CatsinHD

For any paperwork needs, I recommend using the information present on the Guide to Paperwork. This provides all pencode needed to make forms. Ever since the great passing of the Example Paperwork page, may it rest in peace, there has been a criminally low amount of paperwork forms available for people to tinker around with for their own purposes. While I have not created a ton of paperwork, there are some general trends I have picked up on. And also I was told that making a post for people to share their forms on and discuss their tips on paperwork creation would be liked. While I would like to claim to be a paperwork genius, at the end of the day I tend to stick to a single format, the CCIA format. I won't waffle on about technical writing and such. Both because it isn't the most applicable here (see the wiki for that) and I won't act like my singular course in the matter makes me an expert. In honesty, I make things up as I go, or re-use the CCIA format which remains a venerable format. It is pretty plug and play, not requiring too much effort to bend it to your uses. However, other forms will be discussed later on. When it comes to paperwork forms, CCIA uses a pretty consistent format. The key details are: A border around the form Use of horizontal line [hr] to break up sections An organization logo/flag (in CCIA's case, the SCC logo) A form name and number Index (for internal logging) Date Commonly, Employee and Signature lines Bolded prompts So, what we get at a basic level is this: This is the most basic CCIA-style form. It has a border, separates sections with horizontal lines, and is concise and to the point. This is perfectly fine for SCC-based organizations and is quite flexible to your needs. Want to make it a fax? At a To, From, Subject, and Signature lines. In fact, a basic faxing form is on the Guide to Faxes (which you should read before sending faxes)! Want a medical waiver? Add some legal jargon and add some signatures and name fields. Some tips when writing information prewritten on the form (I.E. printing automatically and not filled in by an individual such as signature or name). Be dry. Don't worry about sounding dull or overly corporate. Forms are meant to be this way! Embrace the corporate style of writing. What if CCIA-style forms aren't your style, or don't make sense for your organization? Well, don't worry. There is a wonderful website I use to create new forms found here: https://ps.ss13.net/#instructions This shows you how the paper will format when made, and is amazing for messing around with pencode to find the right style. So what about some tips and examples? Use the table border. This will add a definite end to your forms and make them look a little tidier than text slapped onto a blank white paper. Use bold to your advantage. Bold words call attention to themselves and, additionally, add separation for mundane text. Don't overuse small. While small can make a form look very crisp and clerical, overuse can mean that you lose the ability to add small text to a document. This is especially problematic in legal documentation. Keep colorful imagery and organizational information at the top. Flags, logos, names, etc. should remain at the top. This keeps a clean look and also avoids some of the messiness adding flags/logos can force into the format. Separate out sections. This is to avoid a long never-ending wall of text. Find sections of related information and cut them apart from the rest. This can be done with either headers (bold, large text. [h1] and [h2] also work) or horizonal lines [hr]. When in doubt, find an IRL example to take inspiration from. For instance, TCAF forms may be loosely based on IRL American documents. Here are some exmaples: Konyang Arrest Form (Authored by Ben10083, posted by Greenjoe within this same forum topic) This form is very nice on many levels. First of all, it follows technical writing expectations. Namely, a hierarchy of headers (Bold and large for primary, smaller bold for secondary, underlined for alternative secondary). The horizontal lines break up the flow of the paper into chunks of related information and avoids the dread of one long mega paper. The header is simple but also fancy with side-by-side logo and organizational information. Small, indented text is utilized for notations that are otherwise not vital to the form. SCC Surgery Release Form (Authored and posted by 20nypercent within this same forum topic) This form is a different take on the CCIA-style format. It borrows the general layout of organizational information at the top, date and index, disclaimers, subject, and signatures/stamps. However, the main changes are the boxed organizational header at the top. Much like the Konyang form, it is clean and professional. To end off, I should note that this isn't the end all be all for forms. In most situations, re-using a format from others, such as the ones above, and replacing certain elements to fit your needs is a common and acceptable trend. I would encourage anyone who has formats they would like to share to post them in this thread. I will expand this post as I can (and as I remember to). Also, if anyone has any questions or anything that I should add, just lmk on Discord (CatsinHD#4202) or here. I know some people want all of the CCIA forms posted here as well and... that is a little unwieldy with how many forms there are. I may post sanitized version for medical, engineering, etc. later on. Until then, here you are.

Sadly I could not screencap this in time. I shall describe the scene. A Ta has chosen to defend her hive. Thermal Lance in hand, she faces down security. The final words are said: "I have chosen to defend my hive... so I must use this." The lance is aimed at the security IPC. Then, with one final action, a deafening click rings across the medical lobby. The lance was on safe.

The Mice queen

I've experience most of Frank's characters to varying degrees, most recently Nikita. His characters are enjoyable to RP with, especially when dragging in lore elements to give that extra bit of immersion and depth. I have confidence he can play an IPC, and thus I give a +1

After some delay... Application Accepted Somone will reach out to you soon (or already has) to provide proper roles and access.

So, a few things to note. It is codified, sorta. To quote the Guide to Standard Operation Procedure: Under heading Horizon Weapons Systems This dictates quite explicitly BC and operations. Engineering is not mentioned as part of the weapon operation process. If a BC is subverting operations by using engineering to operate the weapons it is still a breach of SOP and should be treated as such. This is corroborated on other pages. The Hangar Technician page: The Engineer page at no points list reloading the weapons as a duty. They should not be reloading weapons; it is outside of their duties. And the Guide to Gunnery: If Bridge Crew are subverting Operations without reason for reloading the weapons, either go to command or ahelp. It is, now, a core part of the role of the department. Engineering is required to maintain the weapons. They are the only department capable of repairing them when weapons do get damaged or experience wear and tear, as is mentioned in the quote from above on the Guide to Gunnery. The SOP entry could be reworded if it is truly causing issues, I'll bring it up with the team and see about their thoughts. Otherwise, though, there is enough material to go to Command or ahelp about it. It is removing gameplay from a department who really could use something to do during combat.

You also completely missed the point of my response. I specifically brought out the context of the MD ruling because of what it responded to: a simplification of the attacking process beyond even what you describe the pen dagger to be. It is quite literally click and drag onto the target (assuming safety is off). No response, no indication. Truly invisible (especially if the silenced pistol could do this). The boot knife, as far as I'm aware, can be drawn using an action in the top right window. The object tab iirc. I'm not entirely sure on this, but my point isn't hurt by this either. A gun can do this just as well. You press H, ensure you're on harm intent, and click. RNG is the only savior for the target. The downside being it's visible. Take another example, a butterfly knife. Butterfly knives can sit in your pocket, which isn't revealed by examining. Click, activate, viola a knife. Most people can do this very quickly. Small guns can do the same, even removing the step to activate it. Just click from the pocket and harm intent click. This is so common, many antags and secoffs do this with great effect. It is not particularly different to any other weapon especially the concealed cane which is already in the game. TG is the inspiration of the idea, but thankfully we have the ability to modify how things are implemented as we desire. There are ways to address, you had one idea. Add an extra set to convert the pen, then activate it to turn on the laser blade. The benefit is that if you're searched, it's concealed. No one will know and you get to keep it, which is better than a boot knife which can be found (and requires a boot), or any other manner of weapons that are overtly weapons and would get you arrested/searched. That is the trade-off. Concealment for quick easy use. Either way, I think it's a neat idea. I'll leave it to the maintainers to decide either here or in a PR if one is made.

I don't think that ruling necessarily applies here. That MD was in regard to a weapon firing from a storage slot, meaning you can shoot someone with no lead up or indication. It goes from nothing to bang. The Idea mentioned by OP is a concealable dagger, but it still has to wielded and activated in hand before it can be used. It provides no real advantage over a boot knife in a fight in terms of first shot advantage. It goes from nothing, to in hand (optionally, activate as well), to stab. Essentially, the weapon should have to be in hand (and thus visible) to be used.