MattAtlas

Warden uniforms are a bit trickier. Here's the PMCG one: Armor on: I think this one looks fine. Here's the Idris one: The shirt's green here is way, way too overbearing. You need to find a different color or shirt style. Here's the Zavod one: Don't really have any issue with it. Looks fine.

I actually really, really like the new PMCG uniform with this PR. Very sleek. I think the EPMC security officer's uniform (the white shirt/black pants one) is good, but the amount of buttons is a little odd. It should look like a shirt/polo if anything, so with 2-3 buttons at the top instead of all the way down. The alt one looks menacing as fuck. I'm a fan of it. Bonus picture with armor: The Idris alt uniform looks alright, even if a bit niche. It doesn't reeeeaaaaaaally fit the Idris theme of being a sleek banker corporation, this uniform looks a bit detached from that. I think it can be kept in so that people can choose to be particularly LARP as Idris, though. The normal Idris uniform has the same issue as the EPMC uniform. The buttons going all the way down are weird. The Zavodskoi uniforms look alright. This one's the only one I'm unsure of: The black/brown combination may be a bit odd at first, but I think the contrast is growing on me. Other than that, it has the same button spam issue as the other uniforms mentioned above Looks extra good with armor, though : Zavod alt looks good, too. No real complaints about it. Bonus armor pic: All the side sprites look good.

Don't really see why, considering that security can order many other types of game-ending gear from cargo, such as bullpups and the laser sniper rifle, which are both absolutely ridiculous guns. Ions are on the same powerlevel, except much more niche.

Accepted.

While this is cool, this is definitely too farfetched and begs the question of why your character would ever have something like this (which is a gigantic risk) instead of plastic surgery. Unfortunately, this will have to be denied.

Not the hardest thing to code as a lot of the backend necessary is present already (if not all). Balancing is the only issue as acquiring what is essentially a second life for 3TC is a bit... well, questionable.

Unbanned.

To be clear, I think the identification argument is very overblown. Most of the time people look like officers no matter what they wear because of the belts, security-colored backpacks, sunglasses, berets and often boots. You can wear practically anything you'd want and people would still know you're an officer. Secondly, I'm not really opposed to relaxing uniform regulations, but it must come with OOC action if the regulations are flaunted repeatedly (both for heads of staff that ignore enforcement and for players that keep flaunting the regs over and over again). This is because I have no doubt that people would eventually start to toe the line and go over it once the new regs settle in for good (so, after about three weeks to a month). I'd personally say that Security attire should be kept to ankle-length pants, a business casual look and colors must represent your contractor (so, no brown+red slacks for Idris officers). Additionally, I'd probably say that wearing identifying items should be mandatory (see berets, backpacks, boots, the belt, ...). I'm not sure about writing a list of pre-approved items, because it's further adding to the pile of wiki-only almost meme tier lists of random bullshit (like the 'who can do what surgery' chart). In conclusion, I think the best bet is to wait for that other uniform PR that brings in the old uniforms to be merged and see if the situation gets better. If it doesn't, there's a tangible need for change and I think that relaxing the regulation should be considered, but overall my feelings are currently for the status quo with bigger involvement from the Security players' side regarding their uniforms.

Have you been able to get any feedback?

You had a lot of notes about breaking really basic rules. If you hadn't read the rules after all of those notes, warnings and even bans, why would I trust you to keep playing further? "Don't randomly suicide" is one of the most basic rules there is. I'm willing to lift this ban if you agree to reading the rules and playing seriously.

Straight from our rules: Use of proxy-servers can result in a ban or may not be supported. Due to the amount of griefers that use proxy servers in an attempt to bypass punishment, connecting via a dedicated proxy server, VPNs, or routing your connection through a dedicated server host, can result in an immediate permanent ban. It's not a "special rule": if you keep using this VPN, you will happen upon the IP address of someone who is banned, and you'll be banned again. We can't be here doing the song and dance of unbanning people constantly because they use VPNs, so if you get caught in another guy's ban again, that's on you and it won't be lifted. You're unbanned, but keep what I said above in mind.

On trial from 30MAY2022 to 05JUN2022.

Yeah, that's fine. I will remove the warning.

Hello @Clem? Do you agree to the above?

This appeal is denied. Given recent information sent to us, we are not willing to accept your appeal.

Unbanned.

I can lift this ban, but you will need to play without a VPN or else you will just keep getting caught in someone else's ban net.

We are willing to give you another chance since you have only one permaban, but any sort of caricature or anything like that and you will be banned without appeal. Understand?

This was lifted like ages ago, by the way.

Have you played on any other server than Aurora?

https://github.com/Aurorastation/Aurora.3/pull/13974 As per this PR, this application is denied.

I do not see matriarch whitelists as a full fledged command role. It is essentially a ghost role that you use while waiting for a respawn. These are your words. To me, this is paramount to you not wanting to use your command whitelist. I am going to discuss this with the head admins and see if we can unwhitelist matriarch drones instead, as I am not personally interested in accepting an application from someone that explicitly does not want to play full-fledged command roles.

Not really sure about giving someone a command whitelist that they do not intend to use at all. I would rather decouple matriarch drones from the command WL and put them under the AI WL instead.

This is denied due to lacking feedback. I suggest reapplying in a week or two at the very least.

This application is denied. I have witnessed questionable interactions myself and agree with what Owen says. I think you need to work on characterisation more before you get a command whitelist -- most of your characters (especially your Tajara, as that's what I've been observing the last few days) seem to follow the same notes, both appearance-wise and personality-wise, which is not the kind of thing I want to see from command whitelistees.. Additionally, with how you currently portray Nasr, I do not believe she should be promoted to a head of staff position at all.