Jump to content


Wiki Maintainers
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited


About Synnono

  • Rank
    NanoTrasen Board Member
  • Birthday September 4

Personal Information

  • Interests
    Chameleon Kits, Maidbots

Linked Accounts

  • Byond Key

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hmm today I will drive for twelve hours

  2. Synnono

    [Dismissed] Revert Security Dress Code

    Then we can probably cover it in another thread, as the OP is not attempting to address this.
  3. Synnono

    [Dismissed] Revert Security Dress Code

    When we wrote this, I at least had it in my head that detectives are generally not strictly uniformed, and therefore not covered under Uniformed security employees. CSIs I believe do have some sort of uniform jacket or outfit. Since command is the group that enforces this expectation however, the interpretation of both of those instances is best left to them. In regards to the OP: I was neither the original submitter of this idea nor in the (rather strong) majority of people in CCIA channels who recommended we add it to Uniform Policy. Because support for it there was very strong however, we decided to try it out. The main driver of the change was @The lancer who I would like to have post here with a summary of what he hopes the changes will drive. I think I've explained this to Paradox before as well, but just in case there is any confusion, AFAIK this policy has nothing to do with the Cloak PR or dev's denial of it. It was unfortunate timing that both issues arose at the same time, separately.
  4. This is getting a smidgen off-topic. Per the OP: yes, what is enforced by the reg is not the proper definition of the reg. The name of that reg can probably be changed, as it just requires a minor wiki tweak and a minor dev tweak to be reflected in game. Going to move this to "Accepted" for now, though CCIA may discuss further internally prior to implementation if they think the scope of the reg should change at all.
  5. Synnono

    [1 Dismissal] A more in-depth Directive 7

    Sorry for letting this sit for a long time. Right now, I feel like the better option for AI players who feel abused by command players is to report them to the admins who handle Command whitelists. My reasoning for this is that AIs typically cannot participate in the IC reporting process, and I also think that the kind of player who would modify an AI without a good reason is unlikely to be stopped by an IC directive change. There will be some sort of justification or lowpop situation in which case the proposed provisions will either not apply or be somehow circumvented. It's minor, but I also am not a big fan of making a second, unique instance of rules for command voting, or giving the captain more "votes" etc. We have an existing set of guidelines for command authority that could already apply to the AI if necessary. Adding a vote for dismissal.
  6. I had to erase my location to turn this on.

    The forum wishes to obfuscate me even further.

    1. Show previous comments  3 more
    2. ben10083


      Ah snap is arrow using the forums to dox us

    3. Arrow768


      If someone would have told me about the location issue, I could have fixed it.
      So I had to discover it in a random status update.

    4. Synnono


      Good thing you didn't turn them off! ;D

  7. Synnono

    Incident Report- 12-1-2560

    This report is being closed because there does not appear to be enough IC justification to file it. If you feel it is necessary, you may consider filing an OOC Player or Character complaint here: https://forums.aurorastation.org/forum/18-characterplayer-complaints/
  8. Synnono

    Incident Report - 11/11/2460

    TO: Khaled Al-Bastaki, Head of Security, NSS Aurora FROM: Whitney Foster-Liang, CCIA Bureau Supervisor, NT HQ Bldg. Mendell City SUBJECT: 24601110 KAl-Bastaki_SPicard File Closure -------------------- BODY: Syd Picard's employment has been terminated following his confession of terrorist activities against the People's Republic of Adhomai and NanoTrasen, as well as for making credible threats of harm toward Company officials. He has been detained and turned over to Federal authorities for criminal custody. As such, this file has been closed. Prepare to receive additional instructions for your security team via the appropriate channels within 1-2 days. -------------------- DTG: 1-10:37-TAU CETI STANDARD-12-2460 SIGN:
  9. Synnono

    Aboshehab Letter of Resignation

    Thank you for doing all that you do Abo, and enjoy the big break. This place has had a couple of its best years with you!
  10. Synnono

    New Forum System

    Adding my sentiments to the above by Kaed, Butter and Mofo, just in case they happen to matter more here than they have previously in Discord or in the staff subforum. We should be able to edit our own posts. If there are any forums where that would be a bad idea, let's let admins write rules for it and require attention be paid to timestamps and edit reasons, rather than just turning it off.
  11. Synnono

    Incident Report, 11/27/2460

    This report is being closed because there appears to be insufficient IC grounds to file it. If you have outstanding issues with the involved players' OOC handling of a situation, we encourage you to file a character or player complaint here, as appropriate: https://forums.aurorastation.org/forum/18-characterplayer-complaints/
  12. Synnono

    [Closed] Incident Report - 11/16/2460

    The above post was edited for clarity on one of the reported characters' roles, with the permission of the OP.
  13. To clarify this, the player was restricted from playing the character of Marc Price specifically in a security role for one month, as an IC suspension. CampinKiller was never banned from the server, from playing security, or from playing Command as a result of the Incident Report investigation. They could have also joined a round as Price during the term of the suspension in a non-security role. The complaint he made regarding that investigation and our response to it may be reviewed here: https://forums.aurorastation.org/viewtopic.php?p=103565#p103565 The loss of the previous whitelist was a result of OOC actions taken after the closure of that first staff complaint, and further details are covered in the second staff complaint, which Doxx linked to in her post.