Karhast Posted November 30, 2023 Posted November 30, 2023 Reporting Personnel: Zakaal Vo Job Title of Reporting Personnel: Engineer Game ID: The round prior to cq3-aehw Personnel Involved: Offender: Quy Ha Phan - Investigator Witnesses: Zakaal Vo - Engineer Tajrrhraz Sha'relrr - Engineer Secondary witnesses: Aliya Shi - Warden Time of Incident: (If unable to provide, leave blank) Real Time: (23:00 GMT (ish) 29/11/2023) Location of Incident: Brig, interrogation room Nature of Incident: [ ] - Workplace Hazard [ ] - Accident/Injury [ ] - Destruction of Property [ ] - Neglect of Duty [ ] - Harassment [ ] - Assault [x] - Misconduct [ ] - Other _____ Overview of the Incident: At some point, the deck three substation that feeds the cafe was left disabled on output, causing a power outage once APC units ran dry. How this happened is unclear - Tajrrhraz comments that he is sure he enabled the output while configuring RCON. Once the issue was noticed, engineer Tajrrhraz Sha'relrr checked the IDScan and bolts wires on the kitchen airlock. I voiced over radio that I thought it may be a cut wire causing the problem - I did not see a cut wire at any point, this was only a suspicion. Ultimately, Tajrrhraz Sha'relrr noticed that the substation output was disabled, and resolved the problem by reenabling the output on the substation in person. Along with him, I had physically entered the substation to review it as well. No cut wire was found, both of us corroborated that it was just the output being off that caused any issues. After the technical issues were resolved, investigator Quy Ha Phan asked me to let her review the substation, which I promptly did. She observed traces of my and Tajrrhaz's presence. She later interrogated first Tajrrhaz, and then myself. After my interrogation was done, Quy Ha Phan opted to conclude that I vandalised the substation either by means of disrupting the internals of the SMES unit, or by vandalising subgrid cabling. A sabotage charge was threatened at one point, but ultimately I was only charged with vandalism. At no point was actual damage to the substation or subgrid observed, and both Tajrrhaz and myself concur that none evidently took place. The idea that any vandalism or damage to the subgrid occured came, apparently, from my own prior communication that he suspected the damage was due to a cable being cut. Traces of both engineers entering the chamber were observed, but only I was charged. Nothing beyond circumstancial evidence was found for this charge, and the chain of events leading to it shows a reckless impetuousness from the presiding investigator at the time. I would like to close by stating that being brigged for doing my actual job in good faith is very bad for morale indeed. I want to do well, and that will be tough with the threat of legal action looming overhead because of it. Submitted Evidence: The investigator herself recorded her interrogation with me, blessedly, and I would be glad to hear that again. Would you like to be personally interviewed?: [x ] - Yes [ ] - No Did you report it to a Head of Staff or a superior? If so, who? If not, why?: No. We did not have a CE, the Warden (Aliya Shi) assured me there was no appeal process. When later I was told to write an IR I realised that was a bit wrong, but we were on the cusp of a change in shift anyhow. Actions taken: I spoke to Tajrrhaz and the AI over engineering communications once I was freed. The shift promptly ended, so there was no time to do more, regrettably
CatsinHD Posted November 30, 2023 Posted November 30, 2023 Quote TO: Zakaal Vo, Engineer, SCCV Horizon FROM: Human Resources, AMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that your incident report has been received and placed in a queue for the HR Division to review. If necessary, you will be contacted by a HR Assistant when an investigation begins. -------------------- DTG: 29-21:56-TAU CETI STANDARD-11-2465 SIGN: AMS
TheSleepyCatmom Posted December 5, 2023 Posted December 5, 2023 Quote TO: Zakaal Vo, Engineer, SCCV Horizon FROM: Human Resources, AMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: This is an automated message to inform you that an investigation has now been opened regarding your incident report, and assigned to Khloe Litynzyk (DasFox). You may be contacted by the HR Assistant for an interview, or you may contact them directly if you have any questions. -------------------- DTG: 05-01:57-TAU CETI STANDARD-12-2465 SIGN: AMS
TheSleepyCatmom Posted December 26, 2023 Posted December 26, 2023 Quote TO: Zakaal Vo, Engineer, SCCV Horizon FROM: Human Resources, AMS, NTCC Odin SUBJECT: RE: Incident Report -------------------- BODY: The investigation of this incident has concluded, and appropriate action has been taken for affected individuals. This matter will now be considered resolved. -------------------- DTG: 26-10:27-TAU CETI STANDARD-12-2465 SIGN: AMS
Recommended Posts