ben10083 Posted July 7, 2022 Posted July 7, 2022 Reporting Personnel: KEEPER Job Title of Reporting Personnel: Tau Ceti Foreign Legion Prefect Game ID: ciN-abq8 Personnel Involved: (Name, Job Title: Offender/Witness/Other. Only three witnesses other than yourself permitted, the rest go to secondary witnesses. Victims count as witnesses) - Kei Nakai, Security Officer (Witness) - Karl Voigt, Executive Officer (Offender) - TENDER, Tau Ceti Foreign Legion Legionnaire (Witness) Secondary Witnesses: (Name, Job Title: Short description of what they witnessed) - Kylie Robinson, Bridge Crew (Communicated with them multiple times, witness to talks between me and Karl Voigt) Time of Incident: N/A Real Time: 09:30 PM EST, 07/06/2022 Location of Incident: Corporate Reconstruction Zone, space Nature of Incident: [ ] - Workplace Hazard [ ] - Accident/Injury [ ] - Destruction of Property [ ] - Neglect of Duty [ ] - Harassment [ ] - Assault [X] - Misconduct [ ] - Other _____ Overview of the Incident: My squad was patrolling the area when we detected an unregistered structure in sensor range. We began to depart and made preparations to board the vessel and investigate for any further illegal activity. As we approached, we detected the SCCV Horizon also on an intercept course. I contacted them and informed them of our intentions and offered cooperation, in which the command staff accepted and said we could join their 'team'. However, when we prepared to depart, we could no longer detect a suitable landing zone for our vessel due to the Intrepid taking the only available spot. We contacted their command about this, but we will simply told about how "They got there first" and how their desires to explore this station supersedes our interest in investigating the illegal station. We then contacted their expedition team, in which we were informed that command failed to even inform them that we also desired to board the station, and after I asked them to not take anything that we can use to determine the origin or makers of the station, we then once again contacted command. Command was much less friendly this time, unacceptably so, as Karl Voight started talking about how the Republic of Biesel is "under the thumb of the SCC" and how he is " the highest ranking staff for the SCC onboard, and can act as a Biesel Consular" due to this (I requested to speak with a consular to discuss this situation earlier.). When I expressed my disagreement with his assessment, he openly said about how he "Does not hide his dislike for the TCFL" and soon after we ended the call. We waited awhile and called them again to ask about what items they acquired from the station, and they were notably much more cooperative, likely due to the offender being unavailable and higher ranked individual being on the line. Overall, while it is totally fine for Karl to have such opinions regarding the TCFL, they do not justify the level of interference he caused my squad that day, and due to this interference, the expedition team he sent completely stripped the station of any relevant items or information, including likely contraband as claimed by Kei Nakai. Submitted Evidence: (Place any in round evidence that you gathered. Forms written in round, recorder logs and photographs can all be considered evidence. Signatures, dates and stamps all account to the authenticity of the form, and it's good to have them whenever possible. Clear screenshots of the whole piece of evidence are required. Evidence that has been produced or affected by antagonist activity should never be submitted. Forging or falsifying evidence is forbidden both ICly and OOCly, and may incur administrative action.) Would you like to be personally interviewed?: [X] - Yes [ ] - No Did you report it to a Head of Staff or a superior? If so, who? If not, why?: The Biesel Consular was not available that day. Actions taken: (Description of efforts made by the reporter, security, Heads to resolve this incident) Unknown, to my knowledge, none. Additional Notes: I understand that it is unusual for me to file a complaint, but we felt it was the best way to deal with this problem instead of possible escalation to military command, as this report is mostly due to the conduct of one officer. I can possibly arrange for an interview if we can organize a time and place.
Sycmos Posted July 7, 2022 Posted July 7, 2022 (edited) IR closed pending administrative action. Edited July 7, 2022 by Sycmos
Recommended Posts