UnknownMurder Posted June 4, 2020 Posted June 4, 2020 I think we all can agree that this needs to be changed. It contains "head revolutionaries" thing that's been changed by @Chada1. I'm not going to ask for a major overhaul and create headache for everyone. SURRENDER - Should remain as is. RE-EDUCATION - Re-education should be tossed out. Revolutionary via Loyalty vs. Revolutionaries is no longer a thing. Unless, if we do want to re-introduce loyalty implants? I'm all for it. COOPERATION WITH PROSECUTION OR SECURITY - The benefit and description should be tweaked to not include "head revolutionaries". Suggested Description: Being helpful to the members of security, revealing things during questioning or providing names of involved personnel. Suggested Benefit #1: Up to -25%. In the case of revealing a high value target, up to -50%. Suggested Benefit #2: Up to -25%. IMMEDIATE THREAT TO THE PRISONER - Should remain as is. MEDICAL REASONS - Should remain as is. SELF-DEFENSE - Should remain as is.
Pratepresidenten Posted June 5, 2020 Posted June 5, 2020 Never have I ever seen re-education used. Nor does it seem fitting prior to the rebranding. Axe it all. The rest looks pretty solid!
Azande Posted June 6, 2020 Posted June 6, 2020 I think we should add an additional section here stating the Head of Security and Captain may, using their professional discretion and with respect to the importance of regulations, apply reductions to sentences of their own volition without necesarrily granting parole. While this is already implied throughout regulations and the captain's ultimate authority, it would be nice to see it codified.
UnknownMurder Posted June 6, 2020 Author Posted June 6, 2020 1 hour ago, Azande said: I think we should add an additional section here stating the Head of Security and Captain may, using their professional discretion and with respect to the importance of regulations, apply reductions to sentences of their own volition without necesarrily granting parole. While this is already implied throughout regulations and the captain's ultimate authority, it would be nice to see it codified. I am okay with this.
Carver Posted June 7, 2020 Posted June 7, 2020 (edited) I would hope such reductions may never be applied to High Severity Infractions. Edited June 7, 2020 by Carver Since this will inevitably confuse someone, I am referring to Command-related reductions.
Recommended Posts