Jump to content

MattAtlas

Head Admins / Devs
  • Posts

    1,645
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by MattAtlas

  1. Should actually be fixed now. Like, for real.
  2. Mirrors deactivated. Try connecting now.
  3. The ban should be lifted. Don't reconnect with a VPN.
  4. Do the ckeys happysir, donutmcgeese, hackerhercules, votonyg, muffindrake, getup1, mrxlink01 mean anything to you?
  5. Have you connected to Aurora from more than one device at all?
  6. Should be fixed. Try joining.
  7. Sure, unbanned. Just remember to read the rules.
  8. This appeal is denied. You have already been permabanned twice and we do not allow more chances than that.
  9. Voting for dismissal. This is going to give people the idea that this surgery should be used outside of cyborgification (which it should not). I don't want to see it used that way nor do I want to deal with it, as it'll be extremely uninteresting if not downright removal from the round without murder (remember CMD and how unfun it was for everyone involved? This is that, but worse).
  10. We are serious, yes. Or at least, we try to be. Most of the time.
  11. This complaint is a bit anemic in information. Could you explain to us exactly: What happened this round that caused the IR? Why exactly do you think the IR was mismanaged?
  12. Application denied. Other than the lack of feedback, I do not believe the character you have chosen is appropriate to be a head of staff, nor that you are ready to play a CMO. If you have questions, you may DM me on Discord: mattatlas#0230
  13. You have absolutely no grounds to call me out on passive aggressiveness on a (not even charged, if I'm being honest) statement like that when you had just accused me of racially profiling you. I didn't even see this LOOC exchange because I was busy with playing the game, RPing with people and handling your ticket. I don't know what you want me to say about an exchange I literally did not know about. You made this statement. This is derailing and nothing more.
  14. I'll address this one by one. I'm not sure on which grounds you can claim that I was "very disrespectful" in the ticket. Here are the full ticket logs: I have not once in this ticket been "disrespectful" towards you, I believe your conduct here speaks for the rest. None of what I said is passive aggressive either - you intentionally tried to derail the ticket, you tried accusing us of "racial profiling" of all things, so yes after you do something like that I am going to get more curt with you. I am more than justified in telling you that if you don't comply with a ruling you'll be banned, since staff actions in-game are final. LOOC chatter was not related to the adminhelp at all. This is conjecture. Let's look at what the wiki says. If you extrapolate, and these are your own words, "implying that Central/West Africans would never name their son Samuel and must follow strict naming rules otherwise they wouldn't be African enough" for this, then I have never in my life seen a more bad faith argument. We do enforce naming rules for certain places (see Gadpathur, for example) because they're colonized by a certain area and we'd like to see that area represented. Our playerbase is 99% Western and thus naturally trends towards making Western characters. Of course this is not a problem, but it'd be a believability issue if you could have John Smith the Eridanian, as I mentioned in your ticket, when Eridani is colonized entirely by CAR/West Africa: thus, we enforce representation of these cultures (through naming/skin complexion). It is possible for someone to theoretically name their child something completely incoherent with where they're from, but that's not what we want represented from that planet. That representation would be really shallow at that point, because everyone would be justified in naming their character "Sam Knight" or whatever other western name. So no, it's not allowed if it doesn't fit the established background of the planet's peoples on the wiki. Edit: After being given some more information in DMs, I am willing to permit the usage of the name Samuel.
  15. Unbanned.
  16. I can unban you, but any repeats of the funny "say/post something nsfw and then delete it" are going to result in an unappealable permaban. Understand?
  17. Seems like a nonissue to me. People will write "chief of security" since they've always fully written "head of security" before in command radio.
  18. Not sure how? People have called the HoS "chief" for ages.
  19. Closed. Not enough feedback.
  20. Make one in the appropriate section.
  21. Two things: 1. Player names will not be accepted and if I see one being put in a PR, I am going to not even give it the time of day. 2. Either this cat replaces Runtime, or it does not get added, non-negotiable.
  22. If you disagree with a ban, you should post a staff complaint. Unban requests are for when you understand you were banned and agree with the reason why.
  23. Apologies, this slipped through the cracks. I understand that March and April were low activity months due to the NBT, so I will give this an extra week. Please acquire some feedback.
  24. I will have to deny this application for a number of reasons. Primarily the lack of feedback, but I also have some concerns about your roleplay quality. Things like spelling, writing and grasp on the English language are fairly fundamental elements of roleplay even if it may come across as a bit of an overstatement at first. Additionally, as stated on the guidelines, you may not apply with a Consular character for the head of staff whitelist. This restrictions includes Liaisons, since it's the same job slot. It may be a bit unclear however, so I will update the guidelines to better reflect this.
×
×
  • Create New...