Jump to content

TishinaStalker

Members
  • Posts

    1,586
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TishinaStalker

  1. Consider your application approved. I will now lock the thread, and set the prefix to Processing. Make sure to check back every now and then because once the prefix is changed to Complete, then it means the item is present in the code, and ready for your use.
  2. How about no harassing on-duty personnel and Central Command approved visitors? I don't think we should wait for Jade Rathel to call a VIP something horribly rude before applying an injunction.
  3. I think people on the station would be better. That way, you can't harass a visitor, but if they're an antag I think Security could let it slide up until you start getting really disruptive during something like negotiations (such as the times that Vittorio told nuke ops that he would do terrible things to their collective mothers).
  4. I just have one tiny issue with the wording. It makes it totally fine and okay to harass the hell out of your coworker if they're not doing their job; which is not okay from a workplace POV.
  5. lmao. Application denied due to the item already being easily available through the loadout.
  6. Yeah, after the discussion had here, I'm afraid I'm going to have to deny your application. Don't let this stop you from applying for a different item in the future though.
  7. Why not just spawn in with white gloves in your custom loadout?
  8. Next time, create your own application. Consider your application approved. I will now lock the thread, and set the prefix to Processing. Make sure to check back every now and then because once the prefix is changed to Complete, then it means the item is present in the code, and ready for your use.
  9. Just to make sure, all you want is a sprite edit of your ushanka, yes?
  10. Consider your application approved. I will now lock the thread, and set the prefix to Processing. Make sure to check back every now and then because once the prefix is changed to Complete, then it means the item is present in the code, and ready for your use.
  11. Consider your application approved. I will now lock the thread, and set the prefix to Processing. Make sure to check back every now and then because once the prefix is changed to Complete, then it means the item is present in the code, and ready for your use.
  12. You know you need a break from SS13 when you see a bald, arrest them for being bald, and then find out that bald is played by Meowykins.
  13. Consider your application approved. I will now lock the thread, and set the prefix to Processing. Make sure to check back every now and then because once the prefix is changed to Complete, then it means the item is present in the code, and ready for your use.
  14. I personally wish you could've given a better reason other than "Asthma is too whimpy". Delivering your application is important, and giving weak reasons like that never helps your case. Now, I would be willing to accept this application, but only as long as one thing is made clear: 1) The inhaler will not have any actual, mechanical medicine like dexalin. Any medicine in this thing is for you to RP out. How's that sound?
  15. Consider your application approved. I will now lock the thread, and set the prefix to Processing. Make sure to check back every now and then because once the prefix is changed to Complete, then it means the item is present in the code, and ready for your use.
  16. Well... That can be done even with an implant, Frances. CC may order something, but you might not perceive it as protecting NT's interests. That's where you disobey orders, but under your own belief of NT interests. We can take Elena's situation where there was an unknown lifeform on board that committed murder and could use their whole body as a weapon. CC ordered it to be contained, but Elena was probably thinking "I can contain it if it's dead, protect station personnel, the station, and NT's interests are safe." Also, once again, they're not forced to act like mindless drones. "Keep NT's interests in mind" is totally different from "I love < NANOTRASEN >. I love < PLASMA >." One being where you still have your own willpower, freedom of choice, and the other being a mindless drone, get me? Also, yeah, we pretty much have the same thought train for IAA's role, Frances. Jackboot: I've only punished one whitelistee so far for doing something against implant, and that captain gave a really jumpy non-sec Tajaran an energy pistol before walking along his merry way; said Tajaran then sparked a massive firefight in starboard primary after the shuttle docked. I personally don't see how loyalty implant removes from RP when I've only had one case of needing to punish an implantee for doing something horrendous that led to massive rule fractures from 5+ people. Apologies if I'm not seeing your point, but I personally don't see how the implant is removing RP. Also, as a note, Wardens aren't implanted. Only HoS, Captain, and IAA require loyalty implantation.
  17. The IC purpose of loyalty implants is so that you act in Nanotrasen's interests. If an HoS/Captain lose their cool in a way, but are still acting within bounds and in NT's interests, then there's no point in filing a complaint because the person is still sticking to character, and the limit that being HoS/Captain brings. I don't want to say that the complaint is futile because that'll send a negative message about complaints, but if the HoS is putting his life at risk in order to protect NT assets & interests, then that's fine, within character, and acting out the implant. For example, there are four nuclear operatives and 5 officers + 1 warden on-station. If one of the operatives is taken down, their equipment is secured, etc. then the HoS should probably (by NT interests) stay somewhere safe, like the bridge (since the Warden has armory access and the HoS needs to make sure the others heads of staff are safe), and coordinate Security from there because to go hunting for the operatives is risking his/her life unnecessarily and not in NT's interests because it's like cutting the head off of the snake in the case of death. Now though, if there's four operatives and an officer is shot while another one is undergoing surgery, then it WOULD be in NT's interests for you to either push for an ERT request or help your officers repel the intruders because of a lack of manpower. The captain could do the same if they have sufficient weapons training, but the same thing sticks for both of them: Do not do it unnecessarily perilously such as going alone. In conclusion, I believe the loyalty implant is serving its purpose of making implanted heads of staff think twice on "Is this helping the station?" both OOC'ly and IC'ly because an HoS or Captain losing their gear can spell disaster for the station in both OOC and IC terms; as such, I personally don't believe in removing the implant from HoS/Captains. As for IAAs, I'm iffy about this. If they don't have one, then they can have friends, be biased, and all around be a nuisance to specific people because they annoyed one of their friends. This could lead to some interesting RP, I'd admit, but I'm more worried about something drastic like somebody getting demoted because the IAA managed to convince a head of staff, but the person didn't really do something bad. On the other hand, a loyalty implanted IAA doesn't really stop you from having a social life (as everybody seems to believe). I always believed that loyalty implants have a varying effect from (at least) making you have NT's interests in mind to being a drone to NT (at most). An IAA having friends on the station doesn't stop them from doing their job because at the end of the day, during an investigation, NT's interests are on the brain, and stop bias. Go drink (in moderation because it's not in NT's interests to get shitfaced), go converse with your friend in atmospherics (until there's a complaint that needs to be filed), but keep in mind to just have a look around every now and then to make sure SOP is being followed. You're not a drone! You're still you! You love (NANOTRASEN) talking to people? That's fine. You love (PLASMA) having a walk around the station instead of being cooped up in your office like you think you're supposed to? That's fine too! Just don't forget you have a job to do, and that you have to keep NT's interests in mind.
  18. Wow, uh, I'm dumb. I totally forgot that I wanted to close this application. Apologies. Self-deny. Locking and archiving.
  19. Maybe one-thousand is a good point to shut up. <3 u delta
  20. Application denied due to inactivity. Feel free to apply again. Locking and archiving.
  21. You were not banned because I thought you were lying to me. I read the logs, deduced that you were, in fact, telling the truth, and then moved on to the next big issue; plasmagrief. You were banned for plasmagrief and refusing to read the rules. I asked you to read the rules and copy paste to me the rules that you broke, but you refused to. If you had done that, then you would've been showing me "Look, I am reading the rules". Instead, you were essentially saying "There's no point, you'll ban me anyway." I considered letting you off the hook with a severe warning, but then you refused to do it, and I still let you off with a lighter punishment than I should've. This only tells me that you do not care for the rules in the first place, and if you do not care for the rules, then you probably shouldn't play to begin with. The rules you broke are: -The singularity and atmos are generally off-limits, due to the impact they can have on the round. If you think you have a really good reason to mess with either, adminhelp first to get clearance. || You threw plasma grenades around the station, which you admitted on this appeal. -Only escalate conflict in a realistic manner - some characters might overreact, but you would not realistically go berserk or attempt to kill someone because they stole your prized pen, for instance. || "Do this or I kill you" being said by a random colleague doesn't generally get you to detonate plasma grenades and start plasma fires. -Characters must be believable, and well-rounded. No insane or psychotic characters. No Mary Sues. || Same reason as above. A normal, sane person doesn't start plasma fires simply because a colleague said so. They said something, and you immediately jumped to the task. That's not RP nor build up. Plasmagrief generally carries a week ban, but I decided to give you two days less due to an antag being involved in causing you to carry this out. That does not change the fact though that what you carried out was essentially atmospherics grief, and in a manner that caused an extreme annoyance to the administrator that was trying to undo it. See: http://puu.sh/h3Ytw/3afce329c3.png
  22. Building on what Valkrae said (and my opinion as one of the people in charge of whitelist applications): The loyalty implants use is so you're always watching out for Nanotrasen's interests. Elena perceived a highly dangerous person with genetic modification; presumably an unknown species that proved hostile. CentralCommand may have ordered "Contain it", and that would be in NT's long-term interest, but what of its short-term interests? Would you want to work for a company where they doggedly attempted to capture an unknown species that was actively killing people, but managed to capture it for research or would you feel safer and confident knowing that its Security personnel had the training to take it down, and save potential lives? This is where Elena perceived conflicting interests for Nanotrasen, and she took the least dangerous option to protect NT's image. This had build-up and IC reasons for it, Elena's actions created controversy as we can clearly see, and this clearly created more RP due to Elena's decision which made more Security personnel think "Wait, why am I doing this again?" Bokaza acted like a captain, and made a rational decision. I'm not seeing the issue on Bokaza as a head of staff.
  23. Yeah, Dea and I planned on giving you this extra chance because we believe you deserve one. Application accepted Glory to Aurora
  24. Hello, question concerning how long you've been here: Are you sure you've been here for over a year? I have never seen you here since I started playing here in July 2014, and at the same time staff members that are even way older than me on the server have 0 dice on who you are.
  25. Yeahhhh, application denied for obvious reasons. Locking and archiving.
×
×
  • Create New...