Jump to content

Mogelix's Two For One Special


Recommended Posts

Unban Request

BYOND Key: Mogelix

Total Ban Length: Permanent

Banning staff member's Key: Arrow768 

Reason of Ban: Asked to be banned after intentionally jumping through a wormhole, shooting himself and ahelping about it.

Reason for Appeal: This was really dumb of me, a decision I made at night with little foresight and self-destructive guilt and frustration for previous actions. I don't really remember, just that it was dumb and self-destructive, something I don't want to and won't do again.

Ban Request

BYOND Key:  Mogelix

Accused Players Byond Key: Mogelix

Time of Act:10:24-8:24 Estimate AEST, Game ID: b18-bFs8]

Reason for Ban: I admittedly bullshitted my way out of the Ahelp that resulted from this round, where I suicide bombed the shuttle of the mercs that was full of civilians. I had no clear IC motive and did it mostly because I felt 'burnt out' from the round, bored. I majorly disrupted the flow of the game and escalation in a otherwise flawless round and I shouldn't get just a warning for that.

Evidence: The entire scene where I was on the merc shuttle is evidence enough, especially when paired with the RP before that.

Link to comment

Checking the logs again, it seems as the warning didnt save properly, so I reapplied it and verified its saved.

Regarding the unban request:
I´m willing to grant that as, while you did something dumb it did not really effect anyone else and I´d just call it a moment of impaired judgement which can happen.

For the ban request:
If you are sure you want to be banned for the merc situation then that's possible.
But I do not see the reason to do so because:

  • You already received a severe warning about it and the next instance of similar behaviour will lead to a ban anyway.
  • The ban request shows me that you understand what you did wrong and most likely wont do it again.

 

Unless you have any questions or further comments, I´ll just lift the perma and you´ll have to acknowledge the warning.

Link to comment

Sure, I guess. I still think a warnings kind of light. I'd have thought a ban would be more appropriate for that kind of unreasonable shittery. Do keep in mind that only now has the warning entered the web interface, unlike yesterday where I couldn't find it. So, I'll acknowledge the warning.

Link to comment
×
×
  • Create New...