Zelmana Posted May 15, 2017 Posted May 15, 2017 BYOND Key: Zelmana Staff BYOND Key: Tishinastalker Game ID (Not sure. Time of round given.): 2016-09-19 17:53:42 Reason for complaint: I received the following warning: "Posting extremely questionable content involving child pornography." after posting the following: DO NOT OPEN IF OFFENDED EASILY CONTAINS NON-NUDE PICTURE WARNING:ANIMATED CONTAINS HILLARY CLINTON MAY BE OFFENSIVE FOR ON-TOPIC EXAMPLE PURPOSES ONLY http://2static1.fjcdn.com/comments/Lmao+okay+hiloli+_c347259fc1801281d6df2bb23be17079.jpg Evidence/logs/etc:See above ^ Additional remarks: I believe that yes, perhaps it was wrong to post the image, but it was the topic of discussion in the OOC channel at the time. I completely understand if I receive a warning for this, but the description of it being "extremely questionable content involving child pornography" when it is non-nude, animated, and non-overtly sexual comes off as too harsh. When a staff member would look on my warning and see a warning for "questionable content including child pornography", they assume the worst. The image I posted is very very tame and is used in a joking manner at the time in the discussion. I believe the warning description inaccurately portrays both the situation and my overall personal behavior as a player. I do not wish this to impact my expansion of roleplay in terms of whitelist applications or general interaction with staff, and would request this to be dealt with at staff's will. Thank you all, sorry for the Hiloli Clinton.
TishinaStalker Posted May 15, 2017 Posted May 15, 2017 Absolutely not. I completely refuse to back down on the wording of the warning. I didn't budge back in September and I absolutely will not now. I know fully well my fellow moderation and administration team will back me up on this. I do not give a single care that there's no actual nudity in the image. You intentionally and knowingly posted an image whose entire purpose is to fetishize CHILDREN and that is just as bad. It is absolutely disgusting, immoral, and wrong. If that was your attempt at a joke, then you need a brand new sense of humor, you filthy degenerate. The only way that warning gets changed is if a headmin decides to go over my head for it.
Scheveningen Posted May 15, 2017 Posted May 15, 2017 You posted Shadman. I don't mean to be rude, but where on this fucking planet is that even remotely appropriate to post anywhere? Did you not put two neurons together to think on whether posting it would be a bad idea and would get administrative backlash? Had you even read the rules before posting that? I'm definitely going to say Tishina was in the right here for warning you. The wording of it isn't wrong either. That's just embarrassing for you to even post it on any public area on the server. Equally justified to get such a warning on the incident. Actions have consequences. I wouldn't have given you room to stand on after posting hiloli fucking clitton.
Zelmana Posted May 16, 2017 Author Posted May 16, 2017 I am not aware of what the implication of /Shadman/, nor do I know what that is, but after a quick google I realize that this image is from a comic of some rather disturbing stuff. I was under the illusion that this image was a satirical jab at Hillary Clinton by depicting them as a loli, not that this was a fetishisation of children (which I agree, Lolicon is.). I understand that Loli is a fairly disgusting / disturbing topic, which is why I found it humorous and related to the discussion in OOC about Hillary Clinton and how she was depicted as such. If memory serves me correct, a user requested to know the Know Your Meme of Hiloli Clinton, which was the subject of discussion. I direct linked to that page's image. As of now that page is taken down. I digress, I did not intentionally post this image to be a subject of fetishisation of children, and posted this image on the basis of the discussion of the absurdity of Hillary Clinton being satirically depicted in the image. Humorous? Maybe. Probably not. I have played on this server for nearly two years without any altercation or rule-breaking that warranted anything of this scale. I do realize the wrongness of the situation and take responsibility for this, but do feel that this will skew the perspective of those who view me. I posted this image thinking that it was a satirical depiction of Hillary Clinton found on Know Your Meme. I understand that this is wrong, but feel as though the description depicts me as someone who has posted actual nude and very-real images depicting children, instead of the picture posted. I understand that actions have consequences, but I did make an honest mistake and feel that the description implies that I am nefarious in my actions. If you do not change or alter it, I understand the reasoning, but would request that this complaint form be made private or removed. Thanks again.
Garnascus Posted May 19, 2017 Posted May 19, 2017 I do not wish this to impact my expansion of roleplay in terms of whitelist applications or general interaction with staff, and would request this to be dealt with at staff's will. Great, dont do that shit again and this is as far as it goes. You posted an image of a sexualized child and you only got a warning out of it. I am honestly kinda surprised thats all tish did. I do not see any reason to modify the warning in any way.
Recommended Posts