OtaconPliskin Posted April 28, 2015 Posted April 28, 2015 OtaconPliskin Total Ban Length: One week Banning staff member's Key: callum9987 Reason of Ban: Stealing from an SSD, being a general asshat Reason for Appeal: I do apologize for not fully grasping the rules of the server but assure that if my ban is lifted early (and even if it isn't) upon my return there won't be any further issues with my RPing and/or general server etiquette.
SierraKomodo Posted April 28, 2015 Posted April 28, 2015 You were talked to about that very issue, for launching an SSD person out the chapel space launch thing after stealing his ID. Scopes had you read the rules, you quoted the exact rule regarding SSD persons to him in ahelp, and told him it would not happen again. Later, in the very same round, you stole from another SSD person, and gave the moderator that ahelped you for that issue the same story. How do we know this won't happen again, if you've already gone against your own word in the same round?
OtaconPliskin Posted April 28, 2015 Author Posted April 28, 2015 You do not. I am, however, willing to say that if I go against the rules again; Submit me to a permaban. With that at stake, I have no choice but to comply or risk not being able to play again.
Serveris Posted April 29, 2015 Posted April 29, 2015 (edited) I understand the stealing from SSDs/killing them being a fault, but did the banning moderator really list, ' being a general asshat' in your ban reason? That seems a tad unprofessional to me. What else did they do that warranted a ban this length, in detail, aside from, 'being an asshat?' I presume that there were several more incidents leading up to this. EDIT: Tweaked in response to Baka's validation. Edited April 29, 2015 by Guest
Baka Posted April 29, 2015 Posted April 29, 2015 I can attest that the ban reasoning had no instance of "being an asshat" in it.
OtaconPliskin Posted April 29, 2015 Author Posted April 29, 2015 It's listed in the ban reason as various, no, no real gods honest called out asshattery, noone actually said that. Lool
Skull132 Posted April 29, 2015 Posted April 29, 2015 We're inclined to let the ban stay in place. It's a timed ban provided for constantly failing to read and acknowledge the rules (considering that two warnings were issued for the exact same violation in the span of 7 days). The promise of, "Effective now I will adhere to the rules," sounds a little flat when you consider ignoring the different warnings that were issued prior. Further more, you've attempted a string of sign-ins with an alternate account. Which is not a pleasant sign for us.
OtaconPliskin Posted April 29, 2015 Author Posted April 29, 2015 We're inclined to let the ban stay in place. It's a timed ban provided for constantly failing to read and acknowledge the rules (considering that two warnings were issued for the exact same violation in the span of 7 days). The promise of, "Effective now I will adhere to the rules," sounds a little flat when you consider ignoring the different warnings that were issued prior. Further more, you've attempted a string of sign-ins with an alternate account. Which is not a pleasant sign for us. Fair. See you in a few days.
Skull132 Posted April 29, 2015 Posted April 29, 2015 Appeal denied. Player will have to wait the ban out. Locking and archiving.
Recommended Posts