Jump to content

Synnono

Regular Members
  • Content Count

    896
  • Joined

  • Last visited

3 Followers

About Synnono

  • Rank
    NanoTrasen Board Member
  • Birthday September 4

Personal Information

  • Interests
    Chameleon Kits, Maidbots

Linked Accounts

  • Byond CKey
    synnono

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Each April, the power of the fickle gods who govern the complaint subforums waxes terrible. Why is it every year that there are so many IRs during this month? Is it the US tax season? Is "IRS" too close to "IRs?"

     

    1. Show previous comments  3 more
    2. ben10083

      ben10083

      9 Irs 😭

    3. Doxxmedearly

      Doxxmedearly

      Makes you want to come out of retirement, hm?

    4. geeves

      geeves

      synn i love you

  2. Hmm, today I will post on Synnono's dashboard to tell them that I miss them.

  3. Hmm today I will drive for twelve hours

  4. Then we can probably cover it in another thread, as the OP is not attempting to address this.
  5. When we wrote this, I at least had it in my head that detectives are generally not strictly uniformed, and therefore not covered under Uniformed security employees. CSIs I believe do have some sort of uniform jacket or outfit. Since command is the group that enforces this expectation however, the interpretation of both of those instances is best left to them. In regards to the OP: I was neither the original submitter of this idea nor in the (rather strong) majority of people in CCIA channels who recommended we add it to Uniform Policy. Because support for it there was very strong however, we decided to try it out. The main driver of the change was @The lancer who I would like to have post here with a summary of what he hopes the changes will drive. I think I've explained this to Paradox before as well, but just in case there is any confusion, AFAIK this policy has nothing to do with the Cloak PR or dev's denial of it. It was unfortunate timing that both issues arose at the same time, separately.
  6. This is getting a smidgen off-topic. Per the OP: yes, what is enforced by the reg is not the proper definition of the reg. The name of that reg can probably be changed, as it just requires a minor wiki tweak and a minor dev tweak to be reflected in game. Going to move this to "Accepted" for now, though CCIA may discuss further internally prior to implementation if they think the scope of the reg should change at all.
  7. Sorry for letting this sit for a long time. Right now, I feel like the better option for AI players who feel abused by command players is to report them to the admins who handle Command whitelists. My reasoning for this is that AIs typically cannot participate in the IC reporting process, and I also think that the kind of player who would modify an AI without a good reason is unlikely to be stopped by an IC directive change. There will be some sort of justification or lowpop situation in which case the proposed provisions will either not apply or be somehow circumvented. It's minor, but I also am not a big fan of making a second, unique instance of rules for command voting, or giving the captain more "votes" etc. We have an existing set of guidelines for command authority that could already apply to the AI if necessary. Adding a vote for dismissal.
  8. I had to erase my location to turn this on.

    The forum wishes to obfuscate me even further.

    1. Show previous comments  3 more
    2. ben10083

      ben10083

      Ah snap is arrow using the forums to dox us

    3. Arrow768

      Arrow768

      If someone would have told me about the location issue, I could have fixed it.
      So I had to discover it in a random status update.

    4. Synnono

      Synnono

      Good thing you didn't turn them off! ;D

  9. This report is being closed because there does not appear to be enough IC justification to file it. If you feel it is necessary, you may consider filing an OOC Player or Character complaint here: https://forums.aurorastation.org/forum/18-characterplayer-complaints/
  10. TO: Khaled Al-Bastaki, Head of Security, NSS Aurora FROM: Whitney Foster-Liang, CCIA Bureau Supervisor, NT HQ Bldg. Mendell City SUBJECT: 24601110 KAl-Bastaki_SPicard File Closure -------------------- BODY: Syd Picard's employment has been terminated following his confession of terrorist activities against the People's Republic of Adhomai and NanoTrasen, as well as for making credible threats of harm toward Company officials. He has been detained and turned over to Federal authorities for criminal custody. As such, this file has been closed. Prepare to receive additional instructions for your security team via the appropriate channels within 1-2 days. -------------------- DTG: 1-10:37-TAU CETI STANDARD-12-2460 SIGN:
  11. Thank you for doing all that you do Abo, and enjoy the big break. This place has had a couple of its best years with you!
  12. Adding my sentiments to the above by Kaed, Butter and Mofo, just in case they happen to matter more here than they have previously in Discord or in the staff subforum. We should be able to edit our own posts. If there are any forums where that would be a bad idea, let's let admins write rules for it and require attention be paid to timestamps and edit reasons, rather than just turning it off.
  13. This report is being closed because there appears to be insufficient IC grounds to file it. If you have outstanding issues with the involved players' OOC handling of a situation, we encourage you to file a character or player complaint here, as appropriate: https://forums.aurorastation.org/forum/18-characterplayer-complaints/
×
×
  • Create New...