Staff Complaint - Head Administrator Alberyk

[Marlon P.]

19 hours ago, Garnascus said:

Yah id say so. At least in spirit. 

I just dont see how he retaliated against you. The strike he issued you was not a reason for your ban. 

Per the staff complaint against him, Alberyk broke the rules by insulting me.

Per the staff complaint, Alberyk also gave an improper strike that was overturned.

Per your ruling in this thread, he broke the rules by releasing my play time.

These three events happened immediately before he posted a player complaint against me.

What other than if not this series of events would be evidence of retaliation?

Do these events establish his intent?

Edited September 11, 2022 by Marlon P.

[Garnascus]

50 minutes ago, Marlon P. said:

Per the staff complaint against him, Alberyk broke the rules by insulting me.

And it was dealt with.

50 minutes ago, Marlon P. said:

Per the staff complaint, Alberyk also gave an improper strike that was overturned.

And it was handled.

52 minutes ago, Marlon P. said:

Per your ruling in this thread, he broke the rules by releasing my play time.

And it will be handled.

52 minutes ago, Marlon P. said:

These three events happened immediately before he posted a player complaint against me.

Anyone can make a complaint. As i have said i have access to all of the staff channels. Alberyk had nothing to do with the judgement on your player complaint, It was independently investigated. I do not believe he abused the system to retaliate against you. All i think you are showing is that Alberyk had issues with you he wanted to bring up officially (In a complaint) and he broke a couple of rules. This does not change the outcome. 

[Marlon P.]

Alright; that's fair.

I'm satisfied in your responses and have nothing left to add.

Thank you.

[Alberyk]

36 minutes ago, Garnascus said:

And it will be handled.

1 hour ago, Marlon P. said:

This was already brought up in the previous complaint, I kinda feel this is going over the same situation/issue again. Also, can you explain what rule and what exactly was the issue with that? Marlon said that what I said was wrong, which I proved that was not, I did not really say that his opinion was invalid because he did not join a round until that point. If he meant joining the server, anyone could see that he did because I also posted that he did connect to it. I also never used that in any point in any argument I had with them about anything he said on the server, so I am bit unsure about that.

[Marlon P.]

To clarify: I'm happy that Garnascus acknowledged alberyk violated the rules, and i accept there doesn't seem to be deliberate retaliation in Alberyk's complaint -- Alberyk's misconduct was seperate from the complaint and my ban.

Does anything else need to be done? 

[Marlon P.]

Got a notice as a forum DM and saw this was still up 

If i understand, alb is going to get a note or something for breaking the rules using Admin powers but it wasn't in service of retaliation.

Gotta lock this thread

@Garnascus