Chaznoodles

Aren't you the one we caught ERPing on the Mining Outpost, and promptly gibbed a clown next to you? Edit: Forgot to add a point to this. From my experience, Tony has been a relatively nice character to RP with, and has a good grasp on the server rules and what is right and wrong to do. I'd be perfectly happy to support a whitelist.

I'm all in favour of this not being classed as antag knowledge/metagaming. It's merely a way to further RP in cases, which is the primary reason this topic was brought. up. If worshipping something like this leads to more RP that is enjoyable - which it probably would - then I am all for it, and always will be.

qq I sozzy ;_; Ran out of time to do this tonight, don't see much time in future to do anything, what with college and dates and stuff. I'll keep this for reference if I find the time.

I'm sure we had shrapnel at one point from explosions and gunshots. It was the worst time.

I literally have no idea how Roll20 works, so we'll run this over an IRC or Skype. Any preference as to which? Also, are people available tomorrow to do this?

I'd be happy enough to give this support. Can you explain some basic characteristics of the Unathi?

Since High Fantasy seems to be a relatively agreed on theme, we'll stick to that. Feel free to write up characters in any way you want. They'll only really be for cosmetic detail, since we're working on dicerolls with no stat modifiers or anything, so feel free.

11/10

Sue wins, gg, thread over.

I'm assuming nobody has preference for setting, then? Uh. Making characters will be a thing when we've set on a setting.

If I recall, a garrote has a knot in it, designed to crush the windpipe and pretty much wreck the target from the offset. Also, suicide vests used to exit within the code - I believe the icon is still there, but not the useability - and involved strapping an assembled bomb to the vest with a signaller in hand.

Had a chat with him earlier today. He has the idea of how a staff member should act, as well as being polite and well-thought, key traits that I would look for in a candidate. I feel that the answers in this thread could have been shorter and more concise, but I feel that they get the point across. This has my +1.

Since I'm now free at weekends, I was thinking about running a few Pen and Paper roleplay sessions, akin to Dungeons and Dragons, but a lot simpler. I'll be running off a D8 system, with 1-2 being a critical fail, 3-4 being a fail, 5-6 being a success, and 7-8 being a critical success. I'd be happy to either run this on Skype or an IRC channel. I called for a quick check on how many people would be up for this on the server, and I've posted this thread here to organise it. Post if you would want to come along! Also, if you have any preference, pick a setting and I'll run a story based on the setting that has the majority vote!

Make a comic based around the origins of Aurora!

The question which was called 'too fluffy' and 'something from a 7th Grade RE class' was 'What can you bring to the table for the team?'.

As to the above comment; If I was a lesbian, and said so and was proud of it, people would respect me. If I was black, and said I was proud to be black, people would respect me. If I said I was proud to be a white male, I would receive some amount of hate because I'm not a minority, so can't be proud of what I am.

After asking the applicant some questions about her answers, I feel that I cannot support the applicant at this time. She showed some promise in her attitude, being willing to assist those who need it to improve, and dealing with those who are not cooperative, but also did not answer questions posed to her due to being too 'fluffy'. If I see an improvement in future in her attitude towards questions, and her ability to work in a team, I am willing to chance my support on this matter.

After asking the applicant some questions about his answers, I am more than willing to lend my support to this application. He has shown himself to be polite, thoughtful, and knowledgeable of how a member of staff should behave within the team and outside of it.

Did I hear a call for some Martial Law rounds?

Shreksuality here. Toot toot, all aboard the Nasus train to Carriesville.

The one in the middle. Because bump.

Cool your jets. I think we all knew what I meant by a trial, and if you'd read properly, I said they weren't guaranteed to happen. Now, back to the topic at hand, instead of attempting to browbeat me. Did Security, at any point, take note of your injuries? Would it be possible to get any of the Security force who were online at the time to post their side?

Can you say how badly you were injured? Security should be of a higher standard than this, seeing as to how they are supposed to interact with a crew. As for a trial, in Space Law, it is left to the choice of the Security force at the time to determine if they have the required manpower and time.

Apologies if this seems out of order in any way Ffrances, but that's exactly what I mean. I feel like my point there was not listened to in favour of taking a defensive stance. Nasir took a player out the round for what would have been an extremely long period of time due to the injuries given, however due to the escape shuttle being in progress, noneof the surgery was carried out. If a player beat someone to critical, breaking numerous bones and taking them out of the round for an extended period because they slipped him on a banana peel, how would we react? In this case, the window throwing should not have happened, as it sparked off the whole encounter. Who in their right mind would slip on a banana peel, then go over to the person ho did it and smash a window with their face? Again, how would we react if we messaged a player about this, and their reasoning was 'He slipped me on a banana peel'? Mocheeze's character was thrown into a window which smashed. The character in question may have just been a messy character, or something to those lines. Not having read about the character, I do not know. Everyone agreeing with his actions does not stop me from disagreeing with them. Nasir started this incident with the window-throw in my opinion, and turned away from roleplay in favour of beating someone near to death, picking it back up when it stopped, alongside the previous reasoning. You can't just say that he got what he deserved because he was part of it, because that's not how things should work. Alright, here's the questions I asked Mocheeze, and the answers he provided, from his point of view:

Staff should be held to higher account than players, due to the position held. Staff should always be well-mannered and polite OOCly, and should refrain from doing things which could be counted as grief. If Nightmare did indeed throw the botanist into the glass and smash it at the beginning of the fight, then he should be counted as the instigator and dealt with as such. Alongside this, remember that clawing attacks deal extra damage, and that the botanist was severely wounded, possibly in a way to disrupt their round, without real cause. There is no real excuse for acting like this. We ban players for doing things like this. Administrators should not be treated any differently. Personally, I'll see if I can grab Mocheeze at some point and ask him what happened from his view (Unless I've missed his post here), amd bring it back to this discussion. A final note. From my perspective, Ffrances, you appear to be defending Nasir's actions unconditionally. Try ro look from the perspective of the other side. Also, Nightmare. You're held in high regard in a high position on this server. Act like it. If anyone has any individual concerns that they are unhappy to voice in this thread for worry of being shot down or bandwagoned against, message a staff member who is not involved in this discussion and they will bring it to this thread.