DaTruRiZZoB Posted December 3, 2020 Share Posted December 3, 2020 (edited) Appealing Personnel: Julian ChetSpecific Incident: INCIDENT REPORT - 9/29/2462Action taken as a result: Demotion, SuspensionAction contested: DemotionReasoning for contest: I feel after an extended time period as an apprentice I've gotten better in team-ethics. So much so I'll have a list of people who can say that I do in the notes section. I feel like for the past 2 months I've learned from my mistakes that caused the demotion in the first place. In response to the concerns of the gravity of the situation, I believe that I understand it fully, and risks like that will not be taken again, as evidenced by my behavior since the incident and lack thereof problems. I hope that the Appeal division can believe in me and the colleagues that vouch for me, that I am a capable engineer and will not cause any further incidents. ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Additional notes: The following Engineers are willing to vouch for me Chief Engineer Tankred St. Engineer Freya Sandstrom St. Engineer Alik Antonov Eng. Apprentice Zesuk Narturzuk St. Engineer Cecile Shurrajager Eng. Apprentice/Assistant Skazurah Kas (Not an engineer but I've worked a lot with her) Research Dir. Xiao Zemin. Eng. Apprentice Aen Nhone St. Engineer Valetzrhonaja Nayrragh'Rakhant Eng. Apprentice Halina Na'Baal St. Engineer Azzam Amari St. Engineer Darvan Omega. Chief Engineer Steven Macnaughton St. Engineer Brayden Parker St. Engineer William Becker St. Engineer Jaxon Williams Chief Engineer Nadine Vehalmara (Noting that she has only had them as a subordinate since her start during the 35th's invasion. They were a capable engineer that could do anything tasked of them from what she has noticed. Aware of their background and circumstances, has not caused an issue, though this was over a week and few days more time period.) Edited December 3, 2020 by DaTruRiZZoB Messed up a few things after prematurely posting Link to comment
Hepatica Posted December 10, 2020 Share Posted December 10, 2020 To: Julian Chet From: CCIA Division of Appeals Subject: Appeal 12/02/2462 _______________________________ BODY: After thorough review of your conduct over the course of your demotion, we believe you have learned an important lesson and have come to understand why you were demoted in the first place. Your appeal will be approved and your demotion lifted. We trust you will understand that future mistakes of a similar nature will be met with far harsher consequences. Those that have vouched for you will be held responsible for your actions as well, should it come to such a thing. Behave, and try not to disappoint them. As of 2462/12/10, 01:58, your appeal is approved and you may begin working as a full time engineer once more. _______________________________ DTG: 10-1:58-TAU CETI STANDARD-12-2462 Sign: Caroline Jameson Link to comment
Recommended Posts