FearTheBlackout Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago BYOND Key: SimpleMaroon Staff BYOND Key: connorjg1 Game ID: cx5-aIX2 (this is the game ID for the round where the incident occurred that had Pleig IRed in the first place, though more will be elaborated on below of course) Reason for complaint: About a year ago now, my character, Za'Akaix'Pleig C'thur, was involved in an incident report actioned by Myphicbowser that resulted in her being permanently taken out of play from the current setting. This complaint is to contest the decisions made by Connor, who was on the Vaurca lore team at the time and now the lead Vaurca lore writer -- though I don't think I can enact this complaint against Desven, the head of Vaurca lore at the time since he's retired -- and Evandorf, the CCIA member who investigated the incident report and presumably made the final judgment. I disagree with the conclusion on two primary bases: I acknowledge that Pleig did assault a Nralakk and C'thur consular officer, which affects the conclusion heavily, but Pleig didn't inflict any actual injuries, nor did she intend to at any point with the attacks she performed. I know this because I intentionally had her punches pulled the entire time the conflict lasted. There's also the IC consideration, with that said, that both parties are Vaurcae with protective exoskeletons, and Loxs'tor'nok's, as a Ta, was even thicker than Pleig's, who is a warrior. Pleig was, to my recollection (this was a year ago), almost, if not completely complaint with the Security department at the time after the conflict occurred, though I recall her not wanting to face Loxs'tor'nok again afterward for what could be considered fair reason. From every point after the round, she was compliant with the West Phoenixport Law Center, as well as the Biesellite delegates who came on the final round to extract her, only showing mild to moderate hostility towards Loxs'tor'nok and the Nralakk delegates out of fear and dislike. With all of that said, my only desire from this complaint is a reversal of her removal from the ship and her requirement to go into hiding on Mictlan. Evidence/logs/etc: The IR post can be read here. I don't personally possess any logs relevant to the IR round or the rounds proceeding it, but hopefully the game ID can elucidate. Additional remarks: I'd spoken to Connor through DMs once before asking them about my options regarding having Pleig return, and they said at the time that any kind of IR appeal would be unlikely, hence my creation of this complaint after some time to consider. 2
CatsinHD Posted 31 minutes ago Posted 31 minutes ago After going over the logs and communication with @Melariara, we've determined that the decision to PK Pleig was a joint action between CCIA and Lore. Ultimately, regardless of whether damages occurred, the nature of assaulting a consular and Ta, especially by a queenless, was determined to be enough by Vaurca lore to PK the character regardless of whether it was minor assault or not. CCIA was compliant with this as both a lore decision and due to the nature of assaulting a consular from a nation the SCC is actively seeking improved relations with. With that being said, at the time both you and the agent found an agreement in how Pleig was to be removed, and all parties agreed before the IR was closed. There isn't much to justify lifting the decision to lift the termination, so the current ruling will stand.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now