Faris Posted October 18, 2020 Share Posted October 18, 2020 Reporting Personnel: Khaled Al-BastakiJob Title of Reporting Personnel: Head of SecurityGame ID: A round of Extended has ended! [Game ID: b9G-cQiz]Personnel Involved: - Kaxto Kuhwinla, Security Contractor: Offender - Cordia Caladius, Head of Personnel: Witness - Meria Volvalaad, Captain: Witness Secondary Witnesses: - Time of Incident: Real Time: 2340 GMT+4Location of Incident: Security LobbyNature of Incident: [ ] - Workplace Hazard [ ] - Accident/Injury [ ] - Destruction of Property [ ] - Neglect of Duty [ ] - Harassment [ ] - Assault [ ] - Misconduct [X] - Other "Security Risk" Overview of the Incident: They were spouting anti-company rhetoric in the sense that "Nanotrasen can rot.". They showed no remorse or understanding of the issue despite attempts to talk to them about it. They were eventually suspended and Central was contacted.Submitted Evidence: Suspension form and confirmation fax from Central regarding the incident. Spoiler Recorded testimonies Spoiler Spoiler Spoiler Did you report it to a Head of Staff or a superior? If so, who? If not, why?: The Head of Personnel reported it over Command frequency. Myself, the Head of Security and Captain heard it, took interest in it and investigated with myself taking the lead.Actions taken: Timeline of events 1- The Head of Personnel as shown in their testimony, attempted to speak to them about it, which did not seem to yield much due to the attitude and opinions of the offender. 2- After it was reported to us, I brought the offender to my office and attempted to speak to them about it. They said that they work for Zavodskoi and that Nanotrasen can rot. They added that they do not like Nanotrasen. My intention was to potentially break down the issue and attempt to rebuild them, but they showed no remorse or understanding why it was wrong, so the effort felt futile. They were sent out of the office. 3- Captain and I discussed it. Best course of action was to inform central and suspend the individual. Their risk factor was too high to justify them being part of the security team. 4- Offender was called back into the office and informed of the decision with the reasoning behind it. Warden Carmen Zhao was called to make sure they surrendered their gear and properly went through the suspension process. No noted resistance to this action by the offender. Additional Notes: They were not an individual I can trust to maintain the safety and integrity of the station and its crew. The anti-company sentiment showed them to be a risk to have as part of the team, as they might not be conducting their due diligence which could cost the company expenses and threaten the lives of crew by inaction due to their very public opinions. Link to comment
Brayce Posted October 20, 2020 Share Posted October 20, 2020 TO: Khaled Al-Bastaki, Head of Security, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report has been received and placed in a queue for the CCIA Division to review. If necessary, you will be contacted by a CCIA Agent when an investigation begins. -------------------- DTG: 20-18:36-TAU CETI STANDARD-10-2462 SIGN: CCIAAMS Link to comment
JMJ_99 Posted November 7, 2020 Share Posted November 7, 2020 Quote TO: Khaled-Al Bastaki. Head of Security, NSS Aurora FROM: CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that an investigation has now been opened regarding your incident report, and assigned to Daniel Bradford (Contextual). You may be contacted by the CCIAA for an interview, or you may contact them directly if you have any questions. -------------------- DTG: 06-23:51-TAU CETI STANDARD-11-2462 SIGN: CCIAAMS Link to comment
JMJ_99 Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 Quote TO: Khaled Al-Bastaki, Head of Security, NSS AuroraFROM: CCIAA Daniel Bradford, NTCC OdinSUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: The investigation of this incident has concluded, and appropriate action has been taken for affected individuals. This matter will now be considered resolved. -------------------- DTG: 24-20:59-TAU CETI STANDARD-11-2462SIGN: Daniel B. Link to comment
Recommended Posts