Jump to content

Roostercat 9/24/23


Recommended Posts

Posted

BYOND Key: IckySoup
Staff BYOND Key: Roostercat
Game ID: Discord Video_Game Channel 12:30 PM - 1:40 PM EST 
Reason for complaint: No rule was broken
Evidence/logs/etc: 

The strike: image.thumb.png.54abde555f6046fcacc2269abe3d258e.png

The conversation topic was about discord user just_lanze asking for an opponent for a game. I asked what the game was, they elaborated. I followed by suggesting they could use ChatGPT, a little bit of back and forth happens and then image.png.c16eb9d986554125ed0169c7e48e2718.png at which point my ADHD brain is locked in and demands I defend my suggestion. I dropped a couple links in chat to the steam workshop for a couple of games I knew that had ChatGPT mods as proof. My suggestion wasn't a joke or satire of any form. Before I finished addressing my stance as being called shit talk Just_Lanse says my comments are strange, which I don't believe they were. I didn't get to address that before, Just_Lanse clarifies they wanted a human opponent at which I was going to move on, a couple of moments after this comment Rootercat gave me a strike.

In short, I was accused of shit talking, defended my stance, then punished for it. 


Additional remarks: 

Posted

It's pretty simple. They asked you to stop because they were just genuinely trying to find someone to play with, and you proceeded to continue after multiple repeated requests to stop. The links to chatGPT games was after like the third request to stop. Thus you broke the don't be a dick rule.

Posted

Roostercat, please ignore my post if you only want to shittalk. 

You have two options now. Agree you are shittalking and stop responding, or disagree you are shittalking and continue responding, at which you will ignore my request to stop talking to you. Which road will you take?

 

Posted

I dont appreciate you citing me out of context. Yes, I agree that I could have worded it better and I should have not used the term "shittalk", yet you post this out of context on purpose. Let's look at it from the beginning. I posted a very clear request, looking for an opponent in a game I know some in the community play, I just couldn't remember who it was:

Screenshot2023-09-25230348.thumb.png.d432a6a6bb17c21be845fcd9c30d4c88.png
 

You asked me what it was, I elaborated. Then you proceeded to post this, on your own:

Screenshot2023-09-25230358.png.feff6d1171ce8265c94b476f4117606c.png

Which was both unasked for and already derailing my initial post. I admit that I got a bit annoyed because I come home after quite the long day and just wanted to see if someone wants to play a game I also play against me, since I recently picked it up again, resulting in this:

Screenshot2023-09-25230150.png.26505264a4c969c36963813f3d63eaa8.png

As you can see I politely ask you to stop commenting if you only want to de-rail/ignore my initial post. You didn't stop and I politely asked you again:

Screenshot2023-09-25230201.png.bc2e0023071495b331bf73c459534fb9.png

At this point Rooster stepped in. Please don't cite me out of context, it is not fair to do.

  • Like 1
Posted

Since my last post was removed, ill retype it. @KingOfThePing the language you used to end the conversation initially was not polite. It was the opposite. Rude and antagonistic. It was uncalled for. Your opening post called for "an opponent". My comments of a ChatGPT AI opponent were within your post criteria until you clarified that with your last comment before I got struck.image.png.b067f208ace3611795c4b3bf309ab7b4.png

Posted
7 hours ago, ReadThisNamePlz said:

Hi, I will be handling this. Also @Ickysoup Do not post stuff like the YT video in a complaint. 

YT in general or that one specifically? I was trying to make a point with it, which may not have come off the way I wanted it to.

Posted

If you really want to go down that route and dissect my initial post then I cannot talk about specifics with ChatGPT/an AI opponent (something I specifically mentioned in my initial post) nor can ChatGPT use PBEM (Play BE-Mail).

Since you knew that (why else would you respond in the first place) and still posted this I must assume ill intent. We could go on about this forever but I don't think that it is leading somewhere nor will I entertain that. What about "please just let it be" is rude only you know, but you are free to feel like that.

Posted

Alright, I do not really need to look into anything else. 

You acknowledge what you did wrong with 

On 24/09/2023 at 19:25, Ickysoup said:

at which point my ADHD brain is locked in and demands I defend my suggestion

And @Roostercat is right, when someone asks you repeatedly to stop something and you don't, then you're just being a dick. 
Ping did not want to play with ChatGPT. They wanted someone real to play with. You didn't respect that, and continued to push your idea onto them. 

Because of this, the strike will remain withstanding. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...