Covert0ddity - General Staff Consensus.

[Covert0ddity]

BYOND Key: Covert0ddity

Total Ban Length: Permanant.

Banning staff member's Key: General staff consensus at the time. Issueing: Skull132.

Reason of Ban: General staff consensus. Abuse of admin positions to break Rule 1 a multitude of times. Read: Being a cock.

Reason for Appeal:

Hello. It's been some time, and I hope everything goes well. I'd like to put this out there, as I have a want to return to the community as a productive member. The previous actions of myself are not to be discarded, of course, as they are all atrocious in their own right. The abuse of aministrator status is a serious thing; something that I shouldn't have taken so lightly.

But I would like to contest the permanent ban, if not becuase I want to play, but because I feel like I can help the community again. Aurora has evolved a different way since I've been gone, for better or for worse, and in either case I'd like to have a standing change in that. I want to make a difference, if not in the RP and general 'set standard you want to see yourself' ingame, but also in the Lore. I hope to resume my status as loredev, (At least with the Vaurca,) and simple: Help out.

I'm not sure what else to say. Please, Aurora, I'm open to all questions, concerns, and etc.

[Covert0ddity]

BYOND Key: Covert0ddity

Total Ban Length: Permanant.

Banning staff member's Key: General staff consensus at the time. Issueing: Skull132.

Reason of Ban: General staff consensus. Abuse of admin positions to break Rule 1 a multitude of times. Read: Being a cock.

Reason for Appeal:

Hello. It's been some time, and I hope everything goes well. I'd like to put this out there, as I have a want to return to the community as a productive member. The previous actions of myself are not to be discarded, of course, as they are all atrocious in their own right. The abuse of aministrator status is a serious thing; something that I shouldn't have taken so lightly.

But I would like to contest the permanent ban, if not becuase I want to play, but because I feel like I can help the community again. Aurora has evolved a different way since I've been gone, for better or for worse, and in either case I'd like to have a standing change in that. I want to make a difference, if not in the RP and general 'set standard you want to see yourself' ingame, but also in the Lore. I hope to resume my status as loredev, (At least with the Vaurca,) and simple: Help out.

I'm not sure what else to say. Please, Aurora, I'm open to all questions, concerns, and etc.

[hivefleetchicken]

the robots are onto you

In all seriousness I was the person who initiated the sequence of covert getting banned and he's not nearly half as bad as a lot of people here as he used to be.

[hivefleetchicken]

the robots are onto you

In all seriousness I was the person who initiated the sequence of covert getting banned and he's not nearly half as bad as a lot of people here as he used to be.

[Frances]

There's actually one thing which always bugged me a bit. I guess it'd be for Skull to clarify, but surrounding the exact circumstances of your perma.

Basically, the incidents that happened as I know consisted of a few cases of adminabuse (releasing the singulo) along with throwing brains at Hivefleetchicken and trying to mock him for ERP he didn't engage in.

At the time, I opted to first demote you from adminship, then kick you out of the staff (with everybody's agreement) because the problems continued. I believe the stuff with Hive happened around the time of your demotion to a normal user.

Unless I'm wrong, there was a noticeable gap in time between you doing those things/being booted from the staff, and being permabanned, despite no further incidents occurring (that I know of). What you later told me on skype was that the staff in power (after I left/went on hiatus) asked you to post a public apology for your actions under coercion of a perma, and then decided to perma you anyway, I'm not really sure why.

I've always wondered what happened around that because I find it very puzzling.

That aside, I think you were banned for issues of character, and considering it's been nearly a year since all this, I do believe you could've had the time to reform your behavior and sort out whatever faults caused you to run into conflict with other people here. (Plus I don't think what you did was even perma-worthy, the abuse of admin/mod powers was already punished with the loss of your rank.)

I don't know if many members of the current staff were even around back in the time you were active here, but for those who weren't, I give my recommendation to grant you a second chance.

[Frances]

There's actually one thing which always bugged me a bit. I guess it'd be for Skull to clarify, but surrounding the exact circumstances of your perma.

Basically, the incidents that happened as I know consisted of a few cases of adminabuse (releasing the singulo) along with throwing brains at Hivefleetchicken and trying to mock him for ERP he didn't engage in.

At the time, I opted to first demote you from adminship, then kick you out of the staff (with everybody's agreement) because the problems continued. I believe the stuff with Hive happened around the time of your demotion to a normal user.

Unless I'm wrong, there was a noticeable gap in time between you doing those things/being booted from the staff, and being permabanned, despite no further incidents occurring (that I know of). What you later told me on skype was that the staff in power (after I left/went on hiatus) asked you to post a public apology for your actions under coercion of a perma, and then decided to perma you anyway, I'm not really sure why.

I've always wondered what happened around that because I find it very puzzling.

That aside, I think you were banned for issues of character, and considering it's been nearly a year since all this, I do believe you could've had the time to reform your behavior and sort out whatever faults caused you to run into conflict with other people here. (Plus I don't think what you did was even perma-worthy, the abuse of admin/mod powers was already punished with the loss of your rank.)

I don't know if many members of the current staff were even around back in the time you were active here, but for those who weren't, I give my recommendation to grant you a second chance.

[Guest Menown]

Only post if involved. If you are not a moderator or administrator and were not involved in the specific incident that led to the ban, you may not reply to a ban appeal regarding that incident.

[Guest Menown]

Only post if involved. If you are not a moderator or administrator and were not involved in the specific incident that led to the ban, you may not reply to a ban appeal regarding that incident.

[Covert0ddity]

Meow, I don't think that's relevant here. Both Hivefleet and Frances were involved with the issue at the time, and I honestly welcome the opinion of anyone about this issue. There's no need to put a silencer on anyone.

[Covert0ddity]

Meow, I don't think that's relevant here. Both Hivefleet and Frances were involved with the issue at the time, and I honestly welcome the opinion of anyone about this issue. There's no need to put a silencer on anyone.

[Skull132]

Unless I'm wrong, there was a noticeable gap in time between you doing those things/being booted from the staff, and being permabanned, despite no further incidents occurring (that I know of).

 

He went inactive, and so the issue was stowed for review once it became prudent again. Once it was back up, the issue was reviewed with all staff in attendance, to provide a fresher perspective. Consider it sort of like dealing with cold cases, once they heat up again.

 

What you later told me on skype was that the staff in power (after I left/went on hiatus) asked you to post a public apology for your actions under coercion of a perma, and then decided to perma you anyway, I'm not really sure why.

 

And this is simply not true. The apology that Covert posted, he did so of his own volition, fully knowing the decision that was made before he posted it. In fact, it was made clear to him that an apology is not what we're looking for, but let's keep going. Point one, I never care for apologies. And I would never ask someone for an apology, not as a member of staff. Point two, date of apology post: 20Apr2015; date of ban: 2015-04-19.

Now, if Covert did in fact tell that to FFrances, then I'd probably tell him to go and get bent. Again. Because dishonesty like that is what landed him in that issue in the first place. Of course, the discussion could have been ages old, which is why I'm going to square my own self away, and stick with a response of, "Eh. Eh. Eh. Eh."

And also, contrary to what you believe, FFrances, there are people who still remember and continue to play here. People who were affected by Covert's actions as an admin, and as a regular player.

[Skull132]

Unless I'm wrong, there was a noticeable gap in time between you doing those things/being booted from the staff, and being permabanned, despite no further incidents occurring (that I know of).

 

He went inactive, and so the issue was stowed for review once it became prudent again. Once it was back up, the issue was reviewed with all staff in attendance, to provide a fresher perspective. Consider it sort of like dealing with cold cases, once they heat up again.

 

What you later told me on skype was that the staff in power (after I left/went on hiatus) asked you to post a public apology for your actions under coercion of a perma, and then decided to perma you anyway, I'm not really sure why.

 

And this is simply not true. The apology that Covert posted, he did so of his own volition, fully knowing the decision that was made before he posted it. In fact, it was made clear to him that an apology is not what we're looking for, but let's keep going. Point one, I never care for apologies. And I would never ask someone for an apology, not as a member of staff. Point two, date of apology post: 20Apr2015; date of ban: 2015-04-19.

Now, if Covert did in fact tell that to FFrances, then I'd probably tell him to go and get bent. Again. Because dishonesty like that is what landed him in that issue in the first place. Of course, the discussion could have been ages old, which is why I'm going to square my own self away, and stick with a response of, "Eh. Eh. Eh. Eh."

And also, contrary to what you believe, FFrances, there are people who still remember and continue to play here. People who were affected by Covert's actions as an admin, and as a regular player.

[TechnoKat]

And also, contrary to what you believe, FFrances, there are people who still remember and continue to play here. People who were affected by Covert's actions as an admin, and as a regular player.

 

Been downed, shot down and many more by Covert, the way you point this out is like some players have PTSD of his actions in a game, like what, seriously. It's been a long time and some people like and enjoy playing with Covert, I see no reason to keep him banned.

[TechnoKat]

And also, contrary to what you believe, FFrances, there are people who still remember and continue to play here. People who were affected by Covert's actions as an admin, and as a regular player.

 

Been downed, shot down and many more by Covert, the way you point this out is like some players have PTSD of his actions in a game, like what, seriously. It's been a long time and some people like and enjoy playing with Covert, I see no reason to keep him banned.

[Skull132]

Been downed, shot down and many more by Covert, the way you point this out is like some players have PTSD of his actions in a game, like what, seriously.

 

That isn't fully what I had in mind. Covert had a way of creating drama where none needed to be. He and the people involved know what I'm getting at, it's their matter to sort that out, regardless of how the appeal ends. Not ours.

[Skull132]

Been downed, shot down and many more by Covert, the way you point this out is like some players have PTSD of his actions in a game, like what, seriously.

 

That isn't fully what I had in mind. Covert had a way of creating drama where none needed to be. He and the people involved know what I'm getting at, it's their matter to sort that out, regardless of how the appeal ends. Not ours.

[TechnoKat]

I've yet to see a heavy drama carried over to forums because of him, because there's been more nowadays than before, mostly beginning with staff. Anybody punished? No, even the blatant one's are still playing.(which I'm very sure many know of).

[TechnoKat]

I've yet to see a heavy drama carried over to forums because of him, because there's been more nowadays than before, mostly beginning with staff. Anybody punished? No, even the blatant one's are still playing.(which I'm very sure many know of).

[Skull132]

Touche. But the times were somewhat different at the time. Anyways, we'll see what the rest have to say, shall we?

[Skull132]

Touche. But the times were somewhat different at the time. Anyways, we'll see what the rest have to say, shall we?

[Guest]

Been downed, shot down and many more by Covert, the way you point this out is like some players have PTSD of his actions in a game, like what, seriously.

 

That isn't fully what I had in mind. Covert had a way of creating drama where none needed to be. He and the people involved know what I'm getting at, it's their matter to sort that out, regardless of how the appeal ends. Not ours.

 

Uh, okay. I guess passive-aggressively suggesting that the OP go get bent really helps prove your point here. Assuming you're attempting to make one here.

[Guest]

Been downed, shot down and many more by Covert, the way you point this out is like some players have PTSD of his actions in a game, like what, seriously.

 

That isn't fully what I had in mind. Covert had a way of creating drama where none needed to be. He and the people involved know what I'm getting at, it's their matter to sort that out, regardless of how the appeal ends. Not ours.

 

Uh, okay. I guess passive-aggressively suggesting that the OP go get bent really helps prove your point here. Assuming you're attempting to make one here.

[Skull132]

I was simply offering insight, as was requested of me. And I added my own opinion on the matter, with a conditional expletive. As the Head Admin at the time of making the decision, I imagine that's relevant? No? I also did explain why my opinion would have been as it was.

Although, I don't imagine the sparking here will be enjoyed by Doom. So how about we take this elsewhere?

[Skull132]

I was simply offering insight, as was requested of me. And I added my own opinion on the matter, with a conditional expletive. As the Head Admin at the time of making the decision, I imagine that's relevant? No? I also did explain why my opinion would have been as it was.

Although, I don't imagine the sparking here will be enjoyed by Doom. So how about we take this elsewhere?

[hivefleetchicken]

Since no one else is saying it, I'm gonna' have to ask you lot to keep things on subject or get out.

And post if you're involved only. That too. If you don't have something constructive to add, then it isn't worth Doom or the OP's time.