MO_oNyMan Posted June 4, 2018 Posted June 4, 2018 Appealing Personnel: Alan Grimm Specific Incident: Handling the code red situation and its aftermath in medbay Action taken as a result: 5 day suspension, retraining Action contested: 5 day suspension, retraining Reasoning for contest: As can be found from witness testimony, actions taken as a result of armed attack on the station were warranted by the lack of security personnel aboard the station and approved by station intelligence and medical personnel. After the main threat was eliminated and four intruders were killed in action by security staff, their posessions and bodies were required to be allocated in the station morgues and evidence storage for possible further investigation. At no point in between initial request to eliminate the armed threat in medbay and the incident in question was the decision to barr security from medbay communicated to any security personnel. Up until the moment the perpetrator (CMO Gonzales) decided to break regulations by illegally holding two security members. Allegations of violence and unprofessionalism are ridiculous and have no ground behind them. Charges requested were warranted as CMO has no authority to detain crew against their will. If he wanted to withhold weapons left over by the killed intruders for personal use and detain officers on bogus charges he should've stated so and held a vote inbetween command staff to take a captain-level decision to circumvent regulations in an emergency situations as stated in station directives and standard operating procol of the station. This was not done and his actions therefore not only breach the regulations security members but also endangered the crew in the case of the four deceased intruders not being the only armed threat on the station which would result in casualties since most of the security department resources would've been tied up in an unlawful detainment attempt. Not only that but he also coerced medbay staff to refuse to cooperate with on-station investigation, effectively sabotaging it (which he admits to in his signed incident report), which goes against the exepctations of the crew to take steps towards resolving the reported issue during the course of the shift. Additional notes: Decision to resort to criminal methods instead of communicating and following standard procedure is unworthy of trust the crew puts in a command staff representative. CMO Gonzales failed to uphold the expectations placed on him by his position, breaking regulations on multiple occasions and hindering efforts of security staff in an emergency situation. I'm not even going to adress allegations of threatening to use taser equipment (multiple witnesses can attest that at no point during the shift was i carrying taser equipment on my person) and implications of "reminding that EMT Scherer is unlikely to win a CQC fight" after she threatened to choke me being considered a "violence of threat" on my part which is laughable in and of itself.
Synnono Posted June 4, 2018 Posted June 4, 2018 TO: Alan Grimm, CSI, NSS AuroraFROM: Keiko Nishikawa, CCIA Appeals Processing, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: Appeal Receipt Confirmation -------------------- BODY: Your appeal for the following incident is currently being reviewed: Case ID: 24600524 FGonzales_Multiple Date Actioned: 6.04.2460 Handling Agents: Alastair LaCroix, Frederick Tyrent, Edward Whitley, Nadezhda Dimitrova If necessary, you will be contacted by the office of the CCIA Bureau Supervisor to discuss the resolution applied to this incident. You remain obligated to comply with previous CCIA decisions while this appeal is being processed. -------------------- DTG: 04-17:50-TAU CETI STANDARD-06-2460 SIGN: K. Nishikawa
Synnono Posted June 5, 2018 Posted June 5, 2018 TO: Alan Grimm, CSI, NSS AuroraFROM: Deiter Mayer, CCIA Appeals Processing, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: 24600524 FGonzales_Multiple Appeal -------------------- BODY: The office of the CCIABS has declined to process this appeal. No actions being appealed are currently eligible for appeal. -------------------- DTG: 04-21:03-TAU CETI STANDARD-06-2460 SIGN: Deiter M. This IC appeal is being closed because it does not satisfy the updated appeal requirements. Please review the subforum rules, and keep in mind that IC appeals are intended for valid and acknowledged long-term actions that place severe restrictions on character behavior. If you would like to dispute the decisions of the staff members involved in an OOC format, you may do so here: https://forums.aurorastation.org/viewforum.php?f=36
Recommended Posts