[2 Binned] i120 Disregard of Area Regulations.

[Butterrobber202]

Basically.

Smoking in Medical or other areas with signs like this, telling you not to do something, if you do it, i120 is broken and you serve 5 minutes in da slammer.

open to a better description.

[ViolentHAM]

Kinda agree. Let it be illegal again.

[sonicgotnuked]

Can't you tell them to fuck off, then if they don't you can charge with ignoring orders?

[Faris]

Fairly sure this would be a violation of injunction? So an infraction is already present for it.

[Azande]

You can charge someone under various charges for refusing to stop smoking in designated areas.

[ShameOnTurtles]

There are actually a couple regulations this falls under.

For one, as Aboshehab said, you could put it under violating an injunction.

It could also be put under neglect of duty. If a doctor is smoking in the medical bay and refuses to stop upon request, he definitely deserves that charge.

Alternatively, if a head of staff ordered that doctor to stop smoking, then a charge of failure to execute an order would also apply. You could also argue that security ordering someone to stop smoking in a no smoking area counts as a valid order, but the regulation does say "a superior's valid orders."

[Guest Marlon Phoenix]

There are several "catch-all" regulations that already exist to punish these behaviors. It is my view that it is better to enforce the catch-alls rather than create additional regulations because then we end up with redundancy.

[Arrow768]

I am voting for dismissal since this is already covered by multiple other regulations and not really a development issue

[Skull132]

It's been a week! +1 dismissal for reasons already pointed out: there exist charges + injunctions to cover this. Apply them.

Archived.