Jump to content

niennab

Lore Writers
  • Content Count

    580
  • Joined

  • Last visited

7 Followers

About niennab

  • Rank
    Captain

Linked Accounts

  • Byond CKey
    niennab

Recent Profile Visitors

5,377 profile views
  1. More art. I may be opening myself for commissions soon although given the uncertainty of my schedule it may have to be one at a time.
  2. I have to withdraw my support as well. I typically only enjoy extended and that means if I vote and lose, I will more than likely just wait 2 hours and try again. With the proposed version it just seems as though the losing side is being punished by trying to vote for what they want. Worse yet I fear this will cause am even greater less likelihood that we will see extended voted for, since it often loses. Only the winning votes should be readied.
  3. I think it'd be a great addition but ultimately it comes down to a developer taking on the project.
  4. Once again @Haydizzle comes in and does my work for me. Nonetheless, thank you for applying! This is an all around solid application that demonstrates an understanding of IPCs. Accepted. Typically I am not strict when it comes to where exactly an IPC was manufactured (other than the star system), however good catch with the wiki stuff. I’ll see to fixing that detail in the next set of days.
  5. I agree with Abo. There are some players who prefer anonymity and I would hate to see that feature taken from them. However if there was a way to somehow detach the name from the roles being fought over, I'd be on board.
  6. Thank you for the clarifications. Your application demonstrates an understanding of IPCs, accepted.
  7. Staff ultimately set a precedent for what is appropriate behavior and if you don't see it as an issue, nor something that needs to be reigned in (or only reigned in in specific places when told to stop), then I dont believe you'd be fit for staff. Just today you made this remark here in the lore Discord. Which, ultimately leaves me uncertain how to really read the application as a whole.
  8. Hello, thank you for applying! Since the answer is specific, which nations/planets are you referring to here? I’m curious as well if you can expand on what you mean by IPCs are treated with almost the same rights as humans in Biesel?
  9. An expansion on synthetics as well as an update following the KOTW arc has been added to Konyang’s page. Additionally, gestures of prayer as well as the Konyang holy sites have been added to the Trinary Perfection page. (Art of the gestures has been pushed to a later release.) Credit to Schwann for the Konyang expansion and Trinary Perfection gestures. https://wiki.aurorastation.org/index.php?title=Konyang https://wiki.aurorastation.org/index.php?title=The_Trinary_Perfection#Gestures_of_Prayer
  10. Denying this application for reasons explained via Discord. If you’d like to discuss the matter further you’re welcome to reach out to me nonetheless.
  11. Some recent stuff I’ve been making in Procreate.
  12. Can you format the story so it isn’t a wall of text? In addition to an expansion on the backstory. How did the character make their way to the Aurora, why, so on and so forth. Who owns them then and now, etc etc. Moreover, what is meant by this portion here? On the topic of ownership and citizenship, they are separate things. An IPC can be self-owned but not possess any citizenship. The passage there is ultimately referring to synthetics whose owner passes or run away synthetics from other star systems. Each star system and sometimes even planets treats their IPCs differently.
  13. Hello, thank you for applying! Are you able to greatly expand on the backstory? As it stands, it’s too bare bones. I recommend trying to tell a story with that portion of the application. Moving on, what do you mean by this? Moreover this portion here? Presently the only way to acquire a Biesel citizenship is through the TCFL or the Golden Deep. Lastly, if I am reading this right, you haven’t read the IPC wiki?
  14. Removing the second bartender slot would be an awful change. A full bar is just about impossible to navigate AND rp in. Having a second person on staff means both the players and bartenders get to have more meaningful interaction between one another. Moreover, on those shifts where no one decides to visit the bar, the bartender potentially has another RP buddy.
  15. There have been a few instances where I voted extended, it won, and only after it won I went "Wait why did I do that, I dont actually want to play". Which was honestly unfair of me to do. I think by imposing this, it will mean the player has to decide "do I really want to play" or, "do I want to vote, not knowing the manifest". As such I think this would be a good change.
×
×
  • Create New...