Jump to content

ben10083

Members
  • Posts

    755
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ben10083

  1. having a warrant. Two officers from completely different departments should not be having a social visit in a work office in another department. They should be having a social visit somewhere else in a place where relaxing is appropriate. 1. Warrants are used to show there is a justifiable reason, the reason cant be the warrant itself. 2. ok then, lets remove the following areas to make sure crew members stay in the common Social gathering area provided to them generiously by NanoTrasen Corporation Engineering break room conference rooms medical lobby (renamed to "medical transfer intermediary") Sec lobby Red dock (Crew will be assigned to their respective transfer cube to standby for shuttle to prevent violations of the social order by socializing in the incorrect zones.) The examples are obviously satire, but they highlight how it doesnt matter where they socialize. If they want to visit their friend who is working in Engineering department, so be it. If they have a problem they can ignore them.
  2. in regards to trying to limit dept sec officer access, no one wants to be simply standing in a hallway begging for a antag to walk in. it is also a can of worms in deciding what is allowed and not allowed to be accessed.
  3. Actually for awhile it used to be 7 seconds flat, which was a problem since anytime they flashed the borg again it reset the timer. It was then changed through this pr: https://github.com/Aurorastation/Aurora.3/pull/4954 to be randomized from 3,7. Now it follows this formula ( flick("e_flash", M.flash) ) from this pr: https://github.com/Aurorastation/Aurora.3/pull/8191.
  4. TBH I feel that the malf nuke wouldnt be a problem if malf didnt have to go delta to get combat modules.
  5. Despite the fact there are mercenaries in the region of space that are known to attack stations before? Despite the fact that NT has shown no indication of being abusive with their military power? Despite the fact that NT likely has lobbyists throughout their government and the prospects for passing such legislation is slim at best?
  6. I am unsure about this, since if you have a residential space, you have people who live in it. How do you enforce room privacy and who owns what room?
  7. Yet not impossible, it is up to the people to give them personality, admins will be hard pressed to have server-enforced personality (considering how subjective it is) -1 as Skull's counter suggestion is much better. If the main problem is op equipment, rebalance it. Also what would be the lore reason that NT decides that Aurora, their 2nd best station mind you, should not have at least minor ert oversight? ERT too important to defend Aurora if called and The Odin?
  8. TO: Himari Kitaru, Captain, NSS Aurora FROM: CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: The investigation of this incident has concluded, and appropriate action has been taken for affected individuals. This matter will now be considered resolved. -------------------- DTG: 26-02:45-TAU CETI STANDARD-01-2462 SIGN: Benedict Smith
  9. Who is Agent 'N/A' and why are they considered such a good agent? I heard they snapped their fingers and invented the Corporate Regulations, but can such a powerful person really exist?
  10.                 

    1. Mofo1995

      Mofo1995

      Clever girl...

  11. +1 It causes more annoyance than whatever benefits are derived from it. It is annoying for me to do a announcement on the Odin and have no clue if it sent or not.
  12. Nanites? The stuff that turns people into a borg? Yes. Of course in a ideal world said borg that was made would be given a lawset to obey the traitor, but that sounds like alot of fucking work. In the very rare instances I do traitor, I like doing a gimic of borgification.
  13. Well with whatever that was, I will get us back on track. The system as it is is fine, if you get your ticket closed to early, just make another, what are the admins going to do, ban you for no raisen?
  14. ironically long ago I wanted to do something like this, but I suck at coding so I didn't know how to lol.
  15. I would like a item mechanically similar to nanites added to uplink.
  16. Roundstart is the most vulnerable part of every antag's game, they need some sort of control, or they will be hampered for a large part of the round.
  17. I do not like this suggestion, and here is why: In Aurora, there is enough tedious stonewalling that antags have to face, they are tasked to create a story that entertains, yet also are faced with the obstacles that are the majority of the crew. For example, in rev, you have: Command questioning every attempt at deception you try, making using fake announcements and forgery very difficult (Seriously, there is a 9/10 chance they immediately send us a fax indirectly asking us to shut down the gimic) Security Other crew who are "Not exactly loyalist but will fight the revolutionaries when given the chance" Overall, I feel having the borers as they are is a step in the right direction for the server. Regardless, give it a month at least, then we can look back and see if having involuntary round start hosts was good in the end or not.
  18. Wouldn't this make another obstacle for IPC Miners? Tesla can emp synthetics.
  19. The 40k Universe has some.. inspirations... for any melee weapons.
  20. @Aphelion Thanks for the info, out of curiosity, has there been any addition to exosuit equipment? Has there been any changes to mech weapons?
  21. I don't like the idea of a security officer, who knows basic engineering (hacking), or RnD. Security guards can guard a area without knowing how to operate said area.
  22. I really dislike the back entrance, this is just begging security/engineering/mining to just always take the back, as you only face one turret and can screw them over by taking out like,1-2 cameras? Rest I am fine with.
  23. The reason people do secret is that there are people who only see it as their objective to "win" against the ai. If malf was vote only, you will see the following A) Constant doubting of Central Command Announcements B) Constant verbal suspicion of synthetics C) Constant Suspicion of AI Overall, I think it is fine as it is, perhaps add a time requirement to malf ai?
  24. I will start off my saying that I do not agree with this suggestion, and will counter the points raised to favor it. "Malf Rounds are usually bad" This is extremely subjective. It is simply foolish to expect a 'perfect' game where everyone is happy. You see this all the times with admin events. There will always be people you do not please, and this is true for all antag gamemodes as well. "All games either end in delta ai or dead ai" This argument doesn't really hold water. If you simplify stuff to such an extent you can say this about literally any game-mode. (Example: Revolution "Either Revs or Loyalists win" Merc "Either Mercs win or they die/captured") Not to mention, there has been many maf rounds where a delta isnt used, or is used as a means to unlock abilities rather tham nuke the station "Improve is no longer feasible" It is clear that there is a sizable part of the community that likes Malf, as it is commonly a round that people engage in, rather than some gamemodes that have periods of some people cryoing. People don;t want things removed people they see potential, and they are intrigued by the concept the game-mode presents.
×
×
  • Create New...