Jump to content

Garnascus

Primary Administrators
  • Posts

    2,185
  • Joined

  • Last visited

6 Followers

Linked Accounts

  • Byond CKey
    garnascus

Recent Profile Visitors

8,081 profile views

Garnascus's Achievements

Artificial Intelligence

Artificial Intelligence (36/37)

  1. Strong disagree. Its an enormous buff to security and improves an area they are already very strong in.
  2. Honestly, when i examine the entirety of events it does look all above board. I admit that the evidence presented does make Eddy look pretty bad here. It is true that this was his character's first round and it is also true he was the individual who handled, at least in part the character complaint on 50_noob's character. I am not making any judgements on the "wrongness" or "rightness" of any IC interactions as they relate to OOC rules but the premise of the original incident report seemed reasonable to me. It also does not seem to be the case that Eddy was observing the round before hand. It makes sense to me that a captain character upon joining would inquire as to the status of an active expedition and make suggestions or orders regarding it as is in their power to do so. The specific comment that Eddy made about making the character to "bait" 50_noob's character into an IR was allegedly said while in a voice chat. There is no proof that he made this comment so i have to analyze the events as is and determine if they are reasonable. While i am a bit uncomfortable with Eddy's comments here where he states. I do not believe it is acceptable to monitor someone IC with a higher ranking character due to the result of a character complaint. It feels a little weird to have any IC interactions be for the purpose of monitoring someones play as a result of a character complaint.
  3. Readthisnameplz is currently on leave so i will live this ban in their place.
  4. I will require some time to gather a timeline of events here. I will also need to confer with other administrators.
  5. @eddymakaveli What do you say in regard's to 50_noob's allegation you joked privately with a staff member that you would utilize your character to bait sasha into an IR?
  6. Do you have proof of this or was it submitted privately?
  7. I think the main issue is it just seems to be showing up every round. I think things like this should be able to spawn outside of their game modes. It makes our setting more cohesive when we treat antagonists as being a part of the universe.
  8. There have been very heated arguments over this in the past from inside and outside of staff but I personally completely understand why an "event only character" exists. The policy of characters that die during canon events being permanent is one I have strong opinions on. When I was still head admin I started and contributed to more than one discussion over it. I have always believed it was needlessly punishing to our players because no other aspect of the game asks you to risk your character. The majority opinion was generally that canon events have the capability to affect actual lore based on what characters live or die or how the horizon's crew responds to certain events or what "conditions" are fulfilled in pursuit of a "good" or "bad" ending. I believe that to be the steelmanned version of the argument. The strawmanned version is the powers that be on this server do not trust the player base to act appropriately when the stakes are as high as they are in a canon event. I don't think that's the case. I think the actual answer is there is a desire to protect the integrity of events by those that create them. Creating a canon event arc takes A LOT of work. I imagine it wouldn't feel great if from the perspective of an event coordinator their work was ruined by the crew acting a little silly.
  9. Ban is ancient so not gonna ask any questions. Ban lifted.
  10. Garnascus

    Return Rat

    Rats where fun. Bring back rats. Dissenting opinions are wrong.
  11. Appeal lifted in Drwago's honor as they are no longer part of the staff team. You seem to also have a permanent job ban from synthetics which you can appeal at your leisure.
  12. Ban lifted in Rushodan's honor as they are no longer on the staff team.
  13. Good idea. I dont have anything else to say here. Title was funny though.
  14. I believe you would make a fine CCIA member. My impression of you over the years has generally been of someone who emphasizes procedure, regulations and of course the rules as written. These are all great qualities to have as a member of CCIA. I also like you as a person and think you're a valued member of this community. Easy +1.
  15. No ban reason is given and theres nothing in the archives so im just gonna unban you without asking too many questions. Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...