Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About witchbells

  • Rank
  • Birthday 14/03/1995

Personal Information

  • Interests
    scarecrow, jonathan crane, master of fear, lord of despair, duke of dread, prince of palpitations, savant of screams, marquis of the macabre

Linked Accounts

  • Byond CKey

Recent Profile Visitors

2,255 profile views
  1. I don't feel confident about lifting this ban just yet. You have a history of concerning behavior, and while your lucidity in this complaint gives me high hopes, I think you should improve your play to a much better degree for me to feel comfortable lifting this. I would wait another few months until you make another appeal. Additionally, I recommend you take the way you play into serious consideration. You're noted for your behavior quite often, but this complaint makes me think you can improve on this. Appeal denied.
  2. Because I was corrected. It was mentioned for the sake of transparency. I don't know what your intention is with this addition other than to argue semantics. It is true that I have been contacted by multiple people who have issues with your playstyle. I obviously have no way of accessing your discord messages to cross-check if any of these people were the same person. I have no comment on the fact that you have only been contacted by one person taking issue with the character so far. I will reiterate my previous point. If your character has no issue with passing a fl
  3. The other staffmembers have not told me that you, specifically, were not breaking the rules. They clarified the rules on fluency, which I still believe your character is breaking. I will try to elaborate. One would hope you weren't doing so intentionally, however, I've received multiple reports from people (who I have not revealed, and will continue to not reveal for their sakes, as is custom) who were very upset with your character's level of fluency that is, in your words, to provide "fun IC conflict." Regardless of your intentions, it is terribly convenient that your c
  4. I stand by my judgement on your character's fluency. While I've been corrected by other staff members on the fluency issue itself, it revealed another problem within the problem - I've received multiple reports, both during that round and after you publicly posted this complaint about Jrihrarmrra in regards to you using the character's fluency as an excuse to purposefully mess with people., leading to the belief that you're using your characters fluency as an excuse. You claim that your character is fluent enough to pass entry tests, yet has trouble with simple commands like "stop" and "no" wh
  5. It's passable, but it does nothing to illustrate that you've changed. I contacted you about a violation of one of our most simple rules, and your reaction was to refuse a name change, argue with staff, and log off. You display zero regard for the rules of our server and your ban appeal, where you've shown no acknowledgement of the rules you've broken nor an effort to improve upon this aspect, enforces this. I am not unbanning you at this time. Appeal denied. Locking and archiving.
  6. Bad luck has very little to do with you doing what was almost exactly what you were warned for prior. Just six days ago, even. I need you to understand that you're displaying a pattern of behavior here. This has nothing to do with poor luck, this is a poor decision. This is not something that barring yourself from antagonist roles will fix. Escalation is not a straight line from Point A to Point B, but a sliding scale of sorts, and you must use the scale to decide the proper plan of action. Your objective is not to reach a high level of violence in an allotted a
  7. Please use the format, which I have linked here. Right now, I have minimal interest in overturning this ban. You seem to have little regard for the rules of our server and seeing this, I'm not sure if it will change.
  8. This seems rather pointless, for instance, I can't remember the last time a character refused conversion and lived to tell the tale, on account of them being murdered to death for resisting.
  9. Oh, no. This isn't a good idea at all. Forcing people to play antag when they don't want to results in a number of things happening, 1. They will immediately cryo. Staff can simply tell people not to do this, which leads to my next point. 2. They will either throw the round or be a pisspoor antagonist. People will put effort into things if they care about them, which is why we implemented antagonist preferences and the vote draft in the first place. Forcing players into a certain role (a role that requires responsibility and skill at the game, at that) will result in little go
  10. Your notes are mostly harmless and I really believe you can use this as a chance to improve your play. I have no problem with appealing this, and I assume you understand that returning to your previous behavior really won't fly after your appeal. That said, appeal accepted. Locking and archiving.
  11. More words because I'm bad at making lots of them. I hope I can clear up some of the ambiguities of my proposal. When I say that the project functions as a thinktank, I mean that it's a collective of people sharing their research for the good of the field itself and for synthetic lifeforms. Some examples of things their members would tackle are things like expanding the senses of synthetic lifeforms, like olfactory receptors, coatings for shells with haptic feedback, porous cooling systems, gustatory receptors, artificial musculature instead of actuators, and various other experime
  12. Type (e.g. Planet, Faction, System): Organization. Describe this proposal in a single sentence (12 word maximum): Group that sets out to bridge the gap between organics and synthetics. How will this be reflected on-station? In concept, I want it to be something that characters can work towards in the background and connect with. We have a number of groups in our universe, but I don't feel like there's anything pertaining to the study of artificial intelligence like this. And, of course, the possibility of affiliated paraphernalia for characters to carry a
  13. I understand completely how such an incident can come off from a first look, and how such chaos on the station influenced the decision, even with the supporting testimony, but such convictions are not to be made lightly. I'd like to expand on this a bit. Yes and yes. This is the crux of the issue I'm trying to get at here. An attempted murder/murder conviction and requires a much more nuanced approach from both an IC and an OOC perspective. Such a conviction needs to be handled tactfully and investigated thoroughly before dropping the metaphorical hammer, and this is what I
  14. I understand why you might have found the tone objectionable, but I was dealing with multiple tickets for at the time for two separate issues, and opted to use a more directed approach. You were being accused of lying to administration - by the person who was ahelping. It is not shown in the note because thankfully, you weren't. It simply seemed like you got the wrong impression of a situation. Here's the note I left you.
  15. The wording can certainly be changed. I will not be removing the details of the substance (calling it toxic, specifically), or the round type from the warning, and I will add it that it was done through the merchant. I also apologize for calling rewriter alcoholic. Pretty dumb mistake, and I probably could've just doublechecked.
  • Create New...