Jump to content


Head Admins / Devs
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Garnascus

  1. Why dont we ask @Mofo1995 and @Caelphon to settle this matter. I have absolutely no idea how a simple question is able to generate such a trainwreck of a thread.
  2. Its really demeaning to rooster and his project to imply it cannot survive unless a single spriter keeps doing work. Ryver was also applying for skrell dev at the time of being accepted onto rooster's project. In his own words he was unsure if he would be accepted. Thus, when he was accepted his workload changed. Rooster claims @RyverStyx did not communicate this upon being accepted so rooster assumed they would be able to finish the project. All ryver is guilty of here is a lack of communication and from the screenshots posted here its very clear to me the entire project had a lack of communication to it. We are several orders of magnitude from what multiple people in this thread are trying to imply that ryver attempted to extort money from a free project. Volunteer projects by their nature are composite objects. If i had to guess Ryver joined "to contribute" and rooster accepted him "To finish it". A mismatch of expectations like this happens all of the time in this game and the issue is once again just a lack of communication. Fair criticism to levy but again not even close to trying to extort money. You guys need to chill.
  3. You are part of the problem if you cryo when the antag does something you do not like.

    1. Show previous comments  4 more
    2. geeves
    3. Carver


      While I rarely cryo if I join a round, I'd rather see people cryo than force themselves to sit through it and either AFK or play spitefully. The latter cause far more problems than cryoing ever would.

    4. Garnascus


      Role play is fundamentally a grand game of improv. The golden rule of improv is to say "yes". Thus, individual actors are continuously able to play off one another. Cryoing because the antags show up and do something you do not like is saying NO. 

  4. I have an issue with a lot of criticism on this thread. You're all entitled to your opinion but I do not think its fair to -1 this app because he asked for money. As it seems to be written here Ryver did some amount of work for a particular project. Then asked for payment to do any additional work. He did not attempt to charge for work he already had done. I think if you have are being even the slightest bit charitable to ryverstyx you will find a number of reasons he would do this that are completely reasonable such as... Ryverstyx underestimating the work required for the project Ryverstyx gaining new constraints on his time thus putting the free time he does have at a premium I do not think There is anything wrong with asking for payment for further contribution. Agreements between parties get re-negotiated all the time for perfectly legitimate reasons. I think the sprite work you have done looks good and i can easily +1 this app.
  5. Alberyk and I have discussed this issue at length and reviewed all of the evidence presented. Danse will be receiving a warning for his conduct. While you did not harass any lore developers directly you where overtly mean spirited in your views on diona. It can be emotionally draining to see mean spirited comments about your work as a lore dev repeated on our platforms. While we are not directly taking action against you for attempting to delete evidence it is something we must explicitly discourage. It is really not a good look. Just relax a bit.
  6. By skull Good luck in life. You taught me a lot.
  7. Really impressive work here. I can easily tell just from the screenshots what the areas are. This gets a snail of approval.
  8. What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I'll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I've been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I'm the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You're fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that's just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little "clever" comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn't, you didn't, and now you're paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You're fucking dead, kiddo.
  9. Yes, along with everything that happened after which has been explained in this thread already. Locking and archiving.
  10. I imagine take the body to the medical morgue and then thats it. No i am afraid not. I do not believe there is much else to be said here. This will be locked and archived within 24 hours.
  11. Considering your notes on borg and AI play a day ban does seem reasonable in this case.
  12. Alright, well it seems to me retrieving the xenobotanist was reasonable. Everything after that does make me scratch my head a bit. Its just not your job to take the body to security to be autopsied. It is medical's job to release cadavers.
  13. @MattAtlas Is it true that the person injured was in his department? What should anselm have done differently here?
  14. Want to join my Curse of Strahd campaign? Two open slots. Read this document if interested. DM me on discord. https://docs.google.com/document/d/152qgSkATzApO2yAo9vvKdb4SMpTk63X4UwAaMdt65A8/edit?usp=sharing

  15. Dekser was not involved in the situation that resulted in this ban. Sue and M8 witnessed events where matt alledges you broke the rules previously and thus help explain why he banned you instead of warning you.
  16. Alright so, a lot of this is a lot of posting about the rules but what actually happened during the round in which @AnselmKonrad was banned? @MattAtlas .
  17. This guide is being written to communicate some useful information for you should you desire to make a staff complaint. While we will try our best to read almost any complaint, the more coherent and concise yours is, the easier our snail brains can digest what you are trying to say. Step 1. Identify and communicate the staff action you are contesting. We need to know why you are making a staff complaint. Start by clearly stating the specific ban, note, warning or other directive that you are contesting. If possible take a screenshot of it and include it in your complaint. While it is possible for us to search up your player history it takes extra time. You help us help you by including this information. Step 2. Clearly lay out your reasoning for contesting the staff action. While it may seem reasonable to begin explaining your perspective of events in question this starts off on the wrong foot. We can struggle sometimes to figure out your reasoning for creating a staff complaint if said reason is buried halfway through your post. Instead, begin with your main argument and then list your supporting evidence. As an example let's say you were warned for killing another player without proper escalation. You might format your first few sentences like this. I was given a warning by joe schmoe for killing the chef without proper escalation. I believe I did in fact have proper escalation as he had spent a good portion of the round harassing me which I will now detail Step 3. Avoid common missteps Please do not apologize for making a complaint. We empathize with the idea that a staff complaint is an aggressive action. However, our team views a staff complaint as a dialogue. Even the most professional and well maintained teams make mistakes. We expect them and deal with them with courtesy. Please be concise. This bears mentioning even though it is stated in the rules for the staff complaint subforum. A long complaint filled with erroneous and irrelevant information dilutes our ability to properly handle it. At worst it can affect our judgement of the situation and at best it extends the time for a judgement to be reached.
  18. I have some concerns regarding this application. As I understand it you recently came back from a break from the game? You seem to have some issues with how our staff team operates and want to change it for the better. It feels as if you're being pretty adversarial to what should be your team mates if you became a trial mod. I mean you quite literally say that certain staff are "not up to standard". How do you expect to be able to work with staff who you feel are so lacking? You also detail an interaction you had with a staff member in which you felt belittled. From the wording in the sentence you wrote I reckon it is @Pratepresidenten who said that. "That is just how he is" is an excuse used a lot to excuse abusive and horrible behavior but our very own pratepresidenten is anything but that. He is a living embodiment of OwO, occasionally it gets the better of him but I believe he was just trying to be friendly.
  19. So, can delta ever re-apply or not? I see on the web interface he has only lost a head whitelist once. I think if we want to bar players from attaining a head whitelist it should be internally consistent with our policy of appealing permanent bans. Which is to say "Not happening after the second permaban".
  20. Will look into this. As @ShesTrying is screenshotted here i will ask them to post their side of things. Though the screenshot seems to detail most of it. Where any others on the team involved in this decision?
  21. Ok i understand. Locking and archiving as OP has retracted this complaint.
  22. Well, according to the screenshot bear posted he tries asking "whats going on" then the guy is grabbed and neckgrabbed WHILE bear is standing there. then the guy tries removing the PDA of the guy he has neckgrabbed in which case bear throws his tear gas grenade.
  23. Didn't @Bear see the antag attacking "SOMEONE" just not knowing who? Isnt bear kind of obligated to step in and stop this?
  • Create New...