[Denied] DaBurs Head of Staff Application ²

[DaBurs]

[sLATED FOR REMOVAL]

Edited October 26, 2017 by Guest

[DatBerry]

-1 not a person to trust with a head of staff whitelist in the foreseeable future.

More often than not I see you chucklefucking, most recent incident I witnessed was as a librarian, you went around posting ricky & morty copypasta all over the place.

a check on your notes shows you didn't improve, with more than one incident about lower than standard roleplay.

Even as a more serious character there are still flaws, one incident I've witnessed personally was as a dionae scientist, you shut down a botanist asking for mutagen instantaneously, you did not ask why, nor ask for paperwork, you just said "no" and to top it off you told security he was acting suspicious, never mind the weird human-like suspicion as a dionae, you shut down any cross departmental work that could've happened, not something I enjoy seeing in a head of staff.

Tl;Dr: both as serious and less-than-serious characters your play is sub-par

[DaBurs]

Thank you for citing my 18 day-old warning. Any feedback is appreciated!

[sonicgotnuked]

Thank you for citing my 18 day-old warning. Any feedback is appreciated!

 

This seems like sarcasm. A lot of sarcasm, yeah- I don't think you are ready from what I have seen with you and the points Berry responded. I mean, if you are using sarcasm to justify why you should get the whitelist, you are not really ready.

I suggest responding to the points Berry said and explaining yourself to anything anyone brings up.

[DaBurs]

My last application was denied because literally nobody left any feedback in 6 whole days, I've been actively asking people to leave good or bad feedback on my application since then so when I say I appreciate the feedback it isn't sarcastic. I understand why you might think that, though.

Thanks for the feedback.

[MattAtlas]

My last application was denied because literally nobody left any feedback in 6 whole days, I've been actively asking people to leave good or bad feedback on my application since then so when I say I appreciate the feedback it isn't sarcastic. I understand why you might think that, though.

Thanks for the feedback.

 

Your last application was denied for lack of feedback, but how would opening it again a day after help?

Speaking of. Your earlier reply was very clearly sarcasm ("... thanks for citing my 18 day old warning.") or salt, one of the two. If you really did appreciate the feedback, you'd have left the part about the warning out.

Based on your attitude in responding to DatBerry I don't think you're ready to be a head of staff and I have to agree with sonic here. I also don't see you much in game, I've seen Prismatic a few times before but that was mainly you triggering air sugar grenades in the hallways.

[Ferguson]

acts like a crybaby bitch +1 -2

[Azande]

DaBurs: only crybaby bitchs cry about icky ocky, let the admins handle it themselves

Kyres1: dont you have a headapp burs

DaBurs: yeah want a link

Kyres1: nah i was just saying that calling everyone crybaby bitches probably isnt the best way to get it through ._.

DaBurs: I didnt call everyone crybaby bitches

DaBurs: just people who cry about icky ocky

Echotango23: we are crybaby bitches tho

Presidential: u guys are banned for IC in OOC

Voyd2000: Banhe

JFerguson: no ples don ban i am good boy

JFerguson: if u give madmin i can be goo boy no icking in ocking

Menown: no

NursieKitty: protip insulting people in ooc is a real quick way to get a mute

^^^^^

-1 : self explanatory

[Conspiir]

Only experience I had with Prismatic gave off a particular "greytide" vibe. Like. Extinguisher-ing down the hall in a wheelchair feeling. It felt absurd more than anything. I can't say I've met any of your other characters for any substantial amount of time, sorry. But I hope this criticism helps you aim your roleplay in a more serious direction if you really want this whitelist. I think this one is going to be denied, but I hope when you apply in the future I can eat my words.

-1

[Scheveningen]

What Xander said. That conduct is inappropriate and good OOC attitudes are what we look for in potential and existing whitelistees. There is a serious lack of disrespect you seem to hold against people who hold an opinion in terms of upholding what the actual rules are and how we enforce them. Especially one of the most important ones. It's degrading and belittling.

Furthermore, you copypasted your previous denied application from a day ago. This shows little actual effort in being more convincing or caring to put actual needed substance instead of chunks of paragraphs into your application. Little effort displayed = little displayed amount of caring brought to the table, if you're wondering how the two were connected.

Kind of disappointing, especially since you put so much effort into trying to convince me you deserved the antagonist unban, and I am feeling that was not probably wise considering how quickly you flopped back into the same kind of behavior we discouraged you to be doing.

Will most likely deny this as soon as the week marker hits. Not seeing good feedback from this.

[Scheveningen]

...OK, denying, then. Due to the nature of this, exactly one month from now on November 30th is when you're permitted to make another application again. Attempting to override this before the slated time period will not only result in its immediate denial but also push the date further up another week.