Arrow768

Closed and archived as requested by the OP.

This application has been un-archived as it was accepted within 30 minutes. This timeframe did not permit the required time for community feedback.

It seems that at this time it is not possible to have a civil discussion about this topic. As such the topic will be locked for the time being until people have cooled down and can express their opinion without accusations of spite PRs, …. I also want to point out that the decision to merge this was a unanimous decision by the maintainers. In addition the admin team will go through this topic and hand out strikes where needed.

You have proposed a solution to a problem I don’t see at the moment. Why is it an issue that you can’t play a specific corp in a specific department. The corps are currently set up to allow every species to play every department.

There are no items with the name "autodrill" or "chiseled rock". There is a "autodrill" variable that is set on a few types of drills/pickaxe, but from what I could see that only effects the way you can mine things (run into it, instead of having to click it).

Boron, Helium and Hydrogen have been added.

Should be available next round under the name "package wrapper" The "old" one has been renamed to "gift wrapping paper"

seconding the vote for dismissal. given the attitudes displayed by some people in this thread its being locked and binned prematurely.

From @Triogenix announcement in the Lore Discord:

Trial completed. Moved to the archive.

Trial completed. Moved to the archive.

Trial completed. Moved to the archive.

This will be implemented in a upcoming PR.

This is being discussed by the headmins/devs, lore masters, maintainers and ccia lead.

Voting for dismissal for the reasons stated above. You only risk loosing your AI / Command whitelist if you get banned. The species whitelists are generally unrelated to bans.

Seconding the vote for dismissal.

I think the way it’s currently set up is fine. The two main goals of project threads is to report progress and/or to gather feedback. With that said I am voting for dismissal unless there is something I missed?

I think it would be preferable to either give them their own small shuttle or provide a closer integration with mining.

Moving this to the general section of the forums as there currently is no policy that is being suggested for implementation. (And the policy suggestions forum is the wrong place for idea gathering)

Voting for dismissal for that reason.

Seconding the vote for dismissal for the above stated reason. And moving it to the rejected policy forum.

The person handling the complaint already has the capability to ask people to keep their posts shower and to the point. Voting for dismissal

Moved to the rejected policy suggestion forum following two votes for dismissal.

This is still on the “implement it eventually list”

Voting for dismissal due to the reasons provided by Garn.