UnknownMurder

What if someone is a Head of Security and wants to bring about a change whilst following the red tapes system and such? What if I want to play as HoS on the Rev's side? Also, ERT members don't have loyalty implants. I checked. Carver said it was "flawed train through". I want to be HoS and help the Revolution. EDIT: Two loyal head staffs. Basically, mutiny.

That was a joke... Right?

+1 Good man. Knows his stuff. I believe he hardly has broken the rules. Doesn't usually get into fights with people rather compromise. Rick. Just get accepted and stop advertising.

The HoP usually doesn't seem to do a huge amount of assignments or reassignments nowadays. Nothing stopping him from letting people who want it to become Cadets have a reassignment is there? Isn't the Head of Security stopping the Head of Personnel because 'We have too many Security. Stap. Stap. Don't do it again without talking to me.'.

Hm. My post didn't go through last night. I remember this, you requested me to join The Company with no roleplay (UM's Ex. Heil NanoTrasen) and I accidentally clicked yes. Eventually, I asked for admin to drop me out of the loyalty and joined the revolution to meet the issues if I remember right; discrimination on Aliens and too many Sec. Bots (Beepsky is fine). You're right, they are loyal to the NanoTrasen. The Implanted Loyalty personnel should not always have to join "The Company" and can join the revolution. For example, if I was the Head of Security, I would be following orders, remaining loyal to NanoTrasen, and wanting to make about peaceful change to the NanoTrasen. Hell, he could even arrest his own revolution buddies because they went too far and gotten too violent.

I yearn for a Security whitelist; I really fucking do. However, that's been shot down routinely. I also support a Security Whitelist. I've already seen Security in interrogation room beating the prisoner and reported to staffs. They haven't told me the verdict or what happened with the player.

No response? Well okay then. -1 If my body tells me if I'm not hungry, I'm not hungry otherwise I puke and I have great dissatisfaction to seeing people making mess on floor.

I heard someone wanted opinions, this is my opinion. If we're going to talk about trusts. I trust recently unbanned players to remain players, attached fishing line/strings, where staffs with scissors can watch them and cut the string anytime.

See Delta's post. http://forums.aurorastation.org/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=6289&p=62735&sid=4f23c56470d6ec1bd7fe97245aabc196#p62735 I figured this thread and post was relevant. A player left because of toxicity in OOC and it wasn't like the 'old times'. I've experienced a little of the 'old times'.

Thank you.

Bye, Tishina. Bye, Mikalhvi

We're changing map soon. Unknown date.

I'm going to be honest. This makes perfect sense.

Well, good question. The easiest thing would be to add the 30 rounds to everyone who has joined the server before a specific date. You and I would be eligible, Mofo anyhow.

I'd be fine with us. Format is just basically, fill in the blanks. Not tell me a story in your records.

I wouldn't mind as long as everyone had the same records format.

I'm entertained myself by how Delta was so accurate, just sitting over here on the sidelines. I'm not being sarcastic.

I must agree with Nanako that is not extreme m however I have a concurrent opinion. The NanoTrasen assets involves the crew's lives but... The station is on the risk, threatened, or actively being destructed and the costs or station cannot be refunded. The Emergency Shuttle and let the station die with a loss of the engine, terrorists killing/bombing, and such. Otherwise, it would shortly appear to be extreme to fight back and hold onto the collapsing station which we all know where this is going to go. I would believe that the Emergency Shuttle is more important and shuttle be regarded as a priority to save the crew rather ERT.

Forgive me, I had not noticed.

Did I mention in my suggestion about company assets? I don't think I did. Let me check my suggestion. Yes, I didn't. Loyalty to NanoTrasen can be interpreted in many ways.

In my own opinion, I do not believe the Loyalty Implants should only make you LOYAL to the NanoTrasen but should have other 'attachments' to the Loyalty Implant. Like an AI's Directive Laws. Henceforth, Loyalty Implants Directive Laws. I propose the following Loyalty Implants Directive Laws in Order: 1. You will remain loyal to the NanoTrasen. 2. You will preserve your own life and the crew's lives. (That way, no Loyalty Implants will, "Fuck that Crew Member. He's expendable." Something along the lines. I can't think of ones. I'll let you guys brainstorm.

Question: What about the dionaes riding on the cargo tug or Odysseus as a faster way to transport or to get around quickly? I've seen a Medical (CMO?) Dionae using Odysseus as a way to get around the areas during non-emergencies, I've reported this to the staffs twice and they seemed to have 'shrugged' it off and jotted notes down. What then? Report it to you for you to strip their whitelist?

Why does Goat Simulator even exist? Why does the DLC have Star Wars font? I wish they didn't make this game.

By the way... You've mentioned to arrest a briefing chemist. Leave that stuff to the admins. Also, Security having basic access? I've been Head of Security and Captain and I will say this. Departments don't like when a department intervenes in another department's business You haven't said a clear reason except TL;DR from what I am seeing is "Criminals is hiding behind department door safely! In order to catch them, we need basic access." No, you don't. You need the AI, don't tell me the AI is a bad player or other excuses regarding the AI. You have the AI. AI is your friend. As someone said... Has no one bothered to talk to Head of Personnel? Head of Security? The Captain? Making a suggestion with no attempt in roleplay? That is silly. From looks of it, no one seems to like the idea.

Quick, what are the ingredient?