Valwyn Posted November 11, 2020 Posted November 11, 2020 Majority of People i see, if not mostly Security Uses Gloves, Reason is to not taint the Evidence with fingerprints, and those who do not use, Because they prefer Watches it gets complained by Investigations team. Make it so you can use solo or was a accessory for the gloves? The Watches was a Acessory you will still be able to use it by using the ''Check Time'' Verb on the ''object'' Window anyway. I would like to wear my engagement Ring together with my leather gloves, people would see it and open dialogues about it or somenthing. good flavor.
greenjoe Posted November 11, 2020 Posted November 11, 2020 I think I saw that baystation has code to put gloves on over rings, maybe that could be ported
Carver Posted November 11, 2020 Posted November 11, 2020 You can already wear rings with gloves. Have ring worn, have gloves in hand, press the e (equip) button above the hands. You will wear your gloves over rings, using the same code as used for wearing magboots over footwear. This isn't the case for watches because the watch would 'override' the gloves and render them invisible/unusable-while-worn-over, and the same applies vice versa.
Valwyn Posted November 11, 2020 Author Posted November 11, 2020 (edited) Quote You can already wear rings with gloves This is pointless for my Case because it would be the same effect of not wearing a ring at all, just leaving the ring at the bag would have the same effect, the gloves hide it. why: Because it does not show you're using a ring when you Examine someone when the gloves cover the Ring. The idea would would be, to show like : He has some black leather gloves on his hands. Attached to it is the engagement ring. Like the other acessories. Quote This isn't the case for watches because the watch would 'override' the gloves and render them invisible/unusable-while-worn-over, and the same applies vice versa. Well if Watches also get marked was accessory, it would accept and attach to the gloves no? , i did not understand the explanation, i'am dummy. Spoiler 1 hour ago, Carver said: You can already wear rings with gloves. Have ring worn, have gloves in hand, press the e (equip) button above the hands. You will wear your gloves over rings, using the same code as used for wearing magboots over footwear. This isn't the case for watches because the watch would 'override' the gloves and render them invisible/unusable-while-worn-over, and the same applies vice versa. Edited November 11, 2020 by Valwyn
melodramatize Posted November 11, 2020 Posted November 11, 2020 I don’t know about you but I don’t wear rings OVER my gloves anyway so them not showing when you have gloves over them makes perfect sense to me.
Carver Posted November 11, 2020 Posted November 11, 2020 Rings aren't meant to be worn over gloves, yes. As for the watch case, you'd need to have watches enable a right-click verb on the gloves when applied as an accessory. Just visually slapping them on would work, but they'd be non-functional.
Recommended Posts