[DENIED] Appeal 25/12/2461

[Lady Fowl]

Appealing Personnel: Ynnefer Killinski

Specific Incident: Action #142: 07/26/2460

Action taken as a result: Permanent reprimand: Employee warned for distributing experimental weaponry with DNA locks, while one of them had her own DNA imprinted, resulting in severe injury of the officer who later tried the weapon out. Double check any experimental technology before distribution.

Action contested: I, Ynnefer Killinski was never at fault for Mister Price's negligent actions in mishandling a firearm he was told was not to be moved from the armory. Further more Price attempted to leverage the captain at the time to press charges or he would IR the captain.

Reasoning for contest:   I believe the Head Of Security acted in bad faith all things considered to cover himself in a incident that would of ended his professional career had he not shifted the blame onto others. I am in the process of retiring from the company, however I wish to retire with my permanent reprimand (My first and only action taken on me) removed.

---

Additional notes: (If there are none simply leave it blank)

Edited January 4, 2020 by Bear

[Bear]

To: Ynnefer Killinski
From: CCIA Division of Appeals
Subject: Appeal 25/12/2461 Confirmation

_______________________________

BODY:

Your appeal for the following incident is currently being reviewed:

Case ID: 24600726 MPrice_KEliade_YKillinski
Date Actioned: 26.7.2460
Handling Agent: Saul Walker

 

If necessary, you will be contacted by the office of the CCIA to discuss the resolution applied to this incident.

You remain obligated to comply with previous CCIA decisions while this appeal is being processed.

________________________________

DTG: 02-04:24-TAU CETI STANDARD-01-2462

Sign: CCIAAMS

[Bear]

To: Ynnefer Killinski
From: CCIA Division of Appeals
Subject: Appeal 25/12/2461 Denial

_______________________________

BODY:

After thorough review of the investigation and your employee file, we cannot find sufficient cause for the reprimand to be removed. Distribution of technology from the Research and Development department will always carry inherent risks. However, distribution of devices and weaponry with the intent to detonate if mishandled by improperly trained or misinformed individuals is a carelessness that does not mesh with our goals or the mission within NanoTrasen. That being said, clarification will be provided to the reprimand noting that the injury resulted from a failsafe mechanic rather than poor construction or design.

ACTION: The reprimand will be changed to be worded as follows:
 

Quote

 Reprimand: Permanent reprimand  applied for the distribution of weaponry with an explosive fail safe which resulted in a severe injury. Employee is to ensure experimental technology is designed to be safe and user friendly without such explosive or deadly fail safe mechanics.

________________________________

DTG: 04-02:30-TAU CETI STANDARD-01-2462

Sign: Saul Walker