UnknownMurder

I don't personally find this a problem, but I can see a possible toggle-able button feature to have. Just something to know.

Heh. Security has a mama's boy. +1 Would definitely engage him in RP with a spice of IC bully.

I'd like for case manager to look at the witness testimony.

Someone mentioned that if you run too much. You can go in critical and die. Not sure if who. You'll have to find him through this GAME ID. Game ID: b3peYf

Nice Hillary pun. That was hilarious.

I saw.

I am refusing to admit the death of the Security Officers being my fault. I am only refusing to accept that blame. Are you trying to get me to accept the blame for their deaths for disobeying my orders? I told them one simple order and only one simple order, get to the security. You're blaming this on me for attempting to take complete control of Security. Otherwise, what other IC blames are you asking me to take? You say this. We tried to formulate a plan in the conference room, I did not say we're going to jump the gun and comply with the terrorists without getting Security involved. I dismissed you and let you do what you wanted for about 5 minutes. Look where that got you in. I just don't know anymore about you. They can stand outside of the Bridge. They can stand outside of the conference room. Cadmus was already there for our safety. Please do not forget the orders I have given the Security to remain near the brig in habitable areas. How hard was this order? The same can be said on your part. Good to know you're taking the blame on this part. Good on you. That didn't look like it to me. I am also uncomfortable with your roleplay being now. If you wanted to talk this out and reaching to compromise, we could have done that in discord. From the Captain's perspective, how can the Captain expect to run a station if the crew members will not obey him? More importantly, how can you expect the Captain to run a station if no one will listen to him? My responsibility as the Captain is to keep the crew safe and productive as well as your responsibility is to keep the crew safe. The conflict lies with our disagreements on handling the issues. I am sure this was because Alberyk ruled it as IC issue when he told you to make a complaint. Who said anything loyalty implants granting impunity to do whatever I want? You're the one who broke the chain of command and violated Corporate Regulations. You would have been charged with insubordination if this case was real life. You should consider other people's point of views in the thread of how you played the Head of Security in that round.

That's what we did, we told you not to attack them and move yourselves to Security. I canceled the order for the Nuclear Disk, I told you to get to Security. I told the Security Officer in the Bridge to get to Security. This was my only order standing. Get to Security. How did you end up being in Research and Development? Irrelevant example for the case. You lied in some of your parts in your OP post too and acted immature in-game. It was pointed out by ForgottenTraveler and Veradox. Jackboot. Kettle calling pot black. I'm going to have to point this out again. Are you aware of this CCIA announcement? If you're not, this the exact same case that's been happening with Command Staffs attempting to refuse Captain's orders. I call upon a Counter-Complaint to put Jackboot's roleplay under review and request logs of the entire incident including announcements.

BYOND Key: UnknownMurder Game ID: bo47Xf Player Byond Key: Jackboot Staff involved: Alberyk (just answering questions on paths to take) Reason for complaint: IcognitoJesus says making a counter-complaint is permitted. Where should I start? Jackboot exaggerates too much on my complaint regarding specific actions and some lies. However, first we'll focus on the Head of Security's behavior. Head of Security's behavior had been very disobedient and refusing to obey the Captain's orders. Causing the Command's relationship with the intruders to worse and more appearing that we are violent people. The sole purpose of the Security is to protect every crew personnel's life. Not to waste them as Head of Security with a loyalty implant dying with the other two Security Members because he disobeyed orders even with a loyalty implant. At this point, I am not even sure if Jackboot is attempting to get themselves some antagonist or as the general public says validing people, I am unable to trust Jackboot's words. When I call all Command Staffs to report to the Conference Room. Chief Engineer comes in firstly, then I drag the temporary-SSD HoP. Commander walks in with his officer. I tell the officer to leave because we already have a guard. Cadmus is our guard. Head of Security refuses to recognize this and attempts to order the officer. I PDA Cadmus to deal with the issue while I attempt to rope up CE, HoP, and HoS into the discussion of negotiations with the radio on linked to the terrorists. HoS was not just taking the negotiations anymore, and I dismiss him. Couple of minutes later, we heard that Security are attacking the terrorists and are losing. I decided to remain silent and let them do what they want whilst attempting to tell terrorists that we will comply now. Head of Security and Security Officer before dying, blaming their deaths on me over the public radio and attempted to get the crew station riled up to rebel while I made that announcement. Head of Security and Security Officer are dead now, one officer has been taken hostage and tortured, shortly died because he didn't listen to terrorist or even me to protect his own life. The last two remaining loyal security personnel were MRLO who was part of the demands and Detective Booker. I am unsure which part I have missed out on, but these were the general points of Head of Security's failure to execute order and insubordination. Did you attempt to adminhelp the issue at the time? If so, what was the known action taken by administration/moderation? Regarding Jackboot? No. Just answering questions on paths to take after Security's fallen. Approximate Date/Time: 6:40 11/7/2016

That was were I wanted the Security to be. Somewhere near the Security Brig. And you continued to refuse to follow orders. I did not refuse to speak with you. You didn't contact me over headset command channel or PDA. You wanted to fight them. I wanted to resolve peacefully. You refused my orders. I dismissed you. You could have lost your job right away if this was real life. That wasn't my orders to tell you to go to the R&D. You went there on your choice. Why did you go and fight I don't know 3-4 people without calling backup? I'm supposing the backup came and late, got tortured, refused to scream for his life, and died when Amalia demanded me to order the backup to scream for his life. He still refused. See CCIA announcement. You continued to question my order in the conference room and bicker with me. Wrong. Alamia ordered me to order the Security to scream for his life for his safety. He didn't scream. He got dismembered. We saw the Security Camera through RAT's cameras. I had adminhelped to Alberyk after your deaths, Alberyk acted as if I was proceeding in the right way. I believe this is a case of you got yourself killed because you didn't listen to the Captain. I am not sure what you want me to say. I am unsure how you believe I am acting smug. Head of Personnel, Chief Engineer and I were discussing how we should tackle the obstacle. We even thought about setting a trap or something relevant until that point the Security blamed the Captain (me) for your deaths and closing the door on you and soon almost turned the station against me and got the station to rile up against me and settled down for a moment. I don't know what you want me to say here. What do you want me to say? What do you want me to clarify things for you? What do you want me to explain for you? I valued the lives of the crew members more than I valued my own life. Not to mention, I dragged two people to the escape pod at the end of the shuttle without attempting to engage in fights. On other hand, you want to risk lives. Oh. And you baited me in ICing in OOC over the discord where Alberyk had to step in and tell you to stop while I retracted my post.

you're going to have to be more specific, what does this post even mean ? are you reporting a bug? I need more details Pardon me. Tweak it.

which will be dealt with by IA, muting people for no reason would be a abusing work privileges and would get you fired from any secure station. muting someone is an IC action which can be dealt with by IC means Why give them the means to mute to even abuse it? Keep it where it is, a powerful tool in responsible hands. We get it. You don't like it. As for you, Conservatron, I think I like your way of this thinking.

We have to fix the walk/run system before this whole thing. Right now, everyone's running to one place and another and you want us to be sanic.

Lukas Chapman from what I recall is no longer that anymore, as he's revised his character after suggestions and questions regarding his character, this was all done prior to their command white list application as well. Alrighty.

I have them saved.

There is also Dr/Sec/QM Lukas Chapman.

It's been going on for eight months. Nanda did not respond in time. Jackboot hardly knows. I doubt witnesses would know. Locked and moving. Inform me when you want this unlocked responded to.

No.

Agreed. I'm fine with having an ALT Title with Engineering Access, though. Should it have telecommunications technician access? It might spark some fun ic conflict with antagonists being able to be sneaky and access the telecommunications and mess with the machinery.

No one is perfect.

Balding is still bald.