rifle, shooting at marines (What? You arrived after they did.) [*]neglected her duty as a nurse (?) [*]validhunting the antags (???) [*]going straight for guns and weapons (False as anything else you've said.) There's also this to be noted... [*] having taken an assault rifle from a fallen marine onto his back, he equipped and shot Amy full of holes until she fell to the ground dead. [*]Ward pulls a baton [*]Wearing ablative armour [*]Is an assistant [*]Screams over comms obnoxiously, hate speech, hasn't broken the law at all, should expect no repercussion. Makes inflammatory remarks at the wrong time and gets smacked, opens fire using his little powergaming armoury of weapons. And I'm the one lacking self awareness... This was the prior statement: to Scheveningen: You have the logs for this round, you can see what has happened, why are you taking this stuff at face value? To which he responds: "Well the person who made this report told me that I should ignore you when you call out these lies." Because that's how you handle these things, of course... You know what? Logs were not secured at all. Schev approached me with an abundance of outright false reports, stuff that didn't happen at all, and even drew false conclusions from the logs that they did bring up! You know nothing about literally any of the IC situations and make a boatload more incorrect assumptions with every sentence you type. Don't comment on it if you have no idea about it. You're still lying. Security wanted to talk to you for hooliganism and Amy decided to attempt to sedate him. Due to your powergaming, wearing the ablative armour, this attempt didn't even work. Amy did not attempt to murder you, she failed to sedate you once and hit you with a crowbar. Stop. Why should I have proof? There's the admin literrally checking the logs of what has happened and they ignore entirely the time stamps and every other piece of proof. Why do you keep saying "We" and acting like you have literally any authority AT ALL. You have none. I can't even bring myself to respect your opinion. You are not honest. You are a liar and nothing more than that in my eyes. Constructive Criticism Once again, why do I have to provide logs, not the accuser here. This was your job, not mine, I don't have to defend myself, you have to prove I've done wrong. Honestly, reading the rest of your stuff, it's the same nonesense. I'm no longer going to give full responses, it's a waste of time. You're not a member of staff, quit it with the "We." It's cringeworthy, honestly. You're wrong, basically, and I don't have to prove a single thing to you. You had no reason to comment here and should not have done so. Don't expect a single minute more of my time. I have wasted enough on you. Regardless of what Schev believes, the rules do apply and we would appreciate you following them. The General Forum Rules Only post if involved. If you are not a moderator or administrator and were not involved in the incident(s) referred to, you may not post or reply to a staff complaint regarding said incident(s). It is permissible, however, to provide testimony regarding a staff member's behavior backed by proof, in the form of screenshots or logs. Stay on topic, this means that the posts should be constructive and focus on the complaint itself only. Any off-topic post made will be removed and met with a reminder to remain on topic. No flame wars. No trolling. Self-explanatory.

Needles should involve searching for veins.

The patient was fine. We did not pop the organ out. We in no way influenced the organ not being in that body. We don't have a farm of people who's organs are mysteriously popping out. What is this emphasis on /happening/ even? It did happen. We don't know why. The methods of getting biomass were limited at the time, we did try other methods and the methods got more and more extreme as we went on. The AI and borg were, for some reason, against helping us secure biomass, while the chemist spent 20 minutes making barely enough biomass to clone one person before heading to cryo. We only discovered that we could use the cryo mix to make more biomass after all this had happened. Regardless, this is unrelated to the ban and is unrelated to the complaint.

Yeah... show me where that says I removed the kidneys? If you look in the logs, as is expected in your position, you would know that she brought her kidneys in and asked why they were no longer inside of her.

I didn't remove the organs, the organs were not removed by medical staff to my IC or OOC knowledge. I have no idea why the organs were where they were, on the outside of her body. The organ removal was a number of false reports that you fell for. Amy generally doesn't disregard orders unless they are completely wrong. If you're talking about Schev's CMO telling her to get changed, she was waiting for cargo to get something when she was arrested for not being in medbay and not doing her duty. This from the CMO who spent more time securing the captain's ID to demote a RAMPANT NURSE ON THE RUN AND DANGEROUS ON A GREEN LEVEL ALERT than working... She demoted, for negligence, the nurse who saved someone's life twice in a shift in a really boring and slow medical shift.... The IR for this is still going through, we'll see what happens. It looks like some things that factored into your decisions as staff are not correct...

Read the complaint, please... And the ban reason.

I don't accept the ban reason as valid, mind you, but I do need some time away to consider Amy and how she will continue. I wasn't the one filing false player reports, spreading lies and encouraging toxicity, darling schev. Reason: Forcible break administered. You have a very very bad player attitude and this has shown in discord in particular where you've been gossiping about this subject and generally not showing you have good will in relation to those who play on the same server as you do. In short, you've been a dick, you need time to cool off and think introspectively about what you've done so far this week, I meant to administer this earlier but you caught me in a long argument over ethical standards you should follow as a player that you don't seem to get..

BYOND Key: Biabri Staff BYOND Key: Scheveningen Game ID: BPO-cqwX Reason for complaint: Scheveningen questioned me on a multitude of issues. The funny thing is, none of them actually happened. When I pointed this out, a point about burden of proof was made, because the burden of proof is on the accused, right, not the admin with the round logs or the accuser, no, not at all. This was quickly dismissed, I doubt the person will get even a wrist slapping for lying in a report. The conversation seemed unprofessional. I'm not really sure what else to say. This just seemed absolutely absurd and like time wasted. If you go into a moderator situation with knowledge that you're going to ignore the other person entirely then why even pretend? I was fine with you up until this point, you've spoken to me before and I accepted your criticisms. So confused. Evidence/logs/etc: [Moderator PM] Scheveningen: Okay, I was already warned about you that you would approach these issues like this. You do not listen. You do not care. ... If you cannot grasp this concept, then it is not we who have failed in our job to educate you, it is you who have failed to grasp and understand the atmosphere we are attempting to maintain here. SO the guy that's lying to you told you that I'd deny the mistruths... And... Sorry, why did you believe that? The last bit seemed a bit random too. [Moderator PM] Scheveningen: Alright. I have done my reviews of the rounds being brought into direct context. At this time, it's come to light that due to your very laissez-faire and devil-may-care attitude, I would be wasting time asking for your opinion on the whole thing here, because you are under the impression you have done nothing wrong. You brought up a load of false reports in which I had actually done nothing wrong. You had no intention of listening to me at all, I should have realised this early on and just not bothered, letting you dole out whatever punishment you'd already decided to throw out. What was the point in our conversation? I brought many facts to light and you ignored them. [Moderator PM] Scheveningen: If I may present as examples, look directly at the IC reports levied against Amy, and then at the complaints levied OOCly at the same character. You should give a shit, because if you do not care to get your conduct squared away, we will resolve to take the easy way and ban you from the server if you are so careless and reticent in making these extreme decisions. Talking about those false complaints and IC issues that legitimately were not Amy's fault. It's not my place to talk about the IC issues here but... Really? Please. [Moderator PM] Scheveningen: ... exhuming internal organs from people to clone people. Okay then, that didn't happen. [Moderator PM] Scheveningen: ... The very next crossfire round you charged at security with an ion rifle and an energy shield and blasted them with it because "they were xenophobic." Uh... No. I didn't charge security, I calmly picked up an E-Shield and an ion rifle and shot a round in the direction of the person who'd been screaming hate speech over comms the whole round, hoping to break his ablative armour and comms. Don't you have logs of this stuff to be checking rather than listening to a salty, toxic liar...? [Moderator PM] Scheveningen: Restrict yourself to your character's knowledge. You, as a player, might have the knowledge of how to hack airlocks, but your average doctor likely doesn't. Reference the glossary for definitions of powergaming and metagaming. This rule is further explained in the character creation section, as well. Well okay then, when did I hack an airlock? Sounds like you've been lied to again and not checked a single log! I get pissed off and say, not too rudely, that these are complete lies. There is a delay before the next message, which is assuming Amy is powergaming and hacking airlocks. What. to Scheveningen: Wait, you're going to disregard my valid statements? to Scheveningen: Because someone who is lying told you to not listen to me? [Moderator PM] Scheveningen: Prove they are lying. I am right here, listening. [Moderator PM] Scheveningen: Burden of proof shifts to you to prove they are lying. [Moderator PM] Scheveningen: You're accusing them of lying. What. to Scheveningen: I walked into a door and lost my hand due to an AI shocking it. [Moderator PM] Scheveningen: That does not have to do with the damn hacking thing. to Scheveningen: Are you going to adress that or are you going to handwaive it? [Moderator PM] Scheveningen: Why would people report them if they didn't happen? to Scheveningen: Because they're salty and want to get at me. [Moderator PM] Scheveningen: lol lol to Scheveningen: You're defending him. to Scheveningen: He lied. [Moderator PM] Scheveningen: Lying requires proof of intent to deceive. ... Generally the idea is that you don't understand that you've been lied to... Uh... I mean, the fact you didn't shut that report down right away shows you got completely and utterly japed. to Scheveningen: He shot me with a spray weapon and critted me. [Moderator PM] Scheveningen: after you attacked him repeatedly. Nooope. I tried to stab him with a syringe but the assistant's traditional ablative armour set meant it didn't work. I hit him one time that round, excluding the ion to disable his armour and comms which did no damage. to Scheveningen: He wasn't a patient, mind you. That's another lie. [Moderator PM] Scheveningen: ...but you still stabbed him with a soporific syringe. I FAILED TO STAB [Moderator PM] Scheveningen: Okay than that pretty much means whatever he did to you was in self-defense because you would've rendered him unconscious whether he did anything or not, so he took the opportunity to at least cripple you in some manner so you couldn't do whatever you wanted after. to Scheveningen: The soporific needle was early in the round. The crowbar was far later. to Scheveningen: Did you check the timestamps? [Moderator PM] Scheveningen: It wasn't early in the round, you literally assaulted him trying to sedate him. I'll take that as a no, then. [Moderator PM] Scheveningen: yet logs show he was giving medical attention to crewmembers too. that's weird. puts it into odd contextual perspective. to Scheveningen: That is weird. to Scheveningen: He's an assistant. HOW STRANGE, DOUBLE STANDARDS? [Moderator PM] Scheveningen: Why should he be held by the same standard if you think it was fair to assault him with soporific? Why should he be subject to the rules because someone stabbed him with soporific, guys? to Scheveningen: Really, I think that maybe just stopping with the hypocrisy and lies would be great. to Scheveningen: 2 attacks, one failed, do not justify 3 sprays of lethal ammo. You have been banned by scheveningen. When you can't think of a response, go for the ban Additional remarks: This situation is obscene and shouldn't have happened in the first place. Instead of coming to me and just telling me about Amy's long list of faults. Players decided to make ahelps behind my back, make reports full of lies and spread those lies. I've had to tell multiple staff that things I've been ahelped about are just straight up untrue. Why? That's not for me to do. You should be checking this stuff out. The ban is fine, I will take the time to think about how Amy can be improved and taking advice from people who actually care, rather than ignorant salty and toxic bullies.

"Any further questions may be asked by those involved in this round, then I will close this in 24 hours." "Other posters have a temporary period where you may dispute this statement in your own words without breaking the other rules or posting in bad faith." Try again?

An assistant who opened three rounds of bullets on me for this and being hit with a crowbar once about an hour later. He said I was trying to murder him. The syringe didn't even go in, he had ablative armour on for some reason. This assistant who'd been shouting hate speech over comms, was wanted by security, had a lethal gun from somewhere and was aligned with the mercenaries attacking the station...