Jump to content

ben10083

CCIA
  • Content Count

    632
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About ben10083

  • Rank
    NanoTrasen Official
  • Birthday 16/01/2002

Linked Accounts

  • Byond CKey
    ben10083

Recent Profile Visitors

620 profile views
  1. TO: Lynn Songna, Anomalist, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report has been received and placed in a queue for the CCIA Division to review. If necessary, you will be contacted by a CCIA Agent when an investigation begins. -------------------- DTG: 11-01:11-TAU CETI STANDARD-07-2461 SIGN: CCIAAMS
  2. TO: Oscar Easter, Security Officer (Contractor), NSS Aurora FROM: Benedict Smith, CCIA, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: An Investigation has been conducted regarding the incident, and appropriate action(s) has been taken. The matter is now considered resolved. -------------------- DTG: 11-12:54-TAU CETI STANDARD-07-2461 SIGN: Benedict Smith
  3. @Naelynn Regarding ERT, does your proposed change have it removed from NT and more of a elite merc team?
  4. I love meme PR titles, they bring a smile to my face, while also (usually) hinting at what the PR is. I feel the cons of enacting this suggestion outweigh the pro of not looking at desc to know what PR is.
  5. Will maint drones still be a thing
  6. Due the to large amount of personnel involved, please reduce the list to major offenders and witnesses. (I hear that you had trouble with that, so I recommend the engineer doing the breaker stuff, The Officer with harassment, some who were major harassers. I recommend Nashwa for victim, and pick some witnesses that you feel know the most about the situation).
  7. I feel it is best not to focus on the fact of it's origin...but the what the item in question is. If the item is not contraband, it's theft, but if the item is actual contraband, they get punished for it. I don't see the problem here.
  8. TO: Oscar Carter Easter, Security Contractor, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report has been received and placed in a queue for the CCIA Division to review. If necessary, you will be contacted by a CCIA Agent when an investigation begins. -------------------- DTG: 03-10:23-TAU CETI STANDARD-07-2461 SIGN: CCIAAMS[/i]
  9. TO: Daniel Carmichael, Security Officer, NSS Aurora FROM: AMS, CCIAAMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report has been received and placed in a queue for the CCIA Division to review. If necessary, you will be contacted by a CCIA Agent when an investigation begins. -------------------- DTG: 03-10:08-TAU CETI STANDARD-07-2461 SIGN: CCIAAMS
  10. TO: Katheryn Linerbord, Security Officer, NSS Aurora FROM: Benedict Smith, CCSA, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: Due to the confidential and multi-corporation nature of Project Peacekeeper, it would be impractical and impossible to full discern who is at fault for this incident. We will lodge a complaint to the appropriate figures to prevent this from happening in the future. -------------------- DTG: 03-09:57-TAU CETI STANDARD-07-2461 SIGN: Benedict Smith OOC: Since the person being reported is not a actual person, this IR is being thrown out.
  11. We must keep in mind that IC punishments are not inherently bad. Yes, the company is technically punishing you, but it doesnt have any lasting ooc impact (most of the time) and is expected to help develop a character. If you make regulations open to things that canon rounds usually cause, other rounds would be chaos, while if we keep them the way they are, it provides a stable framework for rounds to follow, with deviations from command and others causing a slap on the wrist by ccia if they get ired. It is something they should keep in mind, but not a end all be all deterant.
  12. This will be combined with this IR: https://forums.aurorastation.org/topic/12108-incident-report-06052461/
  13. any difference between this one and this one?
  14. I really dislike this for the following reasons: IAA should not be able to lessen/appeal sentences, they are not lawyers Appeals in this game are used to avoid crimes and are overall a waste of time rights already listed in corporate regulations CCIA doesnt have jurisdiction on criminal law, p sure Tau Ceti wont be happy if a company lets a murderer go free because "Oh this guy said so" You already can ask IAA, HoP, Captain, etc. to report mishandling Overall I feel this is unneeded and will over-complicate security. -1
  15. I agree with limitations, there are some jobs that straight up need communication (A mute Captain or FT would be extremely annoying). Honestly I must admit I am biased however, as I dislike any interaction with mute characters as it is annoying to get anything done with them, but thats just me. TLDR: Some jobs should have disability restrictions, namely those where communication or other functions impacted by a disability is paramount.
×
×
  • Create New...