[Denied] James View's Command Whitelist Application

[HighAdmiral]

Just now, Roostercat said:

That "One negative thing" Had us chasing the librarian for 15 minutes and Almost got them brigged for Infiltration. The AI just letting people into their core then taking that long to clarify is not what I would call exceptional HRP.

You didn't "chase" the librarian. He went straight back to the library because he didn't do anything wrong. Clarification was immediate whenever I was asked, you did not play a head of staff and could not see the command channel. You didn't trust your HoS to do his job, and now you're saltily -1ing me over a single event. 

Thank you for your feedback, it will be noted in my future roleplay scenarios.

[Roostercat]

1 minute ago, HighAdmiral said:

saltily -1ing me over a single event. 

Thank you for your feedback, it will be noted in my future roleplay scenarios.

I am not salty at all. I am concerned that you want to play a Head of Staff when you do MRP shit on purpose because you think it will get a laugh. And the fact that you are accusing me of being salty just based on feedback just makes me think you are unfit for the role even more.

[HighAdmiral]

2 minutes ago, Roostercat said:

I am not salty at all. I am concerned that you want to play a Head of Staff when you do MRP shit on purpose because you think it will get a laugh. And the fact that you are accusing me of being salty just based on feedback just makes me think you are unfit for the role even more.

Frankly I don't give a shit about your opinion, that was a great round. You want to nail me for a mistake I immediately accepted responsibility and apologized for you're welcome to continue.

Edited November 20, 2019 by HighAdmiral

[Roostercat]

Just now, HighAdmiral said:

Frankly I don't give a shit about your opinion, 

And that hostility is precisely why I don't think you are ready for a Head whitelist yet. This feedback is meant to be constructive, I did not throw any insults at you or anything like that, I brought up an Issue that you should look at and think about so that it doesn't happen again. You taking that feedback and insulting me for it is a very bad sign, as a Head that is incapable of taking feedback is destined to be a bad head, period.

[Roostercat]

4 minutes ago, HighAdmiral said:

Frankly I don't give a shit about your opinion, that was a great round. You want to nail me for a mistake I immediately accepted responsibility and apologized for you're welcome to continue.

Also, you never said anything about the mistake over radio, and I saw no real apologies in OOC. When a sec member asks you to explain your reasoning for asking them to Telecomms over the sec radio, you are expected to reply, all you did was repeat the same request repeatedly until the Captain explained it, 5 minutes later.

[HighAdmiral]

7 minutes ago, Roostercat said:

And that hostility is precisely why I don't think you are ready for a Head whitelist yet. This feedback is meant to be constructive, I did not throw any insults at you or anything like that, I brought up an Issue that you should look at and think about so that it doesn't happen again. You taking that feedback and insulting me for it is a very bad sign, as a Head that is incapable of taking feedback is destined to be a bad head, period.

I'm fine at taking feedback, which is why every time I play Binary I ask for feedback in OOC after every round. I'm quite new to AI. This isn't constructive criticism, this is you taking an issue you know I've already acknowledged and won't repeat and putting it on display in the only forum that matters. I'm not hostile because I don't care what you say. I don't care what you say because you're telling me something I already know, and acting like it's big new news.

 

7 minutes ago, Roostercat said:

Also, you never said anything about the mistake over radio, and I saw no real apologies in OOC. 

I both apologized to him in the library over holopad, and in OOC after round end.

7 minutes ago, Roostercat said:

When a sec member asks you to explain your reasoning for asking them to Telecomms over the sec radio, you are expected to reply, all you did was repeat the same request repeatedly until the Captain explained it, 5 minutes later.

I don't give a shit what role you've chosen for a round, when the captain tells me to do something in a discreet way, and asks I perform said duty discreetly, I won't explain it to anyone below the captain lest it violate laws. Which it very clearly didn't. That sense of entitlement is honestly sad. I'll explain it again though. The Detective had argued that because AI Upload is such a secure area, he should've known even with permission that he shouldn't have been there. The captain asked me to order the detective to Telecommunications, in hopes of proving said point the other way around. Unfortunately the HoS was too competent, and the plan failed.

[Roostercat]

7 minutes ago, HighAdmiral said:

 This isn't constructive criticism, this is you taking an issue you know I've already acknowledged and won't repeat and putting it on display in the only forum that matters. 

 

 

Actually, I don't stare at OOC very often, so if you did acknowledge it, sorry. But the issue still remains, and I think it shows bad attitude for someone applying to be a head.

10 minutes ago, HighAdmiral said:

 

I don't give a shit what role you've chosen for a round, when the captain tells me to do something in a discreet way, and asks I perform said duty discreetly, I won't explain it to anyone below the captain lest it violate laws. Which it very clearly didn't. That sense of entitlement is honestly sad. I'll explain it again though. The Detective had argued that because AI Upload is such a secure area, he should've known even with permission that he shouldn't have been there. The captain asked me to order the detective to Telecommunications, in hopes of proving said point the other way around. Unfortunately the HoS was too competent, and the plan failed.

The fact that you think bringing up a issue with your communication skills and lack of explanation is entitlement simply because I happened to play sec that round is sad. Especially when you didn't consider that we didn't know the captain had a plan in the first place. From our POV you were just telling the Det to go to telecomms over and over again for no reason. So do not mistake that for entitlement as a sec member.

[HighAdmiral]

Just now, Roostercat said:

Actually, I don't stare at OOC very often, so if you did acknowledge it, sorry. But the issue still remains, and I think it shows bad attitude for someone applying to be a head.

No worries, I don't often pay attention to OOC either. I'm simply clarifying a fact here.

 

1 minute ago, Roostercat said:

The fact that you think bringing up a issue with your communication skills and lack of explanation is entitlement simply because I happened to play sec that round is sad. Especially when you didn't consider that we didn't know the captain had a plan in the first place. From our POV you were just telling the Det to go to telecomms over and over again for no reason. So do not mistake that for entitlement as a sec member.

My lack of communication skill/explaination is intentional. You knowing what happened, and still complaining about me not telling you is literally the definition of entitlement, by being OOC upset with me for not sharing information I didn't intend for you to have. 

[Brutishcrab51]

Hey man, I've looked at this application. The contents of your character as I've seen, the characters you play and the general attitude you've brought to this application. I just think it's fair to say, I'm not entirely happy.

You need to take a step back. Stop insulting people when they provide fair critique of you as a player and for your characters, especially on an application when you're meant to turn the cheek and show your best. People aren't entitled when they make requests of an AI. They aren't entitled when they say "no" to the AI. The AI exists, with laws defining this existence, to serve at the whim of the crew. As according to rank and necessity. If the AI is giving people orders, it better say why, and it better say who told it to give those orders. If it doesn't, if it refuses to, crewmen are entirely within their rights to tell it to kick rocks.

I've seen your characters before. I'm not really impressed with their conduct, though I can tell you bring a serious sentiment to the server with how you play. I just don't think you're ready for a Command whitelist yet. I had 17 posts when I made my Command application, but I'd spent a long time meeting other characters and becoming known in the departments I played.

It's gonna' be a -1 from me. For now.

[Peppermint]

My first post here was fairly positive, but I have issues over the last round or two. I had a captain round a little bit ago and asked for volunteers for HoS. You immediately offered despite the fact that your sec play is honestly rather poor (Which is a whole other complaint), most likely through inexperience (I've seen you commenting as such during OOC discussion, so hopefully this isn't overly cruel). To still step forward into a vital role is rather off. I think it's important people know their limitations, especially as getting on the whitelist opens up all  command roles. It'd be really frustrating if you took the slot of a role you're not really ready for and had issues; I'm all for trials by fire, but there is a basic grounding that needs to be there first.

 

During said round, you also decided downing a bottle of zoom pills  was a good idea, and spent the rest of the round mentally retarded from the resulting OD. You claimed you didn't know what they did, but simple examine would have told you they cause brain damage. Bear in mind this was on a round where we were on blue alert less than twenty minutes in and needing command staff to baby you was a headache. I think you need to take roles more seriously as well as go in slow. If you don't know what you're doing as sec, join as a cadet. If you don't know what random pills do, ask medical. Accept your gaps in knowledge and work on them.

 

Sorry, but changing to a -1. 

[ReadThisNamePlz]

Hello, I apologize for the long wait. Some.. behind the scenes issues took place.

While, you're a good person and a hoot to have in the community, I don't believe you're command material just yet. If you improve your gameplay, cut down on the ic memes and get better feedback..  along with improving your interactions with the Administration/Moderation team, then we can revisit a command whitelist. But, for now... 

Also, insulting people on your application generally isn't a good idea.

Application Denied. Locking and Archiving within the next twenty four hours. 

Edited November 21, 2019 by ReadThisNamePlz