Zundy Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 Yeah I'm fine with this. The 2016 was just a jokey suggestion anyway. Link to comment
UnknownMurder Posted July 1, 2016 Author Share Posted July 1, 2016 Yeah I'm fine with this. The 2016 was just a jokey suggestion anyway. I was not joking when I said 2016, I actually meant it. It's in the Suggestion Thread and Title. Link to comment
Zundy Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 Yeah I'm fine with this. The 2016 was just a jokey suggestion anyway. I was not joking when I said 2016, I actually meant it. It's in the Suggestion Thread and Title. Fair. Link to comment
Carver Posted July 1, 2016 Share Posted July 1, 2016 What the hell, I didn't know it was a such of a big deal. That's what everyone's angry about? We always can bump up the age of winery to about 2279? That makes the wine 179 years old and it doesn't change anything. It's still a typical preserved wine/beer. At 179 years it's still rather likely to taste like ass, but, atleast it won't kill someone like the acid you'd be drinking from a bottle from 2016. Much more reasonable. I'm still calling bullshit on any beer being remotely close to something someone would drink even at 179 years, though, that would just be foul. Link to comment
Recommended Posts