Jump to content

Player / Character Complaint (At Discretion) - Kappa / Gunnar Tyrann


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

BYOND Key: JupiterStorm / Jupiter Storm#4324 (Discord)

Game ID: Not known, I was informed by Skull that the bot didn't save the Game ID for this particular round, but it happened just before bZS-auX3. Hope that helps.

Player Byond Key: @Kappa (actual Byond Key not known, might be the same?)

Staff involved: Staff not involved.

Reason for complaint: I have several incidents in mind but only one which I witnessed first hand. I will order them chronologically but of course the first will have actual detail - the others will solely be supporting evidence which other players may or may not wish to comment on themselves having seen more of it. The Quartermaster referenced here throughout is Gunnar Tyrann - the player being Kappa.

#1 - For context, the actions mentioned here probably occurred for reasons likely relating to an issue for which an incident report was filed against Gideon Mayfield - which is fair shake, to be honest, the character has a propensity to be argumentative and rude purely for the sake of it; not exactly a unique trait for someone who stands among the caste of Shaft Miners! It was only a matter of time before he got IR'd (again). What I don't think is fair or reasonable roleplay, is what happened after that.

The round in question was A.I. Malfunction, and Jester, the A.I., had escalated their gimmick to Code Delta - which clearly announces for all the crew to hear that the station's Self-Destruct Mechanism has been armed. Gideon Mayfield pointed out to the Cargo Channel that he was going to find a way to escape, since when using his meson scanners while exploring on the surface level, he happened to notice a conveniently-placed set of Escape Pods just above Command. He mentioned that he had a spare Passenger Seat in his APLU, and that if they didn't make it then some protection would be better than none. ( We have no idea ICly that the nature of the self-destruct is Nuclear and that nothing could feasibly survive it. )

Jesse Johnson, played by @FreshRefreshments, a Cargo Technician who had been backing up Mayfield in the earlier arguments, clearly was the sort of character who wanted to live very much - a fairly reasonable viewpoint, I think. They jumped at the opportunity to get off the station before it exploded. An Escape Shuttle had already been called, and recalled, so it was clear drastic escape measures were necessary. It's important to note that both myself and FreshRefreshments were not engaging in any form of hero activity, nor were we intending to take revenge on anyone. Our sole instinct and roleplay was survival and escape. Which I think is extremely realistic, even if it means leaving other crew behind - we're not exactly family, or attached to them, are we?

Upon hearing Jesse Johnson's intention to escape the station, Gunnar Tyrann appeared to have a flash of truly heroic inspiration at the dire events taking place. In true Communist Cargonia fashion, he took upon himself the role of ad-hoc Commissar of the Cargo Department, advocating that all the crew were going to go down with their ship and refuse to abandon the Captain (who he had just met - at least as far as I know. I could very well be wrong. It's possible they knew each other from before but I don't think so, since this is a new Quartermaster that I've never seen before). The Quartermaster produced a shovel and stood by the airlock leading into Mining, stating the Jesse was not allowed to leave. Both Gideon and Jesse insisted to the Quartermaster that his actions were going to kill all of them, and that all they wanted to do was escape - because Civilian Crew are not heroes or war-veterans. At least... Oh wait, maybe they are. But ours aren't!

Mayfield at this point, stated to the Jesse that they could just sidle around the Quartermaster, that he wasn't going to kill them for trying to escape, because that's absolutely ridiculous, this man was a stickler for regulations and respect! There's no way he could possibly become unhinged and just brutally assault a Cargo Technician who had never wronged him in any way, simply for wanting to save themselves? Oh how wrong I was. As Jesse came towards Gunnar, he started attacking Jesse with the shovel, and several other crew became involved, attempting to restrain the Quartermaster (I think Ornias OOCly and whoever is the player of Berko Mutema). Eventually, the situation dissipated, but not before Jesse's skull had been cracked open from being relentlessly beaten over the head with a shovel, just like the poor Apes in 2001: A Space Odyssey.

Mayfield was also attacked while trying to pull Jesse to safety, but got out of it okay because of his hardsuit. By the end of the confrontation, both Jesse and Gunnar were pretty beat up - Jesse could not move very much for fear of disturbing their skull. But Gunnar, with broken bones, still found the time to pick up a Kinetic Accelerator and stood in the way of the airlock (I don't have logs for this part because the taking of the gun and the firing of it did not produce any since it was malfunctioning). He attempted to fire the weapon at Mayfield for essentially ignoring him when he said they weren't leaving, and the Accelerator harmlessly clicked. Gunnar then staggered back inside, demanding medical attention. At this point, with Jesse's head having been patched over somewhat, Jesse still decided they wanted to leave before the station exploded, so Mayfield helped them into a voidsuit and they headed for the airlock.

Gunnar, seeing this, ABANDONED his own Medical treatment, and tried to stop them. Mayfield and Jesse pushed him out of the airlock and forced the hatch closed. They then cycled the airlock and made their way outside to escape, while Tyrann screamed for Security to handle two crewmembers sensibly jumping ship during Code Delta, failing to take into account that Security were probably very busy addressing the cause of said Code Delta. We made it off-station rather neatly, and that was that.

The logs are as follows, showing the unprovoked assault and following struggle. I tried to salvage what logs I could but it was pretty messy.

Part 1  |  Part 2  |  Part 3  |  Part 4  |  Part 5

Fun fact to note, FreshRefreshments and myself were accused of being meta friends as well due to trying to escape together. I've never really interacted with Fresh much before, and Jesse + Mayfield had never met prior. We were just both selfish crewmembers with a desire to escape with our lives.

#2 - As supporting evidence, a situation following this that I heard about, in the same round, was Gunnar Tyrann not only refusing to evacuate, himself, with the rest of the crew when a Transfer Shuttle was finally accepted by the A.I., but he took it upon himself for whatever reason, to approach the A.I. core on his own, with no backup, in order to 'rescue' the Captain, Nathan Corvo, who had been Borgified. This, bearing in mind that the Security and Engineering team assaulting the core had already been cleanly dispatched. This again, to me, doesn't seem like very realistic and reasonable behaviour for a civilian member of crew. A lot of people saw this and it was the catalyst for a rather amusing discussion in OOC chat at the round end.

#3 - On the round immediately following this one, the Quartermaster once again demonstrated his natural talent for leadership that would make Alexander the Great truly jealous. Upon reprimanding Hal Cohle, played by @Rosetango(?) I think, for not being able to read Tau Ceti Basic, and Hal Cohle quite reasonably thinking this was stupid and deciding to continue with mining anyway... As Cohle continued with going outside, mining materials and delivering them, from what I heard they were attacked by the Quartermaster with a firearm (entirely un-antag related) and had a 'bounty' placed on their head by the Quartermaster, demanding their apprehension by non-Security personnel after Security deemed the issue to be far too stupid to warrant their attention.

I did not actually witness the event, but if anybody else has anything further to add it would be quite helpful.

#Summary - I think that this collective of issues and situations are honestly quite ridiculous in terms of roleplay (EDIT: When applied to a character who is supposed to be in a position of responsibility, for clarification), the Quartermaster's actions that they chose to take do not in any way make sense to the mind of the reasonable, level-headed and strict protagonist that I think the player is trying to portray them as. I've seen far too many new Quartermasters come into Cargo lately, all of them being some kind of honour-bound Solarian ex-military space warrior who try to 'change' the Cargo Department for the 'better', without realizing that the reason nobody takes them very seriously is because, their roleplay simply does not allow them to be taken very seriously. And that their character comes into conflict with other characters - not because of the characters, who get on perfectly fine with absolutely every other superior they have, but because of their own character's failings. If nothing else, I hope this complaint serves as a suggestion for improvement.

Peace out!

Did you attempt to adminhelp the issue at the time? If so, what was the known action taken by administration/moderation? No, at the time the issue was just an isolated case, not to mention I was not the person on the receiving end of this particular incident and Fresh seemed happy to continue the round anyway. It was only after I saw the results even later in the round, and saw another similar incident involving the same Quartermaster on a following round whereby I figured this couldn't have been an issue solely related to confusion or panic and was clearly a recurring character flaw. I also needed to sleep after playing one more round and I thought I would wake up in the morning and approach this with fresh eyes!

Approximate Date/Time:

Date - 21/04/2019

Time: ~ 02:10 - 03:08 GMT

Edited by Jupiter Storm
Posted (edited)

Hello.

First of all, I would like to clarify if this is a character complaint (against Gunnar) or a player complaint against me. This is kind of important. I will defend from the OOC part, if you wish to speak about IC issues, create an IR. Don't mix IC and OOC, that's one of the most basic rules.

 

First of all I thought about making a player complaint against you for self-antagging. You out of nowhere, without a reason, decided to start acting like that. Refusing to fill yield declarations, refusing to follow Captain orders, Calling the company a shit. I read a lot of ''funny'' sarcasm in this complaint, talking about a ''typical thematic veteran QM'' (which has nothing to do with Gunnar) or something, when you are playing another topic ''bad boy miner who refuses to follow any rule''. I hope admins take into account this kind of language and expressions in your complaint.

Next thing, you are not posting the logs of all the conversation through the radio, which I hope the admins try to get to see the context.

Now, finally starting my defense after saying these things. 

#1 First let's talk about the context. My character, Gunnar, had been pulled to his limit during all the shift. A Shaft Miner playing with him and calling him names, all kind of things over the radio, insulting him. And the CT was backing Gideon without a reason. I really love the amount of ''acceptable roleplay'' you displayed during the lenght of the round, just cause you both knew that, usually, there are no consequences for doing that kind of things. You just troll avoiding all kind of responsability roleplay and hide it behind ''my character doesn't care''. 

You  were a CRIMINAL, and my character, Gunnar, was actually trying to protect Jesse, an immature CT who was wearing a gasmask all the shift without a reason (gas masks are quite uncomfortable, but she said she looked better in it) from herself, and from going away with a criminal. A criminal who threatened to make a damn hole in my chest with a thermal drill. That's very realistic for a simple miner to drill through people, right? I also love how people always dodge any kind of fear roleplay. You have your Quartermaster, who by description is quite big, with a shovel, on the door, and you go straight to push him even if you are just a simple immature CT. In fact, when she came to push me, I hit her with the shovel. I didn't want to break her skull, break anything at all, I was just trying to intimidate her, but it seems that fear RP is non-existent. It's 2461, a couple of shovel hits are nothing to medication.

My character, Gunnar, acted, as you can see, in a very difficult situation (situation he is not trained to handle), being threatened by a miner with a thermal drill (it seems that nowadays killing is a simple thing, everyone can do it, without any kind of psychological issue), after he was pulled to his psychological limit during all the shift.

In the end you broke into command and got out in pods, ignoring any kind of roleplay. It's great how you go through the rounds walking on self-antagging limit.

 

#2 I don't know where you got that information from, but that's totally incorrect, lol. The only correct thing is that I left the shuttle when I knew Corvo was borgified. Then, a cyborg (Corvo) captured me (baton + cuff) and pulled me to the IA core where I was borgified. I didn't approach any core or did anything, this is totally false. Wtf.

 

#3 This happened in a different round, different things, do not make two complaints in one, also this is IC. Totally IC. Do not mix OOC and IC. Do not mix character and player. Thank you. 

 

#Summary: You are not a player to judge characters when you have Gideon who is a total topic and would have been fired years ago in any company, not to talk about working on a billions-worth station. You have been mixing IC and OOC in this complaint, and mixing two rounds to make me look worse than I am, creating a chaos regarding all the things that happened. Also, you decided to state that I did something I didn't to make me look like the most horrible player or something (all the #2).

Edited by Kappa
Posted
3 hours ago, Kappa said:

if you wish to speak about IC issues, create an IR. Don't mix IC and OOC, that's one of the most basic rules.

I may have worded the complaint quite badly, but this post is not pertaining to IC issues, the complaint is purely regarding the roleplay of Gunnar! An incident report is not possible because the station's self-destruct mechanism being enabled is not canon, therefore CCIA might be a little bit confused as to why two members of Cargo were panicking and attempting to flee the station in fear of their lives! But you are absolutely correct, if I were able to handle this with an Incident Report, I would have gladly done so!

 

3 hours ago, Kappa said:

Refusing to fill yield declarations, refusing to follow Captain orders, Calling the company a shit.

A little bit false on the first part, but this isn't relevant to the complaint and will be addressed in-character through the CCIA channels, fear not! They're very good at what they do and as I stated, I have no issues with it, it's been a long time coming and a lot of miners deserve Incident Reports for what they do, that is an IC issue being addressed through the IC channels and I welcome it. ^_^

 

3 hours ago, Kappa said:

Next thing, you are not posting the logs of all the conversation through the radio, which I hope the admins try to get to see the context.

Again this isn't relevant to the character complaint, sadly, as the focus of the complaint is what happened following what I mentioned was a perfectly acceptable chain of events that my character entirely deserved. The part where the roleplay comes into question is where your character seems to take a U-turn between a logical, strict, law-abiding individual, into a burly brute with a shovel who mashes a Cargo Technician over the skull for attempting to flee a self-detonating station.

 

3 hours ago, Kappa said:

And the CT was backing Gideon without a reason. I really love the amount of ''acceptable roleplay'' you displayed during the lenght of the round, just cause you both knew that, usually, there are no consequences for doing that kind of things.

Not at all, my dude! If you look at the kind of character that Jesse Johnson is, they are from the Twins which is a part of Eridani space where the working class are renowned for absolutely despising authority figures due to the conditions in which they lived and worked at the time. Both myself and FreshRefreshments (based on what I saw of their roleplay) are very, very seasoned writers, and are happy to welcome any and all consequences that crop up as a result of the character types we play. The fact that something doesn't get done about it usually isn't something that we actively prepare for, it's something that we embrace and welcome because it's what the characters are there to inspire.

 

3 hours ago, Kappa said:

You  were a CRIMINAL

Not me, Mayfield. ^_^ There is no need for the strong emphasis, as I know that everybody handling the Incident Report will clearly see that Mayfield had breached regulations.

 

3 hours ago, Kappa said:

A criminal who threatened to make a damn hole in my chest with a thermal drill. That's very realistic for a simple miner to drill through people, right?

Can you please cite the specific circumstance and provide logs in favour of an unrealistic response? Because as far as I recall the mention of a thermal drill followed as a result of Gunnar attempting to force two members of crew to stay on a self-destructing station (which will end in the guaranteed death of all crew present) with hostile force of his own - first, before the threat was issued. I did not include this in my logs as it was not relevant to the complaint against -your- character, which is what this post is about.

 

3 hours ago, Kappa said:

In fact, when she came to push me, I hit her with the shovel. I didn't want to break her skull, break anything at all, I was just trying to intimidate her, but it seems that fear RP is non-existent.

I'm sorry dude, this is false. The logs demonstrate no attempt made to push the Quartermaster prior to him battering her skull. Based on the behaviour that your Quartermaster had exhibited earlier in the round, both characters were able to reasonably conclude that he would not resort to potentially-lethal force (which head injuries very much can be, as it only takes two or three hits with a heavy implement to actually break bone) over a member of crew attempting to flee Code Delta in order to save their own life. Because an unprovoked attack on a Cargo Technician would be very much against regulations, and disrespectful, which Gunnar seemed to be a stickler for. If Gunnar had attacked Mayfield for absolutely no reason other than to get his own back, we wouldn't be having this discussion, my man.

 

3 hours ago, Kappa said:

In the end you broke into command and got out in pods, ignoring any kind of roleplay. It's great how you go through the rounds walking on self-antagging limit.

In a Code Delta situation where the station is about to self-destruct, attempting to escape by breaking into escape pods is an exceptionally logical choice. We can't roleplay with walls or windows, man! We really tried, we did, but they didn't say anything back to us. u_u

 

3 hours ago, Kappa said:

Totally IC. Do not mix OOC and IC. Do not mix character and player.

Thankfully this is not an OOC attack on your person, so I apologise if there is a misunderstanding here somewhere. The topic in question is the responses to various situations that don't correlate with what you're attempting to portray in the way you seem to usually play the character. Situation #3, as mentioned in the introduction to my post, is not the incident in question, merely supporting evidence suggesting why I felt that this was not a one-off, isolated problem, and was clearly an inherent character flaw that could use some improvement. Everything that happens in a round is Totally IC. The issue here is the validity of what ICly happens versus how a person would feasibly treat someone or respond to them.

In your instance, for Gunnar, you've chosen to portray them as someone who is a stickler for regulations and is very quick to open the rulebook and go through the official channels, relying on rank structure and official standing in order to solve a problem. And that's great! That's how an authority figure should be - particularly in the Corporate world! Unfortunately attacking crew with shovels and firearms because they do something that Gunnar doesn't want them to do, doesn't match up with this personality set.

 

3 hours ago, Kappa said:

You are not a player to judge characters when you have Gideon who is a total topic and would have been fired years ago in any company, not to talk about working on a billions-worth station.

He has been subject to numerous Incident Reports or workplace disciplinary inquiries and has emerged from each one smelling of roses, because of the type of character he is and how he handles them. I do not choose how these things turn out, that's up to the guys down in CCIA, and that's an in-character issue. He should have been fired and I do not dispute that, but he has not yet been. ^_^ And it's been a very entertaining ride so far.

But the complaint isn't about Mayfield, unfortunately! You are encouraged to make a player complaint about me and Mayfield, however, though it doesn't really seem like there's any point to it considering you've already dealt with that issue correctly through the official channels. I don't want to dwell on my own character but since you brought it up - Gideon (and many other miners AND some scientists, chemists etc who are far, far worse than him) is not held to the same standards of conduct as authority figures. You will note that a Shaft Miner requires no qualifications whatsoever and is in fact, a very dangerous job crewed by some real roughnecks. I'm just slotting into the role, honestly!

 

3 hours ago, Kappa said:

You have been mixing IC and OOC in this complaint

In conclusion, I'm really sorry again if there's been some kind of misunderstanding! But this isn't an OOC attack on you as a person at all, merely on the way that you've chosen to have the character respond to In-Character situations that do not correlate properly with how a person in Gunnar's position, exhibiting the sort of personality traits that he usually does, should actually feasibly respond. That's my sole and only problem, and I'm sure you're a perfectly swell individual otherwise.

As I mentioned in my complaint, I'm not really worried if nothing moderator-heavy comes from this, no warnings, etc, I'm just hoping it'll serve as a prompt for some kind of improvement.

If you feel that I need improvement myself, you should absolutely make a Player / Character complaint, though it seems a bit moot since you've already included it all in this thread here and submitted an Incident Report (which I still think is the right thing to do). Mayfield is a very old character and I've had nothing but positive feedback about him, for both the good and the bad situations. If his presence reduced the quality of a round for other people, I'd definitely take note of that and strive to make it better - or retire the character completely once he's reached the end of his functional life as a source of entertainment and roleplay.

Anyway! That's all from me, I'll be leaving this in the hands of the moderator / admin team from here and hope it doesn't leave any permanent hard feelings.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Jupiter Storm said:

Again this isn't relevant to the character complaint, sadly, as the focus of the complaint is what happened following what I mentioned was a perfectly acceptable chain of events that my character entirely deserved. The part where the roleplay comes into question is where your character seems to take a U-turn between a logical, strict, law-abiding individual, into a burly brute with a shovel who mashes a Cargo Technician over the skull for attempting to flee a self-detonating station

Those logs are really important cause it shows the escalation of the issue, and how my character could have periodically gone out of his mind and lost control of the situation. The context is always very important.

14 minutes ago, Jupiter Storm said:

I did not include this in my logs as it was not relevant to the complaint against -your- character, which is what this post is about.

8 minutes ago, Jupiter Storm said:

Not at all, my dude! If you look at the kind of character that Jesse Johnson is, they are from the Twins which is a part of Eridani space where the working class are renowned for absolutely despising authority figures due to the conditions in which they lived and worked at the time. Both myself and FreshRefreshments (based on what I saw of their roleplay) are very, very seasoned writers, and are happy to welcome any and all consequences that crop up as a result of the character types we play. The fact that something doesn't get done about it usually isn't something that we actively prepare for, it's something that we embrace and welcome because it's what the characters are there to inspire.

Still, fleeing with a criminal who is being searched and for sure will be arrested, and fleeing in command pods that could be gunned down due to unauthorized launch is not realistic.

8 minutes ago, Jupiter Storm said:

Not me, Mayfield. ^_^ There is no need for the strong emphasis, as I know that everybody handling the Incident Report will clearly see that Mayfield had breached regulations.

Still, it's important to remark that Mayfield is a criminal to see how unrealistic it is the fact that Jesse decided to flee with him if you never had interactions before. 

 

10 minutes ago, Jupiter Storm said:

Can you please cite the specific circumstance and provide logs in favour of an unrealistic response? Because as far as I recall the mention of a thermal drill followed as a result of Gunnar attempting to force two members of crew to stay on a self-destructing station (which will end in the guaranteed death of all crew present) with hostile force of his own - first, before the threat was issued. I did not include this in my logs as it was not relevant to the complaint against -your- character, which is what this post is about.

I'm sure there's a reason you didn't post those logs :). You made that threat to pierce a hole with a thermal drill through a human being prior to any other action. It's unrealistic, you take life and death like nothing just because it is a game, but you can't just kill someone in real life piercing a hole through their chest like in Dragonball without being a psycopath. It's important to let everyone know your threats to understand the behaviour of my character my dude. I wasn't playing alone, you were there, Jesse was there. What my character did is nothing but the reactions to your movements 

12 minutes ago, Jupiter Storm said:

'm sorry dude, this is false. The logs demonstrate no attempt made to push the Quartermaster prior to him battering her skull.

It was not pushing like push intent + click but shoving me moving against my character.

15 minutes ago, Jupiter Storm said:

In a Code Delta situation where the station is about to self-destruct, attempting to escape by breaking into escape pods is an exceptionally logical choice. We can't roleplay with walls or windows, man! We really tried, we did, but they didn't say anything back to us. u_u

It is not unless you are a criminal, Jupiter. Command Pods are pods for command, I bet that as the good writer you are you can probably understand this. I've also been told mutlitple times that those pods can be gunned down if a unauthorized launch is detected. I love the amount of sarcasm and linguistic demagogy you apply when writing.

17 minutes ago, Jupiter Storm said:

he topic in question is the responses to various situations that don't correlate with what you're attempting to portray in the way you seem to usually play the character.

Is that your issue with me and you want to give an advice instead of having me punished you could talk to me through Discord, like I usually do towards other players if my will is to help them improve instead of trying to get them punished, I get this is not the case.

 

19 minutes ago, Jupiter Storm said:

Unfortunately attacking crew with shovels and firearms because they do something that Gunnar doesn't want them to do, doesn't match up with this personality set.

 

You can see it matching up when you add the context you have been trying to hide multiple times ^^ When you place someone who is not as trained as a Head is to handle these situations, and once his life was threatend, and if you knew a bit of his story, you would understand the reaction, but I guess, again, that your will is not to learn, or to help people to improve but to get someone punished. That's the reason you were so interested in learning about Fresh character and not at all interesteed in mine. You don't know a thing about his personality

22 minutes ago, Jupiter Storm said:

But the complaint isn't about Mayfield, unfortunately! You are encouraged to make a player complaint about me and Mayfield,

Your character and you as player are involved in this matter, stop trying to hide the actions you did prior to mine or to mark those as something without importance, the context and what happened to make my character react like that is one of the most important things to investigate.

24 minutes ago, Jupiter Storm said:

As I mentioned in my complaint, I'm not really worried if nothing moderator-heavy comes from this, no warnings, etc, I'm just hoping it'll serve as a prompt for some kind of improvement.

I don't have a reason to let you know about this, but I will, so maybe you can understand why I am going to defend my position until the last consequence. If I get any kind of punishment I will get a permaban without appeal chance. This is why I'm going to defend myself in this complaint like if it were some kind of last stand, and this is why I'm hardly criticizing the way you are expressing yourself (with emoticons and jokes like references to Space Oddysey), maybe this complaint is kind of funny for you, or at least that's what you are showing with this behaviour. It's not funny for me, it's not a game for me.

 

28 minutes ago, Jupiter Storm said:

If you feel that I need improvement myself, you should absolutely make a Player / Character complaint,

If I want to let you know something that I think you could improve, as I said, be sure I won't post a player complaint, I would contact you through Discord to speak about it. Player complaints are OOC, and I don't like to use them if I think there was no malicious intent. That's how I would like people to act towards me, and, even if nobody does it, I will keep doing it.

 

That's all for the moment. Thank you.

Posted

Hello, I am going to be the agent handling the IR side of things, which will be supervised by experienced CCIA members as I am still currently under trial.

In relevance to the IR, I would like to remind you both that issues past the yield report issue and involvement of command crew (Captain) and the CT should not be included in the interviews if they are linked to Malf AI round type.

The player/complaint is an OOC issue, therefore not my area, so please keep that apart from IC issue, which is the IR that we have spoken here. 

Obligatory link: 

If you have any questions, please DM at Soultheif96#2257 on Discord or PM me on here in the forums. Have a good rest of your day. 

Posted

Hi! I was the malfunctioning AI this round and I skimmed the complaint, and I wanted to say a couple things.

 

Firstly, Kappa holds correct that he did not in fact ever go near my core, especially later stage in the round where all my attention was placed to my core, and the people trying to dig straight down in it. Gunner went out of the shuttle to convince Corvo to come with everyone, and it pulled a decent amount of roleplay for Corvo to indeed drag him to my core and toss him into my borg machine. He at the end of the day, got a fate worse then death.

 

Secondly, especially towards the latter parts, I was a psychopathic machine demanding Corvos sacrifice while the self destruct timer is clearly counting down, recalling every shuttle, and throwing all opposition into my borg machine plus describing the brutal process as I made it known that I threw the CE in too. I think regardless, breaking into the bridge to escape death is certainly acceptable, and if the QM decided to try forcing cargo to stay in cargo, then he would of certainly deserved a thermal drill in his chest. 

 

The self destruct was ticking, and no one could stop a psychopathic AI and Corvo was forced to bend to its will: Submit into the machine if everyone wanted to go home.

 

 

Posted

Hi again! So, after speaking to the player in question as per their suggestion, and interacting with them for a few rounds afterwards, I would like to withdraw this character complaint as the issue seems to not be a recurring one and what I felt that they were doing wrong before, they have not continued to do. In general, there is a positive outlook for the future and I don't think it warrants moderator action anymore unless you feel otherwise.

Posted
On 23/04/2019 at 21:18, Jupiter Storm said:

Hi again! So, after speaking to the player in question as per their suggestion, and interacting with them for a few rounds afterwards, I would like to withdraw this character complaint as the issue seems to not be a recurring one and what I felt that they were doing wrong before, they have not continued to do. In general, there is a positive outlook for the future and I don't think it warrants moderator action anymore unless you feel otherwise.

Oki doki.

Complaint archived. 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...