Jump to content

[Accepted] Itanimulli's Unban Application


Recommended Posts

Posted

BYOND Key: itanimulli

Total Ban Length: 1 weekarooni.

Banning staff member's Key: @Aboshehab

Reason of Ban: (You can see this when you attempt to log in to the server) I don't know how to copy and paste it, as the client isn't letting me highlight (Can you even do that?), but basically:

EZ7bfil.png

.


Tis a shame to say that the properties of liquid fire are all I had going for me as Coffin's antag gimmick. I've never really had gank issues in the past, until I began utilizing said chemical, and yes, it was because I wished to set people on fire for my own amusement. As for the plundering thing, I was initially in disagreement because 'muh laws' at the time, but now I see how much of a stretch it was to actually think it would be acceptable to be a douche and steal a concept rather than to stick with objects like I was supposed to do. I didn't give the other person a real chance to understand what was about to happen to them, either, and that's my own fault.


Bottom line: I did some mild-to-severe introspection, and finally decided that I was in the wrong. As hard as I've tried to avoid another gank-related ban, it seems the particular character I was playing made it hard to do, what with the cryptic-ism and the like. So dedicated to avoiding another mishap like this I am, that I've decided to outright remove the character from my dossier. All of my other characters have gimmicks based solely on rp, and this was the only one that decided that surprise death injections were the correct way to do things.


Reason for Appeal: After a bout of soulsearching and localizing why some scenarios were not ganks, and why some were, I took note that my general, one-size-fits-all approach to situations wasn't going to work in an HRP setting in the slightest. As awesome as I'd like to claim myself to be at rp, there's a difference between text-based and spess-based.


My actions as a cyborg have been uncalled for, and whereas I've been right in the past about unjust punishments, this one was an example of me being an incorrect lunatic who wants to use liquid fire as often as possible rather than rp a borg correctly following laws.

I plan to revise the gimmick here, and though I had plenty of things to reveal about why coffin this, why coffin that, I don't think they're a character I can trust myself to play and not, once more, set someone on fire for the sake of setting them on fire.


Hell, I was literally testing the same chemical on monkeys, with minor additions like chloral hydrate, to leave someone as helplessly as possible as they burst into flame and eventually died. How's that for a non-avoidable death?


I'd also like to formally apologize to Abo and Matt for having to put up with my ridiculous "I did no wrong" reply. Usually, I'm far more reserved than that, as, hopefully, catnip, can attest. My behavior before and right after the ban were not acceptable, and my modus operandi of being a chilled out, likeable person under any situation kind of fell through in the face of an accusation I then thought to be false.

Posted

Appeal accepted.


If the ban hasn't been removed, contact myself or failing that, another member of staff to make sure it's lifted.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...