BurgerBB

Loyalty implants are honestly a terrible idea on Aurora and with the wiki addition I just recently learned that gives your character freedom to act like an emotional snowflake just makes it worse. Loyalty implants that force you to act seriously irrational is honestly just bad roleplay design as it forces the Captain to go along with whatever loyalist gimmick chosen even if it's unreasonable or seriously unrealistic for a NanoTrasen thing to do. Most sane servers just make them "Mindshield Implants" which makes the owner immune to traitor conversions mechanically and philosophy, teachings, and policies that don't fit with nanotrasen from a roleplay perspective. Mindshield implants are genius because it allows Captains and Heads of Security to say no to things that NanoTrasen would not reasonably do such as to randomly prison all xenos as a social experiment or force doctors to mine the asteroid with pickaxes because they need more phoron.

Not even after 45 minutes. After 0 minutes. Crew transfer requires 2/3rds the vote anyways so if the round is good, people would support it. Having this code red restriction just means that shitty antags can abuse this feature. I recall that an antag even exploited it once by demanding the Captain to set the alert level to code red 5 minutes before a transfer vote because ??????. I mean as people said there was a 3 hour round yesterday with a shitty MALF who kept canceling the emergency transfer shuttle and that was apparently appropriate for them to do despite them literally doing nothing of substance. Aurorastation just isn't worth my time playing on when you give all these "protections" to antagonists that allow them to force their shitty gimmicks down their throat.

This is unironically dumb as hell and makes emergency situations worse, and certain antags stupidly powerful. I know it's an HRP server but sec not getting maint access practically means that teleporting antags are more powerful than they already are and it will be difficult to escape emergency situations. Legitimately if I had one wish from god it would be to revert this PR. Nothing about this PR is constructive towards gameplay.

Actually, you can lock this thread if no one has anything else to say. I have nothing else to say on the matter and I unironically don't really have any faith in future arguments made here by me or by others. I just realised that my latest post here is the same shit I've been saying for like a year or two now so given that and how nothing has changed because of my arguments, I don't think there is really a point into me being here.

Here is the giant meme here. Here are the three paths of Aurorastation Staff that I've dealt with. It's only these paths; and there are usually never any variations of it. Path 1: 1. Staff/Player straight up insults me. 2. I ignore it. My day is a little bit worse. 3. Nothing changes in the person's behavior. Path 2: 1. Staff/Player straight up insults me. 2. I report it to a mod. 3. 9 times out of 10 they don't see an issue with it, claim it's just banter or something, and move on. 1 times out of 10 they say they talked to them. 4. Nothing changes in the person's behavior. My day is a little bit worse. Path 3: 1. Staff player straight up insults me. 2. I tell them to fuck off. 3. They get upset and spew more insults. 4. I report their behavior because I know they're actually doing this not because it's banter but because they're actually upset because any normal, sane person would fuck off. 5. I get one of the following responses from staff: You shouldn't have provoked them! You started it!!! (I didn't) It doesn't matter who started it! You insulted them too! Both sides are in the wrong here! 6. We both get punished equally. See, you say that you've never punished people for lighthearted comments in OOC but you have. I'm pretty sure the moderation team on Aurora or on Discord can talk about how they striked someone for rude comments on OOC. I've reported plenty of people in OOC for rude comments and in some cases admins have said they've given notes, warnings, or talks to people for it. Hell, just look at that one CIAA dude's staff complaint thread where they got a note and then asked for me to get banned and the staff member to revoke their note or something after trying to start shit with me 3 times, and in all instances of me telling me "Fuck off, you're seriously acting like a cunt right now." Like, don't get me wrong, I'm a fan of not banning people because they said something that the other person didn't like, but I'm not a fan of players not being able to stand up for themselves and telling players to fuck off. If one person says some shit, and the other person doesn't react, no one gives a shit because it isn't an argument; it's just some guy saying shit. If one person says some shit, and the other person tells them to fuck off, that's suddenly an issue because it's technically a fight now and it may or may not start a long argument. This is kind of fucking weird considering that Garn himself has justified his rude behavior because I was rude but I guess we're ignoring that. I've noticed in my time here is that the only time staff ever give a shit about a situation is when it lasts more than 5 seconds. Like I tried talking to you, Skull, about the amount of petty harassment I receive over PRs that I've made by like 2-3 users and you've said something along the lines of "We can't protect you from your reputation." and decided to not even look into the matter. The only time any conflict became an issue to staff was when I told people to fuck off every time they made repeat insults. Those situations are always eye rolling considering that in nearly every case where that happened, I was told that both sides are in the wrong despite me reporting the behavior to moderators before I told them to fuck off. In some cases, I laughed externally and then cried internally for an entire hour when they lecture me that I should've reported the behavior to a moderator when they started insulting me when I actually did. Like I'm just going to bring up Shev again because that's pretty much a nuclear bomb argument at this point that nearly everyone is familiar with. When I was reporting his shit behavior constantly, staff wouldn't give a shit or just defer it to Garn, who didn't give a shit. It was clear that no one really cared that the dude was acting like this so one time I told him to fuck off after he said something and garn decided to both ban us for a week regardless of who started it. I'm completely aware that Garn has expressed regret for doing it like this but it's clear that nothing has really changed from that.

It was a complaint about both. The reason why I never talked about it publicly except for a few select users because it's just unironically humiliating so I went to you because you were the one handling forum deletion posts and I couldn't contact anyone else as I was gone from the discord. The most important thing I think to me at the time was to focus on the fact that a disgruntled creep was saying some pretty invalid shit but apparently you thought it was valid so I gave up on that entirely. I don't know if I went to alb first, or second, but the attitude you gave and the attitude alb gave felt like they didn't really give a shit so I just gave up on that. Like believe it or not, both of you gave a pretty shitty attitude to the situation; like an actual fucking pretty shit attitude. "He made some valid points." is not the response you should really give when I bring up a moderator who's been acting like an actual degenerate to the point where they made a player feel uncomfortable. Do you notice my shift in punctuation after you said that? I was shocked but at that point I was just annoyed at you guys and just gave up entirely because quite frankly at that time, and honestly at this time, I seriously don't believe that you give a shit about staff acting out of line.

Lord Fowl wasn't banned or removed from his position from what I heard despite the amount of shit flinging he's done to others. The rulings of his complaints clearly did not change his attitude and he continued being an ass to others until he apparently left on his own accord. I mean sure, problem solved, but I don't understand why there was so much lenience. With the erp stuff, I recall saying to Arrow or someone "Hey uh, I don't think this guy is acting in good faith because of creepy erp stuff." and they said it didn't matter. Evidence wasn't brought up or anything because I specifically recall that someone said that the incident was irrelevant and wouldn't matter when it comes to a complaint against me so I stopped there. If someone said that it wasn't even a crime to begin with, why would I bother to bring up the evidence especially when the issue is exceptionally sensitive and deserves private discussion? I don't really know how to explain to you how me telling someone that they're acting like a cunt and garn saying to me "And there is nothing you can do about it." when garn has a history of making fun of my complaints as a member of staff is in the same league. They're both shitty behavior and deserve some sort of action. Let me post what I said initially about the coalf stuff. This isn't me changing my point. This is the case of a head admin literally justifying shitty behavior because that's just how they behave. As I said before, I shouldn't have to make a staff complaint to appeal a decision like this because in no world should it be okay for an admin to justify this sort of behavior. My point is that staff let staff get away with shit. Bringing up "Oh, you made a complaint about it and it was ruled against Coalf's behavior" changes very little. I am happy that you're bringing this issue up with staff, though, and I think you for that. Again my "goal" here is not to demand everyone that has wronged me to be permabanned but to ensure shit like this doesn't happen. Like sometimes I think that others think I'm doing this to complain, but I kinda give a shit about Aurora to the point where I've spent 10 hours out of my weekend coding PRs and 2 hours writing complaints or making posts that would hopefully help Aurora for the better.

"Moderation staff do not handle staff complaints related to devs." Okay. That's not what I said. The fact that it wasn't dealt with until he left, not the fact that it wasn't dealt with by a moderator. The fact that it wasn't touched at all says something, honestly. I don't care who is supposed to look at it; that and the fact that Lord Fowl has had zero behavior change despite all his complaints. "You should have made a complaint or told an admin, I am not going to chase ghosts, mostly when there is zero evidence of anything." I was literally banned when I reported it. There were no head admins other than garn and garn at the time was exceptionally hostile and I couldn't contact the rest of the admins because I didn't have access to anyone's discord. Arrow was literally the only one I could talk to, and at the time, he was handling things with people shitposting on my ban appeal thread. When I did bring it up after I was banned, no one took it seriously and staff rather chastise me for not making an official complaint. The point of me bringing this up because a staff member saw no issue with it when I reported it. "I mean, you were also insulting them, I don't see how that makes you right here as well. So, I do believe that a warning for both of you is fine." I just told them to fuck off and that they were being an asshole when they were insulting and trashtalking me in public channels on multiple occasions. Telling someone who is harassing you that they're being an asshole is absolutely nothing worth warning the victim over, and it is literally in line with the behavior of most members here. Like even if you look on the discord and search "being an asshole" you'll see several staff members, including mods, unironically tell other users to stop being an asshole in heated conversations or in general conversation. Regardless, It should absolutely matter who was trying to provoke the other. Like imagine being a staff member and the first thing you do to a dude who just got off a permaban is try to bait them into behavior that would get them banned, and then when you were noted for the behavior, you double down by asking for the member in question you're harassing to be permabanned in a staff complaint. That behavior wasn't even addressed at all despite how obvious it was. "You should have made a complaint in this case. I also don't have any recollection of this happening." The beauty is that I reported it in a complaint. It wasn't addressed or anything at all for about a week until garn eventually apologized for it. "I mean, I don't see how him being sassy is fine when you literally goes; "oh of course it was you garn" when he tries to apologize for shooting you in game by accident." I mean, I'm assuming you mean "I don't see him being sassy is an issue if you were sassy.", and if so, that's pretty fucking ironic here considering in this instance you're going "Well since you provoked him, it's fine." but in the instance where another staff member literally baited and tried to get me banned it's "Oh both sides are at fault. Oh, I'm just going to hand out warnings. Oh, it seems the warning I'm giving you is more serious that the other person's warning." And as for the coalf thing it shouldn't have taken a complaint. I literally told staff on discord about it and had a conversation, as linked there, and they found no issue with it. I shouldn't have had to make a complaint about it. The point of me bringing it up was not that it wasn't dealt with, but the fact that it wasn't dealt with at the time because of an excuse made by a head administrator, justifying the behavior. And honestly I think you're not getting the point of this. I've told you why I feel that the jokes are inappropriate. My post is not an attack on staff or some sort of accusation post, but rather the reason why I believe that there is genuinely some sort of issue going on in with behavior. Like I shitpost as much as anyone, I hang out with shitposters as much as anyone, but the sort of shit that staff seem to get away with is just appalling. I've talked to people about this, inside and outside the server, which is why I don't immediately think I'm insane when I write multiparagraph posts about how Aurorastation has staff issues and they haven't changed despite promises to change. I don't know if you know this, but staff make themselves absolutely unapproachable when they shitpost "find out icly" when new players ask in ooc for help, or "make a staff complaint" when users report issues to admins, despite it being small, and then finally "just ahelp it" in discord conversations when people try to talk about the bigger picture of terrible behavior by certain groups of people, whether they be security players, antags, or staff themselves. Believe it or not, people don't bring up issues to complain, they bring it up because they want to see some change for the better.

Let me give you some understanding and some proof, then. When I made a complaint against Lord Fowl, it wasn't addressed until he actually left despite the numerous other issues that he caused when I was gone from Aurora. Two months later, after the complaint was made, it was marked resolved because Lord Fowl left the staff team because of issues. That's a pretty big indication of something. There is also the case where I tried to report an ex-moderator's creepy behavior erp-like to the point where I literally blocked, avoided, and stopped playing the character he was chasing after to Arrow ,but I got told it was irrelevant and not an issue. I mentioned this after my unban and after the person in question left the community, but the first thing a staff member said wasn't "Wow that's fucked up." or "Let's look into this." but rather "Why did you tell Arrow and not an admin lmao." and nothing further from that. There is also the case where a CIAA member harassed me in OOC and on discord and we both got punished "equally" (I got a threat of permaban, they didn't) because I told them to fuck off and that their comments were unwanted. I reported it to an admin, and they ignored me until I practically ordered them to look into the matter. They got a note because of it, and as a result they made a player complaint thread that lead to me getting a warning and threatened with a ban request. There is also the case where an admin straight up and ironically insulted me twice after a head admin told everyone to shut up and stop the shit flinging. When questioned why the head admin didn't take any action, they defended the admin saying "Oh they're just feisty like that. Don't think too much of it." There is also the case where Garn called me retarded or disabled or something in anger. When I reported it, it was ignored long enough to the point where Garn eventually apologized for his remarks about a week or so later. I've seen non-staff members instantly get striked for that sort of thing yet I don't even think it was looked at and I don't even think Garn was talked to about it. Then you have an instance where, in admitted annoyance and/or anger, that same Garn says "And there is nothing you can do about it." when you pseudo-complain about their actions as antag while also having a history on discord saying that they're immune to staff complaints. Given all this, I genuinely think that Aurora has some sort of unfair bias in favor of staff here and what they can get away with. Any sane person who has experienced what I experienced would probably believe the same thing, and I think some people have. That is why I find jokes about staff being immune to complaints, especially staff who has a history of provoking people, to be offensive.

I don't think that's how it went down, accurately. A vote for zombies was called around the crew transfer shuttle. I made my case saying that zombies were excessively laggy during highpop and their balance was questionable. Players agreed, while staff kept saying things like "HOW COULD YOU NOT SAY YES TO ZOMBIES?", complained that zombie events were rare and that it was halloween, and were ultimately disappointed when people don't vote no. After the round ended, there was another vote by another admin. Some players were confused as hell because there was already a vote. Noticeably less people voted since it was round end, but the result this time was "Yes" with ~60% of the players voting yes. The admins, during the vote, cited that the players were just simply misinformed and that the gamemode actually had new features. That statement probably would've gotten a "half true" rating on PolitiFact as the only feature that was added is that now all species can get infected. The lag issue or the balance issues weren't touched and people's mains concerns weren't addressed, but of course it was enough for people to vote yes. Yonnimer then told people that if they don't like zombies, then they should just not play. This seems kind of malicious; doing a vote twice because you didn't like the previous outcome even if you think players are "misinformed". Like imagine if an admin cancelled the crew transfer shuttle because people were misinformed about the round's progression and then just held another vote. I don't really see the difference here. It 100% feels like they expected people to vote zombies, but when people voted no, they were surprised but just held another vote and started vote swaying the fuck out of everyone this time.

are you aware that my opinions can change on a subject throughout the 1 year since I made that PR My PR seemed like a good idea at the time but ultimately it's a bad PR. I've said this plenty of times before and expressed my regret for making that PR. That PR caused issues and so will this one.

Do you know what would nerf cryomixes? A limit on how much you body can metabolize chemicals at once. In total. If I drink 800 different chemicals inside a 800 unit container it would all metabolize at once. That is why mixes are powerful. This is how you fix chemistry's bullshit, not by punishing doctors or players.

Okay. As a contributor and an ex-dev, I want to remove cloning. I want to completely remove it to make the game better, but I know that it would be dumb to do that despite it making medical better because the issue is that it would seriously make medical absolutely more unfun. Hell, a less extreme example, I want to seriously nerf the shit out of chemicals but doing that would make medical more more tedious. Medical needs to be more fun to play before it receives any nerfs that involve removing a core feature to medical.

Like I'm super fucking surprised that people are saying yes to this. I absolutely guarantee that there will be significantly more instances of malpractices with this PR considering that 25% to 50% of medical players are inexperienced or new. The problems with medical is not because cryo exists or body scanners exist, it's because of all the bullshit chemicals that exist in chemistry that make wounds easy as hell to cure. Some of the people here are saying "oh cryocells take too long and are annoying" but these people don't seem to realise that instead of spending 1-2 minutes waiting in a cryo cell you're going to have doctors spending 2-3 minutes trying to diagnose you. The only time medical is really ever used in Aurorastation is when miners fall or when the antagonist start shooting up the place, putting 3-4 officers in critical condition.

I am absolutely not a fan of this. Before any serious non-chemistry nerfs are made to medical, medical needs to be more fun to play. Honestly there is a literal brain drain for medical players because medical is absolutely not fun to play.

I took one look at gamemode selection and fucking stopped. But I did make a PR that was effectively what Geeves was going for.

Just to add on that, I admit that I shouldn't have said that. I admit that I stepped out of line with critiquing you. But I don't think it was right for you to say that sort of thing.

I'll cease posting in here after this unless the admin who handles this pings me directly because it seems that my comments aren't helping and your tone is definitely not helping. The reason why I said "Oh of course it was you." was not because I was annoyed that you shot me but because of the entirety of the situation. I was debating to myself whether or not I should ahelp him to perhaps get an admin to possibly tell them the proper way of escalation and maybe not meme so much during the round (two small things adding up to a medium thing). Realising it was you just gave me a quick bout of depression given my observations of your character during the round, your traitor HoP I saw once, and George Butterfill or whatever their name was before I was banned for 6 months, and your actions OOC. Understand that it's incredibly difficult to ahelp a headadmin and the host, and even more difficult to write a player/staff complaint on one who has repeatedly said several times, even jokingly, that they cannot be touched by staff complaints and has shown an absolute careless attitude when it comes to anything administration related, such as ahelps and staff complaints and has actively made fun of ongoing and previous staff complaints. You may think they're jokes, you may think they're acceptable within the kind of jokes other players make, but when you behave the way you do, even jokingly, Imagine seeing a player do something you think is bad enough to make an ahelp or player complaint about. Imagine then, in a single second, that you learn that they're the head admin, the host, a person who has repeatedly made fun of people making complaints and the complaints themselves, has repeatedly joked about how no staff complaint can touch them, has repeatedly been excessively confrontational in arguments, has repeatedly expressed that antags should do whatever they want, and has said in the past "That's your problem" or something along the lines of that when your way of going about things was criticized. That's going to make you say "Oh, of course it was you." on instinct. My response was not an angry "Of course it was you." but an absolutely depressed "Of course it was you."

The fact that you're making this an issue about my feelings and my feelings only is really just fucked up and I can see that making a complaint was a mistake. You're exceptionally provocative, and when met with criticism towards you attitude you just try to dismiss it as just humor or the fault of the person complaining. I really don't want to beat around the bush here but straight up you have behaved exactly like the sort of people who get permabanned on here, which I don't think is fair to anyone. Like in no world should it be okay for a player or a member of staff or anyone to say "And there is nothing you can do with it." in response to someone saying "Oh, of course it was you." when revealing the character they played. Like you admitted you didn't even say that as a joke, but because you were annoyed. It's hard to know when you are serious and not when you're serious when you say the same extremely concerning things when you're upset and when you're apparently joking. You don't seem to see anything wrong with that and think that it's my fault that I have issue with it. That is what I have issue with and that is why I made the complaint. If you did not say those words then I wouldn't have made a complaint about it. Since we're talking about the reasons why you said the things you said, let me talk about the reasons why I said the things I said. The reason why I don't think I'm insane right now in reporting your behavior is because I've seen other players notice exactly how you play and somehow, despite using the context of your actions, know that it is you who is playing. People know who you play, and not for good reasons, and I think that is extremely important here and cannot just be dismissed because of feelings.

All my questionable radio quotes are from other servers. Nearly everything in my imgur folder of Aurora is of personal conversations so enjoy this trash.

A conversation is not impossible dude. Regardless if it's your intent that you're acting like this or not, you are coming off like this. My word choice in this thread has been precise and to convey that I'm not directly accusing you of abusing your position but rather you are being excessively provocative when you claim that you're immune to staff complaints and they don't matter while you're doing borderline rule breaking behavior in game. I genuinely believe that you're not abusing your position, but pretending to do so sends a message to players.

if I present a bunch of bad things and then some minor things, and someone comments on the minor things and giving a glowing review on how they did those minor things, I'm going to question that contribution and ask for elaboration on why they didn't comment on the just as important or more important parts. It's good that you explained yourself, and I'm sorry for making that accusation, but I've dealt with plenty of people before who like to selectively ignore arguments. Like to me if I present people with 3 pieces of terrible behavior and their only comment was that of a glowing review on how they had fun on one of them, I'm going to question it. Like just see from my perspective. You have a player who constantly jokes about being immune to punishment, brags about times when they've done borderline meme related things, has insulted players in the past directly, directly makes fun of staff complaints made against people on discord, plays characters who act and behave like new players, and refuses to show any sort of sympathy or any sort of respect for players, not just me, who have criticized the way that garn plays characters. I don't know if people forgot, but I was permabanned this sort of bad behavior and I've seen other players get banned, warnings, or notes for the same sort of shit, regardless of how much they were joking at the time. Like even here they're justifying the honestly appalling and annoyance driven "There is nothing you can do about it." comment about their low rp play because I provoked them. I got a warning like 2 weeks ago after telling someone to fuck off because they were harassing me over shit I've done a year ago. Hell, I was told by Alb to report this sort of provocative behavior so I really don't think that behaving like this ICly or OOCly is in line with community standards.

I'm kind of disappointed in this post. Like, all Garn did was argue on comms, barricaded himself in engineering, shouted on comms, and fought security all while escalating super fast which was probably only fun for him, and security. I'm not saying that he should've interacted with all the crew, I'm saying that nothing he did should really dismiss the "light-hearted nature" of Garn's gameplay just because it was "refreshing", and honestly it really isn't because most antagonist do this sort of thing all the time, except they don't behave oddly. The reason I'm disappointed is because you seem to be justifying this behavior while seemingly ignoring all the awful shit he says about it. Like I've been noted for doing the same sort of meme behavior as AI and Cyborg and I don't understand why Garn gets a free pass to do this sort of shit while players don't. I especially don't understand why he gets a free pass for him to brag about all this shit and then claim that he's untouchable and that staff complaints against him don't matter.

I don't think it was because you were annoyed considering you say this sort of thing nearly all the time. Like I knew you had a history of saying thing like "This is not a democracy" when people seriously post about PRs and whatnot and a history of shitting on staff complaints. Like it's extremely hard to take it as "just a joke" when you do extremely questionable things, brag about you doing those questionable things, and then say things like "there is nothing you can do about it" or "i'm untouchable" or "staff complaints against me don't matter" when someone raises an eyebrow. What I'm complaining about is your behavior as a player and how you play characters. You intentionally play characters who act like they don't know how to play or do their job or anything, which then cause issues worthy of a hidden camera show. You then brag about the things you do to people and then claim that complaints against you don't matter because you can't be touched. You shit on staff complaints on discord and say a lot of fucking weird shit as well which honestly raises quite a few eyebrows. You then dismiss this as all just one big joke and that you're just fucking around while other people are confused or annoyed by the things you do. Like when I searched for "complaint" on discord I did not expect to find so many instances of you shitting on complaints, admitting that you don't read all of them and skim some of them, and telling everyone you're immune to staff complaints because you're host. It wasn't even hard to post all that evidence considering that every time I scrolled down it was just another page of you saying this sort of shit.

BYOND Key: BurgerBB Game ID: b3T-a3NE Player Byond Key/Character name: Garnascus Reason for complaint: Poor character/player behavior. Did you attempt to adminhelp the issue at the time? If so, what was the known action taken by administration/moderation? No, round was ending and I just got back for the round end after being disconnected. The single instance alone wasn't worth ahelping because it's not against the rules to be new. Approximate Date/Time: October 25th, 2019. 12:00 AM PST To put it short, it was rev and both the head loyalists and the head revs (Garnacus was a head rev) was messing around with insults over comms and other shit. It was generally borderline mrp behavior from all sides to the point where someone other than me to comment sarcastically that it was great RP. To skip right to it, later in the round I hear laser and taser fire from engineering, so like every chick from a horror movie, I examine engineering from a safe distance, saw it barricaded, and then saw some guy in an engineering suit walking around. Without so much as a word, they proceeded to fire at me, hitting me twice, so I fled. I was a bit forgiving of the interaction because I thought they were a new player and it didn't go bad, so I just told security and medical. Turns out the person in question was Garnacus, which I had a bit of an issue with considering that it he is not a new player, he has a history of this sort of thing that I thought was gone, and it was a player who never really interacted at all with the round. I'm an advocate of good fun, but the way Garnascus behaves using their character intentionally mimics that of a new player unfamiliar to RP and it just seems malicious with all things considered. It is incredibly rare to discover the characters Garnascus plays, but when it happens, it is always characters who are disruptive, childlike, and generally have no effort put into communication or motive. In cases of garnascus being an antagonist, he is extremely quick to escalate. None of what Garnascus is doing is against the rules when judged on its own, but the way he presents his character, the way presents himself in OOC, and the fact that he constantly does this sort of thing just seems malicious. Again, I'm all for good fun, but it just concerns the hell out of me when Garnascus plays these characters and then boasts about the stupid things they do or say. I kind of draw the line at "Yes I was, and there was nothing you can do about it." especially with all things considered. I wouldn't have made this complaint if he didn't say that because it really feels like he's abusing his position and is proud of it. Like you might say it's a joke but it's starting to get hard to believe that it's just that at this point. Given absolutely everything presented it just feels like otherwise given the amount of related complaints that he has had officially and unofficially about how he plays and how he behaves to others ICly and OOCly. I've honestly seen players behave like this, if not better than this, and have gotten slaps on the wrist because of it. Like again, it might be in all good fun, but when you just search the sort of shit he says on discord it just seems extremely malicious with all things considered. I mean, I've gotten in shit for jokingly saying "Players don't matter." constantly even in a joking context. I don't think this is okay. I don't think I'm being unreasonable here when I'm saying that this isn't okay.