sonicgotnuked Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 I play science and I think Edgar makes a good head of staff as a RD. I don't know what drama happened between chaz and hunter. I know edgar gets promoted to interim a lot and I think he should get it back because he knows how to handle science. For a OOC stance, I am fine with him, I never really seen a bad attitude with him. Mistakes are mistakes, all I would like to say is, try to learn the department before you become a head for it. +1 Link to comment
HunterRS Posted November 27, 2016 Author Share Posted November 27, 2016 I play science and I think Edgar makes a good head of staff as a RD. I don't know what drama happened between chaz and hunter. I know edgar gets promoted to interim a lot and I think he should get it back because he knows how to handle science. For a OOC stance, I am fine with him, I never really seen a bad attitude with him. Mistakes are mistakes, all I would like to say is, try to learn the department before you become a head for it.+1 What my new way of working things is, I'm going to start below then once I feel ready to take head of staff I will, but I will stay in research most of the time Link to comment
Dragonspare Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 Well, to begin, i will take most of my points from an IC point of view, Edgar was an average RD to my chars, not memorable, but still not the worst, he should delegate more and do less, like real bosses do, i like of him that he is still kind of a doof, but he takes it more seriously when he works as RD, making him feel a little more alive, trying to actually force himself to be a little serious as he needs to be, so yeah, my only problem is that Edgar does too much for his own good and his workes get a good deal out of it, that isn't why they have a boss, they have one that should force them to do the jobs they signed for. Lastly, the little part i'm taking as OOC point of view, Hunter jumps straight to thing taking them at hearth, not even considering twice before saying something, there's room for positive improvement there. All and all, Hunter isn't that bad of a head, instead, i think his time as either RD and HoS was rather good, a little missunderstanding got his whitelist stripped and i think, counting the original charge of the strip, it wasn't needed at all, a warning might've got him in the good way back then, but past things aside, even if i FUCKING HATE his CT meme, it's his choice, and i approve him as a head +1 from me! i hope you get it right this time, Hunturd Link to comment
MoondancerPony Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 Right, so, ICly, Hunter's a good scientist. Unfortunately, I don't get the opportunity to RP much with him. He seems to rush to complete everything he can and then either cryo or vote for crew transfer. If you can change that and start RPing more and develop friendships and get to know other characters (and let other characters get to know Edgar), this would be an easy +1. As it stands, however, I don't think I can give an opinion either way. Link to comment
HunterRS Posted November 27, 2016 Author Share Posted November 27, 2016 Right, so, ICly, Hunter's a good scientist. Unfortunately, I don't get the opportunity to RP much with him. He seems to rush to complete everything he can and then either cryo or vote for crew transfer. If you can change that and start RPing more and develop friendships and get to know other characters (and let other characters get to know Edgar), this would be an easy +1. As it stands, however, I don't think I can give an opinion either way. I understand what you mean, and I am trying to work other areas like Xenoarch and get back into Xenobio to make it so I am still in the round instead of sitting there, or sometimes I do Toxins and Tscience. Being someone in Xenobio, they don't really get much RP with other people being so far away. I understand you response. Link to comment
Synnono Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 I don't think I'll be giving a yes or no opinion here. I take it back. Dragonspare and Moondancer brought up something that has bugged me a bit on the OOC side of things. You are always trying to vote to end the round at the earliest opportunity. When I last asked you about this, you'd said that it's basically because you're bored. While no-one's obligated to be thrilled by every round, this is a pattern of behavior so consistent that people are associating it with you as a player. Instead of just leaving my opinion on a bored person trying to force everyone else to stop playing at 'it builds on nothing is and not fun for others,' I'd like to ask you why you get bored and do it. Do you not feel invested in most rounds? What sort of role are you taking in the stories? What do you expect of the people around you, in regards to your own enjoyment? How are you adding to their experience? Will any of that change when you're a Research Director or Head of Security? If so, why? Link to comment
HunterRS Posted November 27, 2016 Author Share Posted November 27, 2016 I don't think I'll be giving a yes or no opinion here. I take it back. Dragonspare and Moondancer brought up something that has bugged me a bit on the OOC side of things. You are always trying to vote to end the round at the earliest opportunity. When I last asked you about this, you'd said that it's basically because you're bored. While no-one's obligated to be thrilled by every round, this is a pattern of behavior so consistent that people are associating it with you as a player. Instead of just leaving my opinion on a bored person trying to force everyone else to stop playing at 'it builds on nothing is and not fun for others,' I'd like to ask you why you get bored and do it. Do you not feel invested in most rounds? What sort of role are you taking in the stories? What do you expect of the people around you, in regards to your own enjoyment? How are you adding to their experience? Will any of that change when you're a Research Director or Head of Security? If so, why? When I meant I am bored, as in I like starting new rounds, it gives me something to do. Have fun, think of something else to work things in RnD, work for something else in Xenobiology. I talked to a few people and they think I am okay with doing it. It's just something I like to do, It started with me doing it discretly, but then people noticed and starting hating on it. Link to comment
sonicgotnuked Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 I don't think I'll be giving a yes or no opinion here. I take it back. Dragonspare and Moondancer brought up something that has bugged me a bit on the OOC side of things. You are always trying to vote to end the round at the earliest opportunity. When I last asked you about this, you'd said that it's basically because you're bored. While no-one's obligated to be thrilled by every round, this is a pattern of behavior so consistent that people are associating it with you as a player. Instead of just leaving my opinion on a bored person trying to force everyone else to stop playing at 'it builds on nothing is and not fun for others,' I'd like to ask you why you get bored and do it. Do you not feel invested in most rounds? What sort of role are you taking in the stories? What do you expect of the people around you, in regards to your own enjoyment? How are you adding to their experience? Will any of that change when you're a Research Director or Head of Security? If so, why? I would honestly disagree with this statement also, there is no rule that I saw stating that you can't vote right when you are able. If people want the round to end, they will vote yes. If not, they will vote no. Link to comment
Synnono Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 I would honestly disagree with this statement also, there is no rule that I saw stating that you can't vote right when you are able. If people want the round to end, they will vote yes. If not, they will vote no. I wasn't pointing it out because there was or wasn't a rule against it. I was pointing it out because to me it indicates a lack of interest in helping to build on and make a round better, which is a thing I think a Head should ideally want to do. Which part are you disagreeing with? And Hunter, any insight for the rest of my questions above? Regardless of whether other people agree or not, they'll inform my opinion of this application. Link to comment
HunterRS Posted November 27, 2016 Author Share Posted November 27, 2016 Instead of just leaving my opinion on a bored person trying to force everyone else to stop playing at 'it builds on nothing is and not fun for others,' I'd like to ask you why you get bored and do it. Do you not feel invested in most rounds? What sort of role are you taking in the stories? What do you expect of the people around you, in regards to your own enjoyment? How are you adding to their experience? Will any of that change when you're a Research Director or Head of Security? If so, why? Do you not feel invested in most rounds? I RP quite a lot during the first hour and a half, and then everyone in Research stops around the 1:30 mark, unless there is an antag, If that case, I normally figure out what the crap they are doing, like their tech and stuff, but most of the time, I don't do Bar RP cause thats not Edgar What sort of role are you taking in the stories? We have had a lot of discussion over Research Radio about how synth rights and stuff, it's a normal everyday talk and stuff, it's all fun What do you expect of the people around you, in regards to your own enjoyment? My Motto, "Have fun and let people relax." If someone gets caught due to one small error on there character thing, I will RP with them and have fun, if they go on a murderous rampage, I will try to RP calming them down. How are you adding to their experience? Again, I have tried to RP them out and have fun, let them have fun, and if they get mad I apologize OOC. This is a game afterall, we aren't suppose to hold grudges. Will any of that change when you're a Research Director or Head of Security? If so, why? Me still doing Crew Transfer has just turned into a meme right now, and I normally do it no matter what, even if i am having fun, cause I like to see if people are having fun or want to leave, it my gauge on if I am doing a good round as an antag/rper. Link to comment
Filthyfrankster Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 You are always trying to vote to end the round at the earliest opportunity. When I last asked you about this, you'd said that it's basically because you're bored. While no-one's obligated to be thrilled by every round, this is a pattern of behavior so consistent that people are associating it with you as a player. The whole 'Votes for a crew transfer at 2 hours' is a completely dumb matter at most, and has no reason to be used as a negative for an application like this. I hate it when people bring this up as a 'this guy is possibly shit'. If it really was an issue, I would be posting logs of every incident that a head of staff player or even a member of staff (Who I can just claim as being lazy/refuses to keep observing the round) @HunterRS I read logs of the day that lead up to your initial whitelist strip, and let me say. It was a total fucking mess, and from what I've seen and been told after asking about, You completely ignored CC orders of 'the guy is fine let him do his gimmick' Despite the gimmick being very snowflakey, You should of simply pulled up your pants and let them do whatever the hell they want due to them most likely having CCIA permission, that you must follow as head of security due to your loyalty implant. If anything also, you should of ahelped every action you were about to take to try and protect yourself from this kind of stuff happening. As for Dawnguard, most my experiences with him was mainly "SLIMES ESCAPED I'M DYING". I'm gonna remain neutral on this matter for now. Link to comment
Synnono Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 The whole 'Votes for a crew transfer at 2 hours' is a completely dumb matter at most, and has no reason to be used as a negative for an application like this. I hate it when people bring this up as a 'this guy is possibly shit'. If it really was an issue, I would be posting logs of every incident that a head of staff player or even a member of staff (Who I can just claim as being lazy/refuses to keep observing the round) I agree that it's not a deal-breaking issue, but it is one that has bothered me a little over time, and is one of the only new things I have to add for feedback after posting on the last two versions of this application. I asked my questions about it to learn more about Hunter's OOC expectations as a player, not to call him out as 'possibly shit.' He answered those, so now the answers can speak for themselves. With that i mind, I think I'm neutral on this fifth application in the end. I'm being more critical than I usually get, after the fallout/complaint from the strip and the many reapplications, and should probably step back from the process here. Link to comment
Boriss Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 1by1 - the directory player отличный проигрыватель для сэмплов Link to comment
Chaznoodles Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 1by1 - the directory player отличный проигрыватель для сэмплов You might want to put the subject in the subject and not the topic, buddy. Link to comment
HunterRS Posted November 28, 2016 Author Share Posted November 28, 2016 =With that i mind, I think I'm neutral on this fifth application in the end. I'm being more critical than I usually get, after the fallout/complaint from the strip and the many reapplications, and should probably step back from the process here. I understand why you are being more critical, and I answered the best I could. I just ask you to not take me wanting to be Head of Staff to the point of reapplying multiple times to a negative perspective. I am confident I want this and will try my best to get this position. Link to comment
Something Vile Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 Eh, I don't have very much interaction with Dawnguard in character, but I'm inclined to believe that Hunter is more than capable in ambition and attitude for being a head of staff. I've seen how excited he gets about this topic, and I've listened to him gush about his work in science to others in the discord channel. So, while my knowledge on the app is limited, I'm still willing to give him a +1 on the merit that he's sure to do his best, whatever that may be, when or if he attains the position of a head of staff, such as RD. Link to comment
sdtwbaj Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 +1 I quite enjoy Hunter's characters, he definitely is down for the arpee. His attitude in OOC is enjoyable, he'd make a good head of staff. Link to comment
Blingx3 Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 I cannot support this application and I think you should wait for sometime before applying again for this position, as your application is slighty changed aswell as your ingame behavior. give it some time and start a new application, so you'd start fresh and with a new approch Link to comment
HunterRS Posted December 11, 2016 Author Share Posted December 11, 2016 I cannot support this application and I think you should wait for sometime before applying again for this position, as your application is slighty changed aswell as your ingame behavior. give it some time and start a new application, so you'd start fresh and with a new approch I understand your decision, but when people say a new approach, I won't be able to become interim at all because of rules, I can't prove myself capable of acutally doing anything right, this is why I isolated myself in science, to get people to trust me more. Link to comment
Haveatya Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 I enjoy his characters and he is a fine person in OOC. That is coming from someone who has had multiple disagreements with him in and out of game. Despite this I respect him as a player and individual. +1 from me, I think he'd make a great Head. Link to comment
HunterRS Posted December 12, 2016 Author Share Posted December 12, 2016 I enjoy his characters and he is a fine person in OOC. That is coming from someone who has had multiple disagreements with him in and out of game. Despite this I respect him as a player and individual. +1 from me, I think he'd make a great Head. I just noticed that your the same guy from the Nanda incident, yah that kinda got bad, no hard feelings toward ya, Thanks for the support my friend. Link to comment
coolbc2000 Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 Alright, I don't really post on Whitelist apps, but I feel like I need to talk about Hunter, mostly OCC'ly. Want to also talk about his whitelist strip. Let me just throw in my two cents here and hope I don't go on a rant. Hunter...Hunter where to start. OCC'ly you are probably a good guy, the fuck I know, I won't ever meet you or would I care to meet you. But dear god if I am ever playing with you I just have this urge to punch you in the face. You seem so self-fucking-centered and you take a jab as a fucking stab-wound. Everything is serious for you, Tool explained this well, in Supremacy and Call of War, it's just terrible to play with you, you somehow just take all the fun out of the round and go "Lol fucking rush tanks and no RP booooooooois" . As for Edward? I would rather you pick someone else, really. It's just like I can't pick Mark Syion as my Head of Staff whitelist. And just even the fact that your whitelist was taken from you in the first place is just a no-no from me. -1 Wish you the best of luck, I really do. Link to comment
Tequilajoe Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 While your tenacity is commendable, I simply don't think you have what it takes to be a head of staff. You do know how to play the game, and you understand how to do various roles with competency. However, you are completely devoid of meaningful communication skills, so your ability to lead, delegate, and roleplay are in question. I know this sounds harsh, but I don't do this because I hate you, I want to see you improve. Improve your attitude in ooc, communicate more with your coworkers, dont try to do everything yourself, maybe teach others how to do things, and most importantly, laugh and cry with your coworkers so we know that Edgar is human and not some soulless robot (or rather, that you are capable of roleplay). -1, Give it a few more months. Link to comment
HunterRS Posted December 13, 2016 Author Share Posted December 13, 2016 While your tenacity is commendable, I simply don't think you have what it takes to be a head of staff. You do know how to play the game, and you understand how to do various roles with competency. However, you are completely devoid of meaningful communication skills, so your ability to lead, delegate, and roleplay are in question. I know this sounds harsh, but I don't do this because I hate you, I want to see you improve. Improve your attitude in ooc, communicate more with your coworkers, dont try to do everything yourself, maybe teach others how to do things, and most importantly, laugh and cry with your coworkers so we know that Edgar is human and not some soulless robot (or rather, that you are capable of roleplay). -1, Give it a few more months. I still thank you for the comment, and I appreicate the response, but as said multiple times, I have started to change how Edgar is, I have taught multiple people Toxins and Xenoarch, also I like to RP more then actually being antag, every round I am merc I want to do an RP something instead of murderboning. Also, with laughing and crying, I work with Adolph, who he despises dearly, so he tries to not show emotion when working with him cause he has seen him do stuff, but also in game stuff has happened that I can't say cause reasons, so I understand your concern, I am working to change him a lot over the holidays, so if you get the chance to see him, then maybe I can change your mind. With that, Thanks again for your complaint, with it being as bad as it is. Link to comment
HunterRS Posted December 13, 2016 Author Share Posted December 13, 2016 You are always trying to vote to end the round at the earliest opportunity. When I last asked you about this, you'd said that it's basically because you're bored. While no-one's obligated to be thrilled by every round, this is a pattern of behavior so consistent that people are associating it with you as a player. The whole 'Votes for a crew transfer at 2 hours' is a completely dumb matter at most, and has no reason to be used as a negative for an application like this. I hate it when people bring this up as a 'this guy is possibly shit'. If it really was an issue, I would be posting logs of every incident that a head of staff player or even a member of staff (Who I can just claim as being lazy/refuses to keep observing the round) @HunterRS I read logs of the day that lead up to your initial whitelist strip, and let me say. It was a total fucking mess, and from what I've seen and been told after asking about, You completely ignored CC orders of 'the guy is fine let him do his gimmick' Despite the gimmick being very snowflakey, You should of simply pulled up your pants and let them do whatever the hell they want due to them most likely having CCIA permission, that you must follow as head of security due to your loyalty implant. If anything also, you should of ahelped every action you were about to take to try and protect yourself from this kind of stuff happening. As for Dawnguard, most my experiences with him was mainly "SLIMES ESCAPED I'M DYING". I'm gonna remain neutral on this matter for now. Sorry for being so late on your comment, I totally missed it. I would like to point out that that strip day was a mess, and I messed up by not ahelping, it was a mistake on my part and I realized that, thats why I havn't played security in a while. Also IC, the last time I played Xenobio as Edgar is when I was tratior a few days ago, the last outbreak was a long time ago, if you havn't played in the past month or two I understand, but IC it's different. Link to comment
Recommended Posts